What is the victory of Chatsky grief from the mind. What is the meaning of the finale of Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit"? The ideological and moral victory of Chatsky in A.S. Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit"

1. "Swamp" of ignorance and ignorance.

2. Beads for pigs.

3. Win or lose.

Thinking about the question whether the main character won "Woe from Wit" in the confrontation described by the author, one can answer only one thing - no. Alexander Andreevich Chatsky lost. And this answer is not unfounded. We understand this already from the very name of the comedy: grief, trouble from the mind. Smart people are not needed by the society in which Chatsky falls. The dominant role there is played not by the mind or knowledge, but by position. That is why Famusov speaks so flatteringly about Skalozub: “A well-known person, solid, / And he picked up the darkness of distinction: / Not for his years; and an enviable rank, / Not today, tomorrow the general. And then the Skalozub himself confirms the current opinion about the dangers of studying, about people falling ill with this “disease”. “But I firmly picked up some rules. / Chin followed him: he suddenly left the service. / I started reading books in the village.” Enlightenment is harmful to those who live in darkness and do not want to cross this threshold. People voluntarily perish in the "swamp" of ignorance and ignorance.

The concept of rank reigns in the play, it seems to be animated. Only the rank can become that cherished door that opens the big world. Perhaps that is why officials do not have their own opinion. Yes, and the source of information is "decrepit" news. Chatsky's famous monologue begins in this vein: “And who are the judges? - For the antiquity of years / Their hostility is irreconcilable to a free life, / Judgments are drawn from forgotten newspapers / The times of the Ochakovskys and the conquest of the Crimea ... "

The people into whose world Chatsky got into have not changed at all. He seemed to return to the same atmosphere that he had left for a while. But if this time was good for him, then this time did not give anything to the world of the Famusovs. And what can it give if Maxim Petrovich rules the ball with them.

One of the topics that is in the center of everyone's attention is the rumor about Chatsky's insanity. “Everyone repeats the absurdity about me in a voice! / And for others it’s like a triumph, / Others seem to sympathize ... / Oh! if someone penetrated people: / What is worse in them? soul or tongue! And who becomes the culprit of such gossip - a loved one - Sofia!

We can say that Chatsky beats his head against a blank wall of incomprehension and inability to perceive anything new and progressive. He is trying to open the door to others to another world, full of interesting and unknown. Wasted labor! “I wish you to doze in happy ignorance,” Chatsky comments on his retreat.

On his visit, Chatsky encounters another controversial and interesting figure - Molchalin. The name itself betrays the essence of this character. He found his niche: "At my age, one should not dare to have one's own judgment." With this motto, he goes through life. And why say anything if others still decide everything for you. You just need to find the appropriate environment, and Molchalin achieved this. Chatsky quite rightly says about him: “There will be another, well-behaved, / Low worshiper and businessman, / Finally, in virtues / He is equal to the future father-in-law.” In this world, both old and young follow the same road that leads nowhere. Young people do not even try to resist it. Trying to change the situation only Chatsky. He openly enters the fight. Does anyone need all this? In this case, the words that Kuteikin recalls are quite fair: "... it is written for there, do not throw beads in front of pigs, but they will not trample him underfoot."

Despite the whole picture as a whole, which is formed quite quickly, you can find small episodes where the answer to the question can be positive. An example is the appearance of a former friend of Chatsky - Platon Mikhailovich. Once they were united by "camp noise, comrades and brothers." However, Chatsky's friend is now married and in poor health. “Yes, brother, now it’s not like that ...” - Platon Mikhailovich sadly states. And later he repeats several times that "now, brother, I'm not the one ..." The former military man, who could do everything, regrets that the glorious time has passed.

Before us is a clear example of what could have happened to Chatsky himself if he had remained in Moscow. Fate gave Alexander Andreevich Chatsky the opportunity not to regret his glorious life, but to remember it with delight. In the words of Chatsky, a portrait of a single Platon Mikhailovich is drawn. “Is it not last year, at the end, / I knew you in the regiment? only morning: a foot in the stirrup / And you rush about on a greyhound stallion; / Autumn wind blow, even in front, even from the rear.

Griboyedov knowingly introduces the image of Platon Mikhailovich into the comedy. With the help of it, the author tells readers that the answer to the question whether Chatsky won is very ambiguous. In the world where the protagonist got after some time, he was a loser. But if we recall Platon Mikhailovich, then in this case Chatsky can be called the winner. He did not allow himself to be destroyed at the everyday level, which begins in family life. His inquisitive mind, which ultimately leads to failure, is able to perceive new knowledge. And in this case, Chatsky, of course, won.

