Composition on the theme of Good and Evil in Gogol's story "Portrait". Literature lesson on the topic: “The study of the influence of good and evil on the talent and fate of the heroes in the story of N.V.

N.V. Gogol

"Portrait"

The work was carried out by the teacher of the Russian language and literature of the MBOU "Shlyapnikovskaya secondary school" Perevozchikova L.Yu.

good and evil

outside the person or inside him?

Problem

What caused the terrible fate of Chartkov?

The story of the moral fall of the artist Chartkov reflected the writer's thoughts about:

• good and evil

• true sense

human life

• moral choice

• conscience

• spiritual fall and resurrection

Vital path Chartkova

Buying a portrait depicting a pawnbroker

Became a fashionable painter

Creating a portrait of Psyche

Visit the exhibition

Creation paintings

Envy

"Artist with Talent"

Death

Path of an artist from Italy

Created a pure unblemished work of art

Chose Rafael as a teacher

Attended exhibitions

I gave everything to art

Immersed in work

becoming a hermit

Went to Italy

Had a passion for art

good

Talent

Love for creativity

The ability to create

Understanding: work-way

to perfection

impatience

Chasing fashion, fame

Comfortable life

Wealth

Narcissism

conceit

Pride

contempt for people

Envy

Desire for revenge

Conclusion

The usurer in the story is the embodiment of evil, this is the devil. The devilish beginning is strong in him. Everything that comes from him is destructive. The man who sold his soul to the devil is doomed.

Path of the icon painter

Creates a picture

where it is approved

goodness and light

Created a portrait

usurer

path of repentance and

purification of the soul

Envy

Painted pictures for the church

Conclusion

• Evil is able to take possession of any person, regardless of his moral nature - this happened to the icon painter

• The usurer is the embodiment of evil that walks the world

• You must have great strength of mind and purity of heart, otherwise evil will subdue a person.

Good and evil are eternal.

Evil is as indestructible as good.

The usurer's words are symbolic:

"I don't want to die completely, I want to live." Therefore, it is no coincidence that his portrait, stolen by someone at an auction, forever remains in the world to tempt with the brilliance of gold and light glory.

LET'S THINK

"Evil is indestructible"

"Evil can be destroyed

finally"

conclusions by lesson

Good and evil both outside and inside a person .

Human life is active

choice between good and evil.

The talent of an artist in the world can

Answer left Guest

The story "Portrait" was written by Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol in 1842. The author uses the traditional motif: money, Wealth in exchange for the soul. It touches upon many problems: the struggle between good and evil in a person's soul, the power of money over a person, but the most important one is the problem of the purpose of art (art is true and imaginary). The story consists of two parts, in each of which there is an artist.
The first part tells about the young painter Chartkov. This is a very talented, but at the same time poor man. He admires the talent of great artists; he is offended by the fact that fashionable artists who paint their pictures get huge money, and he must sit in poverty. But here a strange story happens to him. One day he went into an art shop and saw an unusual portrait. The portrait was very old, it showed an old man in an Asian costume. The portrait greatly fascinated Chartkov. The old man drew him to him; his eyes were especially expressive - they looked at him as if they were real. The young artist, without expecting it, bought this painting. After that, a strange situation happened to Chartkov: at night he had a dream that the old man got out of the picture and showed him a bag of money. This suggests that our young artist craves wealth and fame, there is already something demonic in his soul. Then, waking up, he finds on a willow tree the money that would be enough for him for three years. Chartkov decides that it is better to spend them on canvases and paints, that is, for the benefit of his talent. But he is attracted by temptation: he breaks down and begins to buy a lot of things he does not need, rents an apartment in the city and buys himself fame in the form of a laudable article in the newspaper. He betrayed himself, his talent, became conceited; he pays no attention to the people who once occupied an important place in his life, including a teacher who advised him: "You have a talent; it will be a sin if you ruin it. See that you do not become a fashionable painter ... ". The article in the newspaper made a splash: people ran to him, asking him to paint their portrait, demanding this or that. Chartkov betrayed his soul and heart. Now he painted not so naturally, more similar to the person being portrayed, but as his clients asked: “one demanded to portray himself in a strong, energetic turn of his head; the other with inspired eyes raised upwards; the lieutenant of the guard demanded that Mars be visible in his eyes ... " After this, the artist's opinion completely changes, he is surprised how he could previously attach so much importance to similarity and spend so much time working on a single portrait: it was talent. The genius creates boldly, quickly ..., argued that too much dignity was already attributed to the former artists, that before Raphael they all painted not figures, but herrings ... Mikel-Angel is a braggart ... ". Chartkov becomes a fashionable and famous rich man. The secret of his success is simple - catering to selfish orders and moving away from true art. Once he was asked to express his opinion about the work of a young artist. Chartkov was about to criticize his paintings, but suddenly he sees how great the work of a young talent is. And then he realizes that he exchanged his talent for money. Then envy of all artists seizes him - he buys and spoils their paintings. Soon he goes mad and dies.

