Zhanna Friske's father on a lie detector. The lie detector confirmed that Dmitry Shepelev did not spend Rusfond's money: the TV presenter was asked sharp questions in the studio “Let them talk

Dmitry Shepelev
// Photo: Frame from the program

Two years ago, Zhanna Friske passed away. Until now, the artist's family and her common-law husband cannot improve relations. In addition, talk about the disappearance of 20 million, which were collected by the Rusfond organization, does not subside. The civil husband of the artist Dmitry Shepelev came to the studio of Andrey Malakhov's program “Let them talk” to honestly answer all the questions that concern thousands of fans of the singer and her friends. The TV presenter agreed to have experts check him on a lie detector.

Dmitry Shepelev admitted that he was very tired of the scandals that denigrate the name of Jeanne. According to the man, he could not close his eyes on the eve of filming the program.

“I haven't slept, I'll tell you honestly, and at the same time, I have a great feeling of gratitude for the meeting that we can have today. I'm worried, really worried. To my horror and my incomprehension, the story of Jeanne and everything connected with her is not left alone. All this continues to be discussed, condemned, ”said Dmitry.

Shepelev noted that a lot of questions still remain unanswered. According to the TV presenter, he came to the program to dot the i's. Most of all, the public is concerned about the disappearance of funds from the accounts of Rusfond, which were collected for the treatment of Friske. Recall that the court ordered the return of all the money of the artist's heirs, including Jeanne's mother and father, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich, as well as her son Plato. Dmitry Shepelev on the recovery of millions: "Plato should not be responsible for this"

“I have to say separately about this money. This is special money that cannot be treated like paper money, it is the equivalent of love. With this money, people all over Russia and around the world supported the seriously ill beloved girl Zhanna Friske, ”Shepelev said.

The TV presenter explained that the remaining funds were to go to seriously ill children in need of help. Dmitry showed statements from the accounts of Rosbank, where the money of Rufond and the personal savings of the singer lay.

“This is a written confirmation that was used in court, confirmation that all the funds were withdrawn by her mother 10 days before her death,” Shepelev noted.
Dmitry was asked questions and checked the answers on a lie detector
// Photo: Frame from the program

During a lie detector test, Dmitry was asked who paid for the purchase of a country house, which took place at a time when Zhanna was already sick. According to Shepelev, they purchased a plot for two.

You will be interested! Igor Nikolaev's wife almost gave birth in a taxi

“Half the house and half the land belongs to me. The purchase was made jointly. The repair was carried out with my money, ”the presenter said, answering questions from experts.

A few days before the release of the program, Andrei Malakhov met with Zhanna's father, Vladimir Friske, to listen to his position. The artist's dad claims that Shepelev did not give a penny of money, but constantly only withdrew funds from the card.

“He is arrogant, he doesn’t consider people for anyone at all. A man who went from rags to riches. Now he has eight guards,” Vladimir Borisovich noted.

“All accounts are empty. These are dry banking statistics, ”Shepelev answered this.
Dmitry explained the situation with money
// Photo: Frame from the program

According to the journalist, Jeanne's parents also reset their daughter's personal accounts. “It doesn’t fit in my head how, seeing a dying daughter, you can go to the bank and think about money. I don’t understand this, ”Dmitry emphasized.

In an exclusive report, Shepelev showed the house that they bought with Zhanna. At the moment no one lives there. According to the man, the artist herself was there twice.

“It was a remarkable day. It was winter. We had a small picnic at the entrance to the house, drank homemade wine, ate barbecue, told different stories, ”Dmitry recalled about his second trip to the site.

“The son was not only left without a mother due to tragic circumstances, but also due to human stupidity and greed was left without a home,” the TV journalist said.
The house that was purchased by Zhanna and Dmitry
// Photo: Frame from the program

According to the latest data, the cottage now has four owners. In addition to Dmitry and Plato, Olga Vladimirovna and Vladimir Borisovich Friske have rights to the house. “I don’t need anything else, I want my son to live in peace,” said the TV presenter.

Jeanne's father claims that they will go to great lengths to see their grandson more often.

