The meaning of the proverb is that a bad peace is better than a good quarrel. The meaning of the proverb "A bad peace is better than a good quarrel"

The word "here" is used as "bad", and "kind" - it means "good", "strong".

This means that a bad peace is when relations between the warring parties are tense, on the verge of a big quarrel, but the parties do not give themselves the freedom to throw out their emotions and keep themselves within limits.

What is the point?

You can, of course, throw out what has long "boiled" in your soul, quarrel from the heart, and not endure and hypocrisy, and it will become easier. But any manifestation of aggression entails the same response, and that, in turn, does not go unnoticed, and so on in a circle, up to assault. All this is possible and tolerable on the scale of an individual, but on the scale of a large country, a state, everything is fraught with a military conflict. And this is a different scale, and the fate of innocent people, the lives of children, the elderly and women.

There can be no good war, and let there be no peace that gives hope for the future than the madness of war. But the trouble is that a bad peace is not so rosy, although it is much better than a good war.

And even better GOOD WORLD!

This expression calls on enemies on the verge of open conflict to reconcile or at least tolerate each other, but not to cross the line.
This popular expression has Russian and foreign counterparts. Here are some phraseological units:

Thin silence is better than kind grumbling (Russian)
A bad corn promise is better than a good lawsuit (English) - A bad compromise is better than a good lawsuit.
Ein schlechter Friede ist besser als ein gerechter Krieg (German) - A bad peace is better than a right war.
Parempi laiha sopu kuin lihava riita (Finnish) – A bad world is better than a fat dispute.

And in order to better understand the meaning of the expression, I bring to your attention a poem:

Good war. Anton Tumanny

In a red haze of fire
The orchestra played, dropping sounds.
The earth cracked from the heat
And people gave up.
Instantly, the houses collapsed,
The winds swept away the remains of the ashes.
Darkness remains from life here
Shards of ghostly light.
The last man wanders:
An old man with gray hair.
And looks into our crazy age
Sad from troubles eyes.
Reading the writing on the wall:
"Let the world be thin and fragile,
Than in that good war
Let us wash our hands in blood."
The old man stood, the terms are not in power,
The soul asked to become alive.
He remembered how he wrote those lines,
How he argued then with fate.

M Many of you are familiar with the proverb “A bad peace is better than a good quarrel,” but hardly anyone has thought about its meaning enough to decide whether he agrees with it or not. Therefore, reasoning on the topic of its meaning can not only expand your horizons and replenish your knowledge base with useful and interesting information, but also help determine your position in life, understand yourself and your priorities. Because this proverb, in fact, is fraught with a much deeper essence than most of these statements. And then, whether you agree with it completely, partially or categorically disagree, can serve as an evaluation criterion for your character and even point out some qualities. Let's see what the above words express.

In order to understand the proverb as a whole, first we will analyze separately each word used in it, because such a choice is rarely random.

The Old Slavonic word "thin" means fragile, shaky; and the word "kind" also in the outdated version means good. That is, as you may have noticed, they are used as antonyms. Such concepts as "peace" and "quarrel" are similarly contrasted. Consequently, the proverb is built on antithesis, and, like a good old fairy tale, it affirms the victory of good (in any of its manifestations) over evil, good over bad.

But each person himself defines things as good and bad. We ourselves draw the line between good and evil. How are the roles distributed in our case and what is put in the best light?

It is not difficult to guess that the main idea of ​​the proverb is to convey to us: any peace, even if it is shaky and contradicts our foundations and does not fully satisfy us, is better than a quarrel in which we would defend our position. The question is quite controversial and ambiguous. This statement is designed to bring peace to the world, and encourages not to disturb the natural balance and harmony. But can we call this way of achieving the goal - patience and ignoring the problem - the only true one? Hardly.

On the one hand, wouldn't it be great if life was arranged in this way? If everyone yielded in a dispute, if they kept their tongues shut, if each gave up their position, then the world would certainly become much calmer. And how many wars, demonstrations and other disasters, provoked by the human impulse to fight for their beliefs, could have been avoided! How many lives could be saved! We cannot deny the correctness of these words in any way. And to categorically state that they are wrong would be simply a denial of the obvious. But this is only one side of the coin.