Therefore, it is probably quite difficult to give a categorical answer: is it a victory or a defeat. The society that Chatsky falls into turns out to be stronger. But even in it there are those who are close in spirit to Chatsky. Among them can be called Platon Mikhailovich. And in comparison with this image, Chatsky's victory is visible. Alexander Andreevich does not sink like his friend does. He chooses another path - escape. The world is not ready for new trends and, moreover, cardinal changes. Therefore, the main character has to state: “You are right: he will come out of the fire unharmed, / Whoever has time to stay with you for a day, / Breathes the air alone / And his mind will survive.” So the departure of Chatsky is not an escape in the truest sense of the word. This is a temporary retreat. When it is impossible to go ahead, there are workarounds. And no matter what grief may be from the mind, still only the mind moves a person forward.

In Griboedov's comedy, victory and defeat are on different scales. And so far we have to state that the “defeat” cup outweighs. But this is not the final answer. Although Chatsky is almost alone, he is there - which means there is hope for the best.

Or defeat.

Thinking about the question whether the main "Woe from Wit" won in the confrontation described by the author, one can only answer one thing - no. Alexander Andreevich Chatsky lost. And this answer is not unfounded. We understand this already from the very name of the comedy: grief, trouble from the mind. Smart people are not needed by the society in which Chatsky falls. The dominant role there is played not by the mind or knowledge, but by position. That is why Famusov speaks so flatteringly about Skalozub: “A well-known person, solid, / And he picked up the darkness of distinction: / Out of his years; and an enviable rank, / Not today, tomorrow the general. And then the Skalozub himself confirms the current opinion about the dangers of studying, about people falling ill with this “disease”. “But I firmly picked up some rules. / Chin followed him: he suddenly left the service. / In the village he began to read books. Enlightenment is harmful to those who live in darkness and do not want to cross this threshold. People voluntarily perish in the "swamp" of ignorance and ignorance.

The concept of rank reigns in the play, it seems to be animated. Only the rank can become that cherished door that opens the big world. Perhaps that is why officials do not have their own opinion. Yes, and the source of information is "decrepit" news. Chatsky's famous monologue begins in this vein: “And who are the judges? - For the antiquity of years / Their enmity is irreconcilable to a free life, / Judgments are drawn from forgotten newspapers / The times of the Ochakovskys and the conquest of the Crimea ... "

The people into whose world Chatsky got into have not changed at all. He seemed to return to the same atmosphere that he had left for a while. But if this time was good for him, then this time did not give anything to the world of the Famusovs. And what can it give if Maxim Petrovich rules the ball with them.

One of the topics that is in the center of everyone's attention is the rumor about Chatsky's insanity. “Everyone repeats the absurdity about me in a voice! / And for others it’s like a celebration, / Others seem to sympathize ... / Oh! if someone penetrated into people: / What is worse in them? soul or tongue! And who becomes the culprit of such gossip - a loved one - Sofia!

We can say that Chatsky beats his head against a blank wall of incomprehension and inability to perceive anything new and progressive. He is trying to open the door to others to another world, full of interesting and unknown. Wasted labor! “I wish you to doze in happy ignorance,” Chatsky comments on his retreat.

On his visit, Chatsky encounters another controversial and interesting figure - Molchalin. The name itself betrays the essence of this character. He found his niche: "At my age, one should not dare to have one's own judgment." With this motto, he goes through life. And why say anything if others still decide everything for you. You just need to find the appropriate environment, and Molchalin achieved this. Chatsky quite rightly says about him: “There will be another, well-behaved, / Low worshiper and businessman, / In virtues, finally, / He is equal to the future father-in-law.” In this world, both old and young follow the same road that leads nowhere. Young people do not even try to resist it. Trying to change the situation only Chatsky. He openly enters the fight. Does anyone need all this? In this case, the words that Kuteikin recalls are quite fair: "... it is written for there, do not throw beads in front of pigs, but they will not trample him underfoot."

Despite the whole picture as a whole, which is formed quite quickly, you can find small episodes where the answer to the question can be positive. An example is the appearance of a former friend of Chatsky - Platon Mikhailovich. Once they were united by "camp noise, comrades and brothers." However, Chatsky's friend is now married and in poor health. “Yes, brother, now it’s not like that ...” - Platon Mikhailovich sadly states. And later he repeats several times that "now, brother, I'm not the one ..." The former military man, who could do everything, regrets that the glorious time has passed.