“I will fight for Plato. What right does he have to take Plato away from us. This is our blood there, ”said Friske.
Vladimir Friske accuses Dmitry of withdrawing money from accounts
// Photo: Frame from the program

Dmitry claims that he does not forbid grandparents to see their grandson. On the detector, he honestly admitted that the last meeting took place three weeks ago. “The essence of the conflict lies in the fact that grandparents do not want to go to their grandson,” Shepelev said. Natalya Friske about the meeting of the family with Plato: “He seems to have recognized us”

You will be interested! Dana Borisova was hospitalized

According to the TV presenter, in the future he plans to explain the current situation to the child. “Regardless of who says: me or Jeanne's parents, pain speaks in us, this must also be allowed for. And you need to believe only in your own heart and confidence that it is needed and loved. I hope that this disgusting story will not affect him in any way, ”Shepelev said.

According to the presenter, he constantly tells the boy about his mother. Dmitry would like Plato to be proud of his parents in the future.

“Plato’s time for endless whys has come. I answer these questions 1000 times a day... I speak to him directly. He knows about everything: he knows his mother's voice, he knows what mother looks like. By the way, he was in our house and asks: “When will we live in our house?” Shepelev said.

For Plato, mother is still alive in songs, films and in his heart. Shepelev condemns the current situation. According to the TV presenter, the boy's last communication with the Friske family was very tense.

“It was very hard. After the meeting, Plato had a fever. I called the doctor. He told me that it was an emotional reaction to this meeting. That is why I insist that a psychologist be present at the meetings, ”Shepelev said.
One of the last photos of Jeanne with her son
// Photo: Frame from the program

According to Zhanna's common-law spouse, all lawsuits were filed by the Friske family. The court ruled that they could see Plato for an hour and a half a month. The mother of the deceased singer has a different idea of ​​the whole situation. The program showed an excerpt from another program with the participation of Olga Vladimirovna, in which she talks about her grandson.

“We met in the psychologist's office in the presence of the nanny, Dima. We were still guarded by eight guards. It was 30-35 minutes,” the woman recalls.

A strong resonance was caused by the conflict between Vladimir Borisovich and Dmitry Shepelev, when a serious fight almost arose between them. “He looks down on people. They are like manure for him, ”said Papa Frisk about the TV presenter.

You will be interested! Alina Kabaeva attracted the attention of Italians with a transparent dress

According to Shepelev himself, he admits that the singer's father can kill him. This TV journalist admitted during a lie detector test. Polygraph examiner Roman Ustyuzhanin, who worked with Dmitry, commented on his answers.

“On the issue of money, we have no questions for Dima. He answered it honestly. The issue with the grandson was removed by itself, because the court made a decision, ”the expert said.
Dmitry received threats in telephone conversations
// Photo: Frame from the program

The editors of the program showed a conversation between Vladimir Frike and Dmitry Shepelev. According to this conversation, the journalist was threatened. The TV presenter turned to law enforcement agencies, but he was refused to initiate a case regarding the words about the murder. Dmitry does not want to deal with the involvement of the court, as he is worried about the future of his son.

“For Jeanne's parents, I am like a red rag to a bull. In their eyes, the reason for the loss of their daughter is me, ”said Dmitry.

At the end of the program, they showed how Shepelev pleased Plato. The TV presenter prepared a surprise for the boy. Plato is very fond of motorcycles and on the street an iron horse decorated with balls was waiting for him.

“I’ll tell everyone in the kindergarten,” said the contented child.
Plato studies a motorcycle
// Photo: Frame from the program

Many were waiting for an answer to two main questions: did Dmitry really love Zhanna and did he regret that on the day of his death he was not next to her. The TV journalist really cannot forgive himself for being absent at that moment. Then he and Plato flew away to the sea.