Gogol called his story "Portrait". Is it because the portrait of the usurer played a fatal role in the fate of his heroes, artists, whose fates are compared in two parts of the story? Or because the author wanted to give a portrait of modern society and a talented person who perishes or is saved despite hostile circumstances and the humiliating properties of nature? Or is it a portrait of the art and soul of the writer himself, who is trying to escape from the temptation of success and prosperity and purify his soul by high service to art?
Probably, there is a social, moral, and aesthetic meaning in this strange story by Gogol, there is a reflection on what a person, society, and art are. Modernity and eternity are intertwined here so inseparably that the life of the Russian capital in the 30s of the 19th century goes back to biblical reflections about good and evil, about their endless struggle in the human soul.

The story of N.V. Gogol "Portrait" consists of two interrelated parts.
The first part of the story tells about a young artist named Chartkov. Seeing in the shop a strange portrait of an old man with piercing eyes, Chartkov is ready to pay the last two kopecks for him. Poverty does not take away from him the ability to see the beauty of life and enthusiastically work on his sketches. He reaches for the light and does not want to turn art into an anatomical theater and expose the “disgusting person” with a knife-brush. He rejects artists whose "nature itself ... seems low, dirty," so that "there is nothing illuminating in it." Chartkov buys a portrait and takes it to his poor house. At home, he examines the portrait better, and sees that now not only the eyes are alive, but the whole face, it seems as if the old man is about to come to life. The young artist goes to bed, and he dreams that the old man got out of his portrait, and shows a bag in which there are a lot of bundles of money. The artist discreetly hides one of them. In the morning he does discover the money. What happens to the main character next? As soon as the money, miraculously fallen out of the frame of the portrait, gives Chartkov the opportunity to lead a scattered secular life, enjoy prosperity, wealth and fame, and not art, become his idol. Chartkov rents a new apartment, orders a commendable article about himself in the newspaper and begins to paint fashionable portraits. Moreover, the similarity of portraits and
customers - the minimum, as the artist embellishes faces and removes flaws. Money flows like a river. Chartkov himself wonders how he could previously attach so much importance to similarity and spend so much time working on one portrait. Chartkov becomes fashionable, famous, he is invited everywhere. The Academy of Arts asks him to express his opinion about the work of a young artist. Chartkov was about to criticize, but suddenly he sees how magnificent the work of a young talent is. He understands that he once traded his talent for money. But the shock experienced by Chartkov from the beautiful picture does not awaken him to a new life, because for this it was necessary to give up the pursuit of wealth and fame, to kill the evil in himself. Chartkov chooses a different path: he begins to expel talented art from the world, to buy up and cut magnificent canvases, to kill good. And this path leads him to madness and death.

What was the cause of these terrible transformations: the weakness of a person in the face of temptations or the mystical sorcery of a portrait of a usurer who gathered the evil of the world in his burning gaze?

Evil offends not only Chartkov, who is subject to the temptations of success, but also the father of the artist B., who painted a portrait of a usurer who looks like the devil and who himself has become an evil spirit. And “a firm character, an honest straight person”, having painted a portrait of evil, feels “incomprehensible anxiety”, disgust for life and envy for the successes of his talented students. He can no longer write good, his brush is driven by "an impure feeling", and in the picture intended for the temple "there is no holiness in the faces."