Before us is a clear example of what could have happened to Chatsky himself if he had remained in Moscow. Fate gave Alexander Andreevich Chatsky the opportunity not to regret his glorious life, but to remember it with delight. In the words of Chatsky, a portrait of a single Platon Mikhailovich is drawn. “Is it not last year, at the end, / I knew you in the regiment? only morning: a foot in the stirrup / And you rush on a greyhound stallion; / Autumn wind blow, even in front, even from the rear.

Griboyedov knowingly introduces the image of Platon Mikhailovich into the comedy. With the help of it, the author tells readers that the answer to the question whether Chatsky won is very ambiguous. In the world where the protagonist got after some time, he was a loser. But if we recall Platon Mikhailovich, then in this case Chatsky can be called the winner. He did not allow himself to be destroyed at the everyday level, which begins in family life. His inquisitive mind, which ultimately leads to failure, is able to perceive new knowledge. And in this case, Chatsky undoubtedly won.

Therefore, it is probably quite difficult to give a categorical answer: is it a victory or a defeat. The society that Chatsky falls into turns out to be stronger. But even in it there are those who are close in spirit to Chatsky. Among them can be called Platon Mikhailovich. And in comparison with this image, Chatsky's victory is visible. Alexander Andreevich does not sink like his friend does. He chooses another path - escape. The world is not ready for new trends and, moreover, cardinal changes. Therefore, the main character has to state: “You are right: he will come out of the fire unharmed, / Whoever has time to stay with you for a day, / Breathes the air alone / And his mind will survive.” So the departure of Chatsky is not an escape in the truest sense of the word. This is a temporary retreat. When it is impossible to go ahead, there are workarounds. And no matter what grief may be from the mind, still only the mind moves a person forward.

In Griboedov's comedy, victory and defeat are on different scales. And so far we have to state that the “defeat” cup outweighs. But this is not the final answer. Although Chatsky is almost alone, he is there - which means there is hope for the best.

A.S.Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”, work on which was completed in 1824, is an innovative work both in terms of issues, and in style, and in composition. For the first time in Russian dramaturgy, the task was set to show not just a comedy action based on a love triangle, not images-masks corresponding to the traditional roles of comedies of classicism, but living, real types of people - Griboedov's contemporaries, with their real problems and not only personal, but also social conflicts.

Very accurate about the features of the construction

The comedy "Woe from Wit" said in his critical study "A Million of Torments". I.A. Goncharov: “Two comedies seem to be nested one into the other: one, so to speak, private, petty, domestic, between Chatsky, Sophia, Molchalin and Lisa: this is the intrigue of love, the everyday motive of all comedies. When the first is interrupted, another unexpectedly appears in between, and the action is tied up again, a private comedy is played out in a general battle and tied into one knot.

This fundamental position allows us to correctly assess and understand both the problems and the heroes of the comedy, and therefore, to understand what is the meaning of its finale. But before

All you have to do is figure out what kind of ending you're talking about. After all, if, as Goncharov convincingly says, there are two intrigues and two conflicts in a comedy, then there should be two denouements. Let's start with a more traditional - personal - conflict.

In the comedies of classicism, the action was usually based on a "love triangle", which was made up of characters with a clearly defined function in the plot and character. This "system of roles" included: the heroine and two lovers - a lucky one and an unlucky one, a father who is unaware of his daughter's love, and a maid who arranges dates for lovers - the so-called soubrette. There is some similarity of such "roles" in Griboyedov's comedy.

Chatsky should have played the role of the first, successful lover, who in the finale, having successfully overcome all difficulties, successfully marries his beloved. But the development of the action of the comedy and especially its ending refute the possibility of such an interpretation: Sophia clearly prefers Molchalin, she gives way to gossip about Chatsky's madness, which forces Chatsky to leave not only Famusov's house, but also Moscow and, at the same time, give up hopes for Sophia's reciprocity . In addition, Chatsky also has the features of a reasoning hero, who in the works of classicism served as an exponent of the author's ideas.

Molchalin would fit the role of a second lover, especially since the presence of a second - comic - “love triangle” (Molchalin - Lisa) is also associated with him. But in fact, it turns out that it is he who is lucky in love, Sophia has a special disposition for him, which is more suitable for the role of the first lover. But here, too, Griboedov departs from tradition: Molchalin is clearly not a positive hero, which is necessary for the role of the first lover, and is portrayed with a negative author's assessment.