“I love her even today,” Shepelev said, answering a question about feelings for the singer. On this topic

• Dmitry Shepelev found a new place on TV
• Natalya Friske about the meeting of the family with Plato: “He seems to have recognized us”
• The Friske family is on the warpath
• Dmitry Shepelev in "Let them talk": the first interview on television

From new

• Dana Borisova suddenly returned to Moscow
• Vladimir Putin recalled his father's struggle with a serious illness
• Photo of Alla Pugacheva in a swimsuit blew up the Network
• Vladimir Putin announced the birth of a grandson
• "Gosh, aka Goga, aka Zhora": in memory of Alexei Batalov

youtube.com

TV presenter Dmitry Shepelev passed a lie detector test specifically for filming the talk show "Let them talk." The release of the program was timed to coincide with the two-year anniversary of the death of his former common-law wife, singer Zhanna Friske. All this time, the country was shaken by scandals related to Shepelev and Friske's parents: either Father Vladimir Friske said that Shepelev left Zhanna for another woman before her death, then he accused the host of meeting their grandson Plato, then he claimed that it was Shepelev who strangely removed 20 million rubles from the card of the deceased singer.

Youtube.com

Shepelev agreed to be tested on the detector in order to put an end to the rumors that did not allow him to live in peace all these two years. On the air, they showed how the TV presenter was tested. According to the agreement that Friske herself made with Rusfond, all the money that remained after her treatment (even in the event of death) was to go to the treatment of seriously ill children. Shepelev claims that her mother withdrew the entire amount from the account 10 days before Zhanna's death. The polygraph confirmed that Dmitry was not lying.

Youtube.com

In addition, the showman said that he never prevented the parents of the deceased wife from seeing their grandson, as they say. The essence of the conflict is that grandparents do not want to go to their grandson, but ask to be brought to them.

Now their dates are scheduled by the court. But even before the trial, I did not forbid them to communicate. But Zhanna's parents do not want to go to their grandson, they want me to take Plato, like a dog, to them outside the city.

During a lie detector test, Dmitry was asked who paid for the purchase of a country house, which took place at a time when Jeanne was already sick. According to Shepelev, they purchased a plot for two. Thus, half of the house and half of the land belongs to him, the other half to Jeanne Friske. Partial repairs in the house were made with Shepelev's money. However, he cannot enter there: the rights to the second half of the building passed after the death of Zhanna to her parents - and they are against Shepelev living there.

1tv.ru

One of the questions to Shepelev from experts was: “Are you afraid that Vladimir Friske will kill you?” Shepelev thought for a few seconds and confidently answered: "Yes." Indeed, “Let them talk” aired an audio recording of Shepelev’s conversation with Vladimir Borisovich, during which the latter shouted into the phone: “Otherwise I’ll order you! I swear I will! I'm not afraid of anything anymore!" By the way, the father, Vladimir Friske, was also invited to the program to pass the lie detector. At first the man agreed, and then stated that he did not have time for this in his schedule.

Many in the studio admitted that Vladimir Borisovich clearly has a borderline condition, and it is really fraught to allow little Plato to communicate with a person with such shattered nerves. At the end of the broadcast, the audience asked Shepelev whether he really loved Jeanne and whether he regretted that he was not next to her on the day of his death. The TV journalist admitted that he still regrets that he was absent on the day of her death - then he and Plato flew to the sea to Bulgaria. Answering a question about feelings for the singer, Dmitry admitted: "I love her today."

• Talk that Shepelev met with someone else during the life of Zhanna Friske existed before. So, on the air of one popular talk show with an unexpected statement spoke friend of the singer Alena Kravets. She stated that Shepelev cheated on his bride, the mother of their common son Plato. According to the woman, he got himself a mistress during the life of the singer. True, she refused to provide any evidence for her words.

• The total amount of donations for brain cancer patient Friske amounted to 69.2 million rubles. At the request of Jeanne, 32.6 million were sent to pay for the treatment of nine children with cancer.

• Russian law does not allow charitable foundations to keep targeted donations in their bank accounts for more than a year. Therefore, the money for continuing treatment - the remaining 25 million - was transferred to the singer's personal bank account under an agreement with her. Friske's relatives refused to provide Rusfond with documents confirming that the donations were used to pay for medical services.