On the other hand, it is difficult not to pay attention to the shortcomings of such a position. Human nature has always been distinguished by the desire to move forward, the desire to progress, to express one's opinion and not so much to seek a better life as to create it. Yes, this is not true for all people. But always, at all times, in all situations, there are rebels with fiery speech and passion in their eyes, ready to raise questions that cannot leave anyone indifferent, ready to stir up the souls of people, wake them up from sleep. Such people completely contradict the purpose of the proverb, but we consider them our heroes, we take them as an example to follow. Why? So, they still bring something good to our world, although they risk its peace, violate its foundations?

Let's try to answer the question. A man differs from an animal in that, in addition to instincts, he is guided by the call of the heart; in addition to material values, he has high, spiritual. Therefore, to justify the suppression of one's need for self-expression, in disputes, in contradictions with the instinct of self-preservation, the desire to save one's own skin, can be considered a betrayal of oneself. After all, living in a world that is safe, but hypocritical and imperfect, is not the best possible scenario. Realizing how categorically these words sound, I would like to note that this opinion is deeply subjective. But if you read these words and look at this problem from this point of view, you certainly cannot disagree.

It is impossible to deny after all the above arguments that this proverb can be classified as controversial. Discussions on its subject will continue forever, and it will never be possible to come to a compromise or a general conclusion, because any point of view has its pluses and minuses and has the right to be called correct.

But the only important thing is that we clearly understand that the proverb carries a positive meaning and, although it is formulated in such a way that it cannot satisfy absolutely everyone, it calls to keep our home, the Earth, safe and sound for ourselves and our children. An aspiration that truly deserves special attention and effort.

But perhaps we will be able to achieve peace and harmony among all mankind not in the way that the words “A bad peace is better than a good quarrel” assert, but with the help of open discussions, freedom of speech and a tolerant attitude towards others, respect for other people's opinions. To do this, it is important to remember: do not judge the correctness of someone's judgments until you look at the situation from his side.

On this page: about the meaning (meaning) of such an expression as "A bad peace is better than a good quarrel."

Usually offended by the closest - husband (wife), brothers, sisters, children, grandchildren. Whatever they do, it's not right. They promised to call at three, but they called at five - an insult. They said that they would arrive in the evening, but they arrived at night - an insult. And it doesn’t matter that traffic jams, they didn’t keep their word! We bought seedlings, but not those - again disappointment. Look, Ivanov's children brought what kind of seedlings: heroes, not seedlings. And these - scumbags, even ashamed to show the neighbors. After such a "meanness" is not just an insult, but an insult in the square!

Pride, age or disease?

In Orthodoxy, resentment is considered an echo of pride: a person does not want to enter into the position of another, considers himself superior to the rest. Therefore, there is only one cure - humility and repentance.

Psychologists have a different explanation. They believe that by resentment, we demonstrate dependence on the opinions of others. For example, a friend said that you have recovered a lot, and you took it and got offended. Thus, showing that this topic is painful for you (by the way, it’s better not to fall for such provocations, but try to turn everything into a joke: then people will not have a desire to discuss your appearance).

There are other reasons for resentment. For example, with age, most people become vulnerable and sensitive. Any trifle can unbalance them, any little thing can make them suffer and be offended.

And for someone, resentment appears against the background of serious health problems, in particular, senile dementia. However, in this case, there are other symptoms: deterioration of memory, attention, inability to perform the usual actions.

Don't hold a stone in your bosom

However, getting stuck in a state of resentment is dangerous: negative emotions corrode the body. Chronic resentment can provoke the development of ulcers, bronchial asthma, visual impairment, obesity. Doctors have noticed that most often resentment ricochets through the heart and blood vessels, increasing the risk of hypertension, heart attack and stroke.

California scientists once conducted an experiment dividing 200 volunteers who had experienced a strong offense in the past into two groups: those who forgave the offenders and those who did not forgive. Subjects were asked to recall a painful episode. Scientists at this time controlled their blood pressure and heartbeat. Those who were still angry with the offender had a sharp increase in blood pressure and pulse. And for those who forgave, deviations were not observed. From which the researchers concluded: it is dangerous not only to be offended, but also to accumulate resentment in the soul - then they turn into a heavy burden. So learn to forgive!

Understand and forgive

It is important to remind yourself more often that you will not have other parents, another sister, other children or grandchildren. Therefore, we need to take care of each other. Listen. Hear. Understand. Put yourself in the place of another.

It is important not to forget that in any quarrel, both parties are to blame. And even if your own contribution is minimal, still try to understand and forgive the offender. No one forces you to immediately throw yourself on his neck or pretend that nothing happened. But mentally forgive, letting go of anger, is a must.