Griboedov somewhat departs from tradition in the depiction of the heroine. In the classic “role system”, Sophia should have become an ideal heroine, but in “Woe from Wit” this image is interpreted very ambiguously, and in the finale she will not have a happy marriage, but deep disappointment.

The author deviates even more from the norms of classicism in the image of the soubrette - Lisa. As a soubrette, she is cunning, quick-witted, resourceful and bold enough in dealing with her masters. She is cheerful and laid-back, which, however, does not prevent her, as it should be in her role, to take an active part in a love affair. But at the same time, Griboedov endows Lisa with traits that are quite unusual for such a role, making her related to the reasoning hero: she gives clear, even aphoristic characteristics to other heroes, formulates some of the most important positions of Famus society (“sin is not a problem, rumor is not good”, “and golden bag, and aims for generals ”- about Skalozub).

Famusov in the “role system” plays the role of a noble father who is unaware of his daughter’s love, but by changing the traditional ending, Griboedov deprives this character of the opportunity to successfully complete the development of the action: usually in the end, when everything was revealed, a noble father who cares about his daughter’s happiness , blessed the lovers for marriage and it all ended in a wedding.

Obviously, there is nothing like this in the finale of "Woe from Wit Does Not Happen." Famusov really knows nothing about the real state of things until the very end. But even there he still remains in happy ignorance about the true passions of his daughter - he believes that Sophia is in love with Chatsky, and he doesn’t even think about Molchalin as the subject of his daughter’s sighs, otherwise everything would have ended much worse, especially for Molchalin, certainly. Indeed, in addition to what it implies the role of a noble father, the image of Famusov includes the features of a typical Moscow “ace”, a big boss, a gentleman who is not used to having his subordinates allow themselves much less liberties - it’s not for nothing that Molchalin is so afraid of showing sympathy for him from Sophia, despite all the girl's precautions:

And I'm so shaking

And at one thought I crush,

That Pavel Afanasich once

Someday will catch us

Disperse, curse! .. -

Molchalin complains to Liza. Yes, and all the other participants in this “triangle” went so far beyond their roles precisely because, while creating realistic images, Griboedov could not endow them with some standard set of features. And as full-blooded, living images, they began to behave quite differently from the rules of classicism.

Responding to reproaches of “lack of a plan”, that is, exactly what was just said, Griboedov argued that, on the contrary, his plan “is simple and clear in execution. The girl, who is not stupid herself, prefers a fool to a smart man. More precisely, you can't say. And as a result, it turns out that even in what somehow still retained a connection with the traditions of classicism, Griboyedov acted as a true innovator. His characters in the personal sphere behave as it, alas, quite often happens in life: they make mistakes, are lost in conjectures and choose a clearly erroneous path, but they themselves do not know this.

So, Sofya was clearly mistaken in Molchalin, but she believes that the quiet young man actually looks like the noble heroes of the sentimental novels that she loves to read so much. At the same time, preferring to command rather than obey, she sharply rejects the noble, but overly ardent, sometimes even passionate in disputes Chatsky, who manages to inadvertently offend Sofya Molchalin, who is so dear to her heart. As a result, instead of entertaining, making the girl laugh, Chatsky provokes a storm of her anger. She cruelly takes revenge on the unlucky lover: she launches gossip about his madness into society. But she herself will be deeply disappointed: Molchalin turns out to be an ordinary careerist and scoundrel.

Don't be shy, stand up...

Reproaches, complaints, my tears

Do not dare to wait, you are not worth them, -

Sofya angrily throws Molchalin, caught in a lie in relation to her, but insight comes only in the finale.

But Chatsky is also waiting for a very unexpected discovery. From the very beginning, he lived in the world of his illusions: for some reason he decided that Sophia, after his unexpected departure from the Famusov house three years ago, treats him with the same sympathy, although we see no reason for this - after all, he I didn't even write letters to her. Then, finally feeling her coldness, he begins to look for an opponent - and finds him in the face of Skalozub, again without any reason in behavior or words from Sophia. She is an independent girl and can hardly accept her father's opinion of a young and promising colonel so easily. She has her own ideas about her husband, however, also somewhat reminiscent of the image of a husband-boy, husband-servant, traditional for Famus society.