Famous singer Zhanna Friske. She was loved by the whole country, huge sums of money were collected for her treatment, but to this day the issue of the collected money is the subject of litigation. Zhanna's father Vladimir Friske and husband Dmitry Shepelev - you will see the whole truth as it is, in fact, right now. Watch the issue Let them talk - Shepelev and Friske. Actually 07/20/2017 (repeat broadcast from 06/19/2017)

For almost 2 years, the relatives of the deceased Zhanna Friske have not been able to share her son Plato in any way. Earlier, in one of the programs, Dmitry Shepelev stated that he and his child were in danger from Vladimir Friske. The media called this conflict "an all-Russian story of deceit." Until now, no one can understand which of the two is telling the truth and which is lying. Zhanna Friske's father is sure that Shepelev stole 20 million rubles, which were collected by Rusfond and Channel One for the treatment of the singer. Moreover, Vladimir Borisovich claims that Dmitry has already built a luxurious country house with this money.

But here is what Shepelev himself says: "For a long time, the Zhanna family lied to everyone about where this money is." The program "Let them talk" invited the father and wife of the singer to take a lie detector. Thus, today it will become clear which of them is telling the truth, and which is deceiving millions of people all this time.

Let them say - Shepelev and Friske. In fact

A TV presenter and showman came to the program:

- I didn't sleep all night. Now I am very worried. It is very unpleasant for me that this whole story, the story of Zhanna, is still being discussed and they cannot leave her alone. All this is discussed and condemned. People come up to me on the street and say that they are on my side. Or other people who are opposed to me come up. Yes, there are questions that are still in the air and have not been answered. Today I would like to answer any of the questions and put an end to it once and for all.

Who stole the money? Is it true that Dmitry built himself a mansion? Before the broadcast of the program, Shepelev passed a lie detector test and at the end of the broadcast you will find out the results of this test.

- I am convinced that the money collected for Zhanna's treatment was withdrawn by her family. This is not just money - they should not be treated like pieces of paper! People from all over Russia and around the world gathered them to help Jeanne. This is a love of all people and you need to answer for this money. There is an extract from the bank (Rosbank), in which Rusfond kept this money. 10 days before Jeanne's death, this money was withdrawn by her mother.

- As for the country house: it was bought with my money. Zhanna and I bought a house and land in equal shares. I paid for the further repairs of the house and only at my own expense.

Friske and Shepelev: who is telling the truth?

The film crew Let them talk met with Zhanna Friske's father and this is what he said before the broadcast:

- Citizen Shepelev went to Los Angeles, took Zhanna there for 7 days, when she was already completely ill. And then after returning, he left her to die. For 2 years of her illness, he did not give a penny for her treatment! He withdrew 15 million on the first day, and after 2 days - 3 million 596 thousand rubles. He is arrogant and doesn't care about people. Came here from rags to riches. Today he has security, but what money does he live on if he does not work anywhere?

Dmitry Shepelev comments on what Vladimir Friske said:

- In addition to this money, Jeanne's personal accounts were also cleaned. Thus, the parents left Plato without an inheritance. I still cannot understand how, seeing a dying daughter, you can go to the bank and withdraw money?

Guests of the program: actress Elena Proklova, singer Irina Saltykova, intrapsychologist Maria Conte, lawyer Alexander Dobrovinsky, writer Oleg Roy, doctor and TV presenter Konstantin Ivanov and others. In fact, the broadcast is from July 20, 2017 (07/20/2017).

Like( 28 ) Dislike(22 )

15.09.2017 11:00

For the past two months, Dmitry Shepelev has been hosting the show “Actually”. As conceived by the project, the stars and other participants are checked on a lie detector. The program has high ratings, but guests complain that there are a lot of lies in the First Channel show.

So, the singer Aziza participated in one of the episodes of the program. The issue was dedicated to the tragic death of Igor Talkov. At the very end, the experts of the show asked Aziza what she was silent about, to which the artist replied that she was honest. However, according to the polygraph, it turned out that she did not finish speaking.

Aziza has information that she hides, but which was not asked, ”-experts said.

Aziza tried to justify herself, but in the end Shepelev still concluded that the case of Igor Talkov remained unsolved.

I don't care about the polygraph. Moreover, all this is profanity and a show. Both the presenter and the experts play their roles in a well-directed production. I was asked to come there by Igor Talkov, Jr., we are friends, and I came. But for some reason he was never called to the studio. This disrespect is not even to Igor, but to the memory of his father, ” Aziza shared her impressions. Her words are quoted by the TV program.