If the offender has repented and is looking for ways of reconciliation, all the more it is worth reconciling. Haven't you offended anyone in your life, even unwittingly? Your offender, too, could do this not from evil - he didn’t understand you in the right way or didn’t realize what pain he causes with his words or actions.

There are not many worries

But what if they take offense at you? For example, an old mother thinks that you pay little attention to her. Think about it, maybe she's right? In this case, double your care: call more often, come to visit, bring food, small gifts, help with cleaning. And there will be fewer reasons for resentment.

If you see that an elderly relative is not only offended by everything in a row, but some strange things have appeared in his behavior (for example, he got it into his head that his son-in-law wants to ruin him), if he stopped recognizing his relatives, he hardly understands a new information, see a psychiatrist. In this case, it is necessary to fight not with increased resentment, but with the disease (the first step is to eliminate disturbances in the brain).

Composition on the topic: "A bad peace is better than a good quarrel" 3.25 /5 (65.00%) 4 votes

In Russian speech, there are many beautiful proverbs that are both brief, but at the same time very meaningful, filled with a high meaning and understanding of being. One of these proverbs is the proverb “a bad peace is better than a good quarrel”. Its meaning is immediately clear to all those who have at least a minimal command of the Russian language. But its deep meaning is far from always clear, which is much more interesting than, perhaps, it will seem to someone right off the bat.

So why is a bad peace better than a good quarrel? Why should everyone remember this and strictly follow the prescription of this proverb? First, I would like to explain its content a little more carefully. Relations between people are almost never stable - sometimes they are better, sometimes worse. At the same time, even when such relationships are at their lowest limit, one should refrain from emotional statements and quarrels. Why is it worth doing? It's very simple: no matter how tense the relationship is, no matter how much hostility towards each other accumulates, until this hostility comes out, is not formulated in verbal or any other hostile form, there is a considerable probability that the relationship will sooner or later be discharged, become less tense, and perhaps even move into a friendly phase. By the way, this happens quite often in life: people who at some point refrained from aggression later got together, made friends and began to spend time together. But otherwise, if the bad world still does not resist and develops into a quarrel, it may happen that in their emotional outbursts, quarreling people say a lot of superfluous things, hurt each other to the core so much that in the future there will be no reconciliation and there can be no speech. It is during quarrels that the most unpleasant happens. Moreover, quarrels can have other serious consequences - some negative actions, for which you then have to avenge.

Of course, one should not argue with the wisdom that dominated the minds of our people and led to the formulation of certain proverbs or other wise sayings. A bad peace is much better than a good quarrel. As long as people have not moved from just silent hostility to openly expressing their hostile attitude and emotional insults, there is still a chance for reconciliation, the opportunity to wait out the negative period, find something pleasant in the opponent and even, perhaps, become a good friend for him. But after a quarrel, this is unlikely to happen, because it can become overly emotional.

Table of contents [Show]

Better a bad peace than a good quarrel

In chapter Other to the question What does the proverb “a bad peace is better than a good quarrel” mean? given by the author Detached the best answer is The meaning of the proverb:
Tense, but still peaceful, relations are preferable to open hostility, conflict. It is used to emphasize that it is better not to bring the brewing conflict to a quarrel, or as an approval of the reconciliation that has come after the quarrel.
Thin - in the proverb has the old meaning of "bad".
Examples of the use of the proverb:
We agreed to fight for stacks that were near the fortress ... We talked, apparently, so friendly that Ivan Ignatievich blabbed for joy. “It would have been so long ago,” he told me with a satisfied look, “a bad world is better than a good quarrel, and dishonest, so healthy.”
A bad peace is better than a good quarrel, The old proverb says; And every day he repeats the same examples to us, How can one not get entangled in disputes; And if by chance it comes to them, Not allowing them into the distance, interrupt them first.

This saying: "A bad peace is better than a good quarrel"? -
caused and causes protest in me.
It is like a blue seal on the forehead, which calls at all costs to keep the world at any cost, “the world is bad” (that is, worthless, bad, unsightly, inharmonious) and to avoid quarrels, even “good quarrels”.

I understand that this is a stable expression, probably ideal in a certain historical context, but even now they stigmatize it right and left.

For me, conflict is the basis of development, the basis of movement. This is not what I mean by asking for trouble and making scandals from scratch. You must be able to conflict competently, expediently and productively. But what is the reason to settle for a bad world?

Why is this expression stable? Why is it relevant?
What negative/positive aspects do you see in it?

I have an observation that this stamp is especially common among women. This is true?