Chatsky nevertheless had a suspicion about Molchalin as a possible rival when Sophia fainted when she saw how he was thrown off by a horse. But Chatsky cannot take the position of a girl, he is too convinced of his judgments, including about Molchalin, which means, in his opinion, Sophia cannot love such a person either. According to some very strange logic, when he heard Sophia praise Molchalin without restraint, he makes a paradoxical conclusion: “She does not respect him. ... She does not put a penny on him.

So Griboedov leads the action to a natural finale: the collapse of the illusions of all the main characters. But such an ending is motivated not from the point of view of the traditional "role system", but from the standpoint of the psychological appearance of each of the characters, the internal motivation of their actions, arising from the individual characteristics of the characters.

As you can see, everything with Griboyedov goes “not according to the rules”: the characters are not the same, and the plot develops in the wrong way, and in the finale, instead of the traditional happy-end, everyone will have the collapse of illusions and hopes. By the way, this “incorrectness” of the comedy caused a negative assessment among many of Griboyedov’s contemporaries, although, of course, true connoisseurs of art, who immediately appreciated the innovative nature of the work, gave very high reviews about it. And yet, even Pushkin, as you know, did not accept this work in everything, in particular, the character of Chatsky seemed unconvincing to him, apparently precisely because he retained the features of a reasoning hero.

But the play has another line of development, which means the finale of another conflict. In it, Chatsky, as a representative of the young progressive-minded generation of Russia of that era, enters into an unequal struggle with the Famus society - that conservative majority that does not want to accept anything new: neither in politics, nor in social relations, nor in the system of ideas, nor in the usual way of life. . He is one against all and the finale of the conflict is, in fact, a foregone conclusion: "Chatsky is broken by the amount of the old force," as Goncharov wrote.

Although Chatsky despises Famus society, expulsion from this society is still painful for him: he grew up here, Famusov once replaced his father and, whatever you say, he loves Sophia, and therefore he really suffers, receiving his “million of torments”, which gives the finale of the comedy even a tragic sound:

With whom was! Where did fate take me?

Everyone is racing! Everyone curse! A crowd of tormentors!

And yet, if his collapse in love is absolutely obvious, then the question of whether the expulsion of Chatsky from Famus society can be called a victory over the hero remains open. “Get out of Moscow! I don’t come here anymore, ”Chatsky shouts in despair. But the world is wide, in it one can find not only a place “where there is a corner for an offended feeling,” but also one’s like-minded people, one’s work in life. After all, if we agree with the legitimacy of comparing Chatsky with the Decembrists - and this was done even by Griboyedov's contemporaries, the Decembrists themselves, with whom the author of Woe from Wit was well acquainted - then we have to admit that the dispute of such heroes as Chatsky, with the old foundations, only starts.

Continuing the conversation about the significance of the final clash between Chatsky and the Famus society, Goncharov noted that, in spite of everything, the hero dealt the conservatives "a mortal blow with the quality of fresh force." It may be premature to talk about a "mortal blow", but it is obvious that the once monolithic Famus society really made a gap - and Chatsky is to blame for this. Now there is no rest for the old Moscow "aces" and noble ladies, because there is no confidence in the inviolability of their positions, although they are still strong. Goncharov is absolutely right when he calls Chatsky "an advanced warrior, a skirmisher", who is always a victim - such is the fate of those who go first.

And perhaps the main meaning of the finale of Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" for us is that a person who dares to go first in the era of a turning point, the change of one century by another, the collapse of old ideas and the emergence of new sprouts, must be ready to sacrifice himself. Always, at all times, woe to the mind that dared to oppose new concepts to generally accepted ones. But also praise to a man who can keep such a mind free and healthy, despite all the vicissitudes of his personal fate.

Test on the comedy "Woe from Wit" Griboyedov

A 1. What is the name of Sophia's lover, with whom she secretly meets at night? a) Skalozub b) Chatsky c) Molchalin d) Repetilov

A 2. Which of the heroes was friends with Chatsky's father? a) Skalozub b) Famusov c) Molchalin d) Gorich

A 3. What does Chatsky demand in the finale of "Woe from Wit"? a) sleigh b) horse c) carriage d) cart

A 4. Who started the rumor about Chatsky's madness? a) Molchalin b) Sofia c) Famusov d) Skalozub

A 5. What is the name of Chatsky? a) Alexander Andreevich b) Alexander Sergeevich c) Alexander Ivanovich d) Alexander Petrovich