The key idea is to separate truth from lies. This talk show began as a confrontation between once close people whose relationship was broken, but not completely broken by lies, as an opportunity for the first time in a long time to speak frankly, ask vital questions and get truthful answers. In our studio it is impossible to lie - the characters are connected by sensors to the polygraph. This turns each program into a psychological thriller.

I feel like I belong. The events of the past few years have literally turned my life upside down. There were a lot of lies around, a lot of betrayal and hypocrisy. Crowd condemnation. Therefore, I know better than anyone how important it is sometimes to find out the truth, to explain to the world, how important it is to be heard.

By the way, I myself suggested that we be the first to be tested on a polygraph and answer the questions that our “colleagues” have been savoring for years. And after that, I think that I have every right to ask frank questions to my guests. I am very proud of this program. Over the summer, we managed to beat the ratings not only of our old direct competitors (share of 18% - Ed.), but also the ratings of our new rivals - former colleagues on Channel One.

I heard that it is still possible to fool the detector. The whole point is how to answer the questions.

I don't know how to fool the detector. I think it's impossible. Before recording the program, our heroes undergo preliminary polygraph testing. This is a long process. And it is only in the studio during the shooting that we will finally find out which of what they said is true and which is a lie.

Experts ask a lot of additional questions. An irrefutable truth is formed from a multitude of answers, so it is impossible to deceive a polygraph. Even if someone manages to "skip" the first question, the additional ones will still lead to clean water. Therefore, often polygraph examiners do not immediately issue a verdict, but ask additional questions.

By the way, the hero is watched not only by a polygraph examiner - a specialist in working with a polygraph, but also by a profiler who analyzes emotions, facial expressions of the hero of the program, his speech, signs that are invisible to an inexperienced observer, by which you can always understand: a person is lying or telling the truth. Sometimes they are joined by a forensic specialist - a specialist who works with the motives of crimes. Believe me, if our specialists take on a guest, he will not get out. Lying is impossible.

How do you manage to persuade people to participate in the program? What kind of technology do you use: torture, blackmail, bribery?

No matter how loud and pathetic it may sound, but the desire to be heard for many is much more important than anything else.

People want to defend their truth, and we help them in this.

You yourself have been in a similar position and you understand that it is very difficult to open up, to tell the details of your personal life in front of a large audience.

Yes, for me, the polygraph test and the need to talk about the personal became a severe shock. The first interview of this kind was dedicated to the release of my book Zhanna last autumn. And the second - on the eve of the airing of the project "Actually". It was damn hard. But I had the main help - the truth is on my side. Therefore, agreeing to this conversation was not easy, but telling the truth turned out to be a great relief. Psychologists know how reticence and lies destroy human destinies.

But are you sure you pay people money to participate?

Do you really think that money is the decisive argument for our man? Seeking justice is a much stronger motive.

An actor participated in one of the first programs. After all that this man has done, doesn't he make you feel disgusted? Why broadcast to such people?

Speaking about me, the last few years have greatly reshaped me, I, in principle, try not to judge or condemn.

Within the framework of the program, I am not interested in moralizing - it is not for me to decide what is good and what is bad. My personal task is to try to understand the guest.

And if a criminal comes to the studio, I will ask: why? And I'll try to hear it. It doesn't mean justify.

In the program "" with said that "television of Botox, silicone and davalok with vodka on the bottom" is a thing of the past. People are tired of it. It seems to me that Dibrov is mistaken. This kind of TV will never go away. And what do you think about this?

I am convinced that television should remain socially significant. In my opinion, the story of the "crystal boy" Sasha Pushkarev is more important than the story of expensive gifts for Anna Kalashnikova, because it appeals to the heart, is an example of perseverance, dignity!

We called Dibrov after the recording you mentioned. We talked for a long time. I agree with Dmitry's arguments: the topic can be anything everyday: “silicone and botox”, unequal marriage, betrayal, rape, illegitimate children. It's all vital.

Our task is television, as I see it, and the skill is to turn life history not into washing dirty linen, but into literature.