Seeing self-interest, insignificance, "earthlyness" of people, the writer is indignant and teaches. The artist, the father of the narrator of the second part of B., atoning for the evil that he committed by painting a portrait of a usurer, goes to a monastery, becomes a hermit and reaches that spiritual height that allows him to paint the Nativity of Jesus. Having taken monastic vows, he bequeathed to his son to find and destroy the portrait. He says: “Whoever has talent in himself must be the purest of all in soul.”

The neighborhood of the first and second parts in Gogol's "Portrait" is intended to convince the reader that evil can take possession of any person, regardless of his moral nature. And so it will always be. After all, the portrait disappears. Evil walks around the world, finding new victims...

The story "Portrait" was written by Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol in 1842. The author uses the traditional motif: money, Wealth in exchange for the soul. It touches upon many problems: the struggle between good and evil in a person's soul, the power of money over a person, but the most important one is the problem of the purpose of art (art is true and imaginary). The story is in two parts, each with an artist.
The first part tells about the young painter Chartkov. This is a very talented, but at the same time poor man. He admires the talent of great artists; he is offended by the fact that fashionable artists who paint their pictures get huge money, and he must sit in poverty. But here a strange story happens to him. One day he went into an art shop and saw an unusual portrait. The portrait was very old, it showed an old man in an Asian costume. The portrait greatly fascinated Chartkov. The old man drew him to him; his eyes were especially expressive - they looked at him as if they were real. The young artist, without expecting it, bought this painting. After that, a strange situation happened to Chartkov: at night he had a dream that the old man got out of the picture and showed him a bag of money. This suggests that our young artist craves wealth and fame, there is already something demonic in his soul. Then, waking up, he finds on a willow tree the money that would be enough for him for three years. Chartkov decides that it is better to spend them on canvases and paints, that is, for the benefit of his talent. But he is attracted by temptation: he breaks down and begins to buy a lot of things he does not need, rents an apartment in the city and buys himself fame in the form of a laudable article in the newspaper. He betrayed himself, his talent, became conceited; he pays no attention to the people who once occupied an important place in his life, including a teacher who advised him: "You have a talent; it will be a sin if you ruin it. See that you do not become a fashionable painter ... ". The article in the newspaper made a splash: people ran to him, asking him to paint their portrait, demanding this or that. Chartkov betrayed his soul and heart. Now he painted not so naturally, more similar to the person being portrayed, but as his clients asked: “one demanded to portray himself in a strong, energetic turn of his head; the other with inspired eyes raised upwards; the lieutenant of the guard demanded that Mars be visible in his eyes ... " After this, the artist's opinion completely changes, he is surprised how he could previously attach so much importance to similarity and spend so much time working on a single portrait: it was talent. The genius creates boldly, quickly ..., argued that too much dignity was already attributed to the former artists, that before Raphael they all painted not figures, but herrings ... Mikel-Angel is a braggart ... ". Chartkov becomes a fashionable and famous rich man. The secret of his success is simple - catering to selfish orders and moving away from true art. Once he was asked to express his opinion about the work of a young artist. Chartkov was about to criticize his paintings, but suddenly he sees how great the work of a young talent is. And then he realizes that he exchanged his talent for money. Then envy of all artists seizes him - he buys and spoils their paintings. Soon he goes mad and dies.
The second part of the story tells about a completely different artist. A young man comes to the auction and says that he wants to take the portrait of the old man, which should rightfully be his. Here this poor young artist is telling a story about a certain moneylender. He was extraordinarily rich and could borrow money from anyone. But every person who borrowed from him ended his life sadly. One day this moneylender asked me to draw his portrait. The portrait began to be painted by the father of the artist who tells the story. But every day he felt disgust for the usurer, for his eyes in the picture were very expressive, as if alive. Soon the moneylender died. The artist realized that he had committed a great sin by painting a portrait of a usurer, because misfortune happened to everyone who fell into his hands. He becomes a hermit, goes to a monastery. Soon he painted the icon of the Nativity of Jesus, having spent many years here. In this way, he healed his soul: “No, it is impossible for a person, with the help of human art alone, to produce such a picture: the holy higher power led your brush, and the blessing of heaven rested on your labor.” After that, he bequeaths to his son, a young artist, to destroy the portrait that he once painted, the portrait of the devil himself.
Thus, we see in the poem two completely different artists, whose fates are connected by one portrait. But in the first case, the artist goes from talent to death, and in the second - the path from committing sin to good.