A 6. Famusov calls Chatsky a dangerous person because: a) Chatsky wants to steal Sophia b) Chatsky is a gossip c) Chatsky is a freethinker d) Chatsky is a cheater

A 7. Who is Molchalin really in love with? a) Sofia b) Khlestova c) Natalya Dmitrievna d) Liza

A 8. In what city does the action of the comedy "Woe from Wit" take place? a) Moscow b) St. Petersburg c) City N d) Pavlovsk

A 9. How many years has Chatsky been in Moscow? a) 2 years b) 3 years c) 4 years d) 5 years

A 10. Which of the heroes bears the rank of colonel? a) Molchalin b) Famusov c) Repetilov d) Sklozub
A 11. What is the name of Famusov's secretary? a) Repetilov b) Molchalin c) Skalozub d) Gorich

A 12. What club is Famusov a member of? a) English b) American c) French d) Italian

A 13. What estate does the Famusov family belong to? a) tradesmen b) merchants c) nobles d) clergy

A 14. Where and by whom does Famusov serve? a) a general in a regiment b) a manager in a public place c) a court physician d) an assistant minister

A 15. What is the name of Famusov's servant who walks around with a torn elbow? a) Filka b) Fomka c) Parsley d) Pavlushka

A 16. How old is Sofya Famusova? a) 17 years old b) 18 years old c) 19 years old d) 20 years old

A 17. How many actions does the comedy "Woe from Wit" consist of? a) 2 steps b) 3 steps c) 4 steps d) 5 steps

A 18. Molchalin hurt his hand when he fell: a) from the stairs b) from the horse c) from the bench d) from the porch

A 19. What is the name of the deaf prince in the comedy "Woe from Wit"? a) Slaboukhovsky b) Krivoukhovsky c) Bezukhovsky d) Tugoukhovsky

A 20. Who does Famusov want to marry Sofya to? a) for Chatsky b) for Repetilov c) for Skalozub d) for Molchalin

In 1 Finish lines : a) “I would be glad to serve…”; b) "Happy...".

В 2 Who from this list is not the hero of the comedy "Woe from Wit":

Gorich, Famusov, Lisa, Molchalin, Zagoretsky, Tugoukhovsky, Bobchinsky, Repetilov, Khlestova.

В 3 Who is in the comedy "and the golden bag, and marks the generals"?

Q 4 Indicate the type of conflict that unfolds in the play "Woe from Wit".

a) love, b) social, c) love and social, d) family

Q 5 Who owns the following words?

Bypass us more than all sorrows
And the lord's anger, and the lord's love.

C1 Write out five "winged" expressions from the text of A. S. Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit".

Answers to the test questions on the comedy "Woe from Wit"

A 1 - (c) Molchalin 2 - (b) Famusov 3 - (c) a carriage 4 - (b) Sophia 5 - (a) Alexander Andreevich 6 - (c) Chatsky - a freethinker 7 - (d) to Lisa 8 - ( a) Moscow 9 - (b) 3 years 10 - (d) Skalozub 11 - (b) Molchalin 12 - (a) English club 13 - (c) nobles 14 - (b) manager in a public place 15 - (c) Petrushka 16 - (a) 17 years old 17 - (c) 4 actions 18 - (b) from a horse 19 - (d) Prince Tugoukhovsky 20 - (c) for Skalozub

In 1 - a) “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve”; b) “Happy hours are not observed”; 2 - Bobchinsky; 3 - Skalozub; 4 - in; 5 - Lisa

What is the meaning of the finale of A.S. Griboyedov’s play “Woe from Wit”? “Get out of Moscow, I don’t come here anymore ...”. That was the last phrase of Chasky, what did it mean besides the banal meaning that he would never return to this city, what did the author put into the last monologue of the protagonist?

Chatsky throughout the work was opposed to the inhabitants of the Famusov house. His character and mindset brought only problems, he did not have the practical mind of Molchalin. By definition, a person like Chatsky cannot be the head of state.

This requires the Molchalins, who always know who and what to say, where and with whom to meet, where and when to go, they are part of any company, they are able to pull the tension in society onto themselves and get out of it untouched. And people like Chatsky are always pushed out of society for security purposes. They raise mud from the bottom, but it will settle down, everything will fall into place thanks to the Molchalins. And this is understandable, an unstable society cannot exist, which means people with the mind of Chatsky should be pushed out of it, they have no place here ... That is why the main character leaves Moscow, he was almost kicked out of Famusov's house, his behavior was impossible to perceive ...