Good and evil in the story of N.V. Gogol "Portrait"
Gogol called his story "Portrait". Is it because the portrait of the usurer played a fatal role in the fate of his heroes, artists, whose fates are compared in two parts of the story? Or because the author wanted to give a portrait of modern society and a talented person who perishes or is saved despite hostile circumstances and the humiliating properties of nature? Or is it a portrait of the art and soul of the writer himself, who is trying to escape from the temptation of success and prosperity and purify his soul by high service to art? Probably, there is a social, moral, and aesthetic meaning in this strange story by Gogol, there is a reflection on what a person, society, and art are. Modernity and eternity are intertwined here so inseparably that the life of the Russian capital in the 30s of the 19th century goes back to biblical reflections about good and evil, about their endless struggle in the human soul.
The story of N.V. Gogol "Portrait" consists of two interrelated parts. The first part of the story tells about a young artist named Chartkov. Seeing in the shop a strange portrait of an old man with piercing eyes, Chartkov is ready to pay the last two kopecks for him. Poverty does not take away from him the ability to see the beauty of life and enthusiastically work on his sketches. He reaches for the light and does not want to turn art into an anatomical theater and expose the “disgusting person” with a knife-brush. He rejects artists whose "nature itself ... seems low, dirty," so that "there is nothing illuminating in it." Chartkov buys a portrait and takes it to his poor house. At home, he examines the portrait better, and sees that now not only the eyes are alive, but the whole face, it seems as if the old man is about to come to life. The young artist goes to bed, and he dreams that the old man got out of his portrait, and shows a bag in which there are a lot of bundles of money. The artist discreetly hides one of them. In the morning he does discover the money. What happens to the main character next? As soon as the money, miraculously fallen out of the frame of the portrait, gives Chartkov the opportunity to lead a scattered secular life, enjoy prosperity, wealth and fame, and not art, become his idol. Chartkov rents a new apartment, orders a commendable article about himself in the newspaper and begins to paint fashionable portraits. Moreover, the similarity of portraits and customers is minimal, since the artist embellishes faces and removes flaws. Money flows like a river. Chartkov himself wonders how he could previously attach so much importance to similarity and spend so much time working on one portrait. Chartkov becomes fashionable, famous, he is invited everywhere. The Academy of Arts asks him to express his opinion about the work of a young artist. Chartkov was about to criticize, but suddenly he sees how magnificent the work of a young talent is. He understands that he once traded his talent for money. But the shock experienced by Chartkov from the beautiful picture does not awaken him to a new life, because for this it was necessary to give up the pursuit of wealth and fame, to kill the evil in himself. Chartkov chooses a different path: he begins to expel talented art from the world, to buy up and cut magnificent canvases, to kill good. And this path leads him to madness and death.
What was the cause of these terrible transformations: the weakness of a person in the face of temptations or the mystical sorcery of a portrait of a usurer who gathered the evil of the world in his burning gaze?
Evil offends not only Chartkov, who is subject to the temptations of success, but also the father of the artist B., who painted a portrait of a usurer who looks like the devil and who himself has become an evil spirit. And “a firm character, an honest straight person”, having painted a portrait of evil, feels “incomprehensible anxiety”, disgust for life and envy for the successes of his talented students. He can no longer write good, his brush is driven by "an impure feeling", and in the picture intended for the temple "there is no holiness in the faces."
Seeing self-interest, insignificance, "earthlyness" of people, the writer is indignant and teaches. The artist, the father of the narrator of the second part of B., atoning for the evil that he committed by painting a portrait of a usurer, goes to a monastery, becomes a hermit and reaches that spiritual height that allows him to paint the Nativity of Jesus. Having taken monastic vows, he bequeathed to his son to find and destroy the portrait. He says: “Whoever has talent in himself must be the purest of all in soul.”
The neighborhood of the first and second parts in Gogol's "Portrait" is intended to convince the reader that evil can take possession of any person, regardless of his moral nature. And so it will always be. After all, the portrait disappears. Evil walks around the world, finding new victims
Why is this the author? It seems to me that the author once again calls on the artist to be careful, attentive, responsible, calls, first of all, to keep the purity of the heart, to “keep awake” in the soul.