Yevgeny Bazarov is buried in this grave. The symbolic meaning of Bazarov's death

It is a pity for the lost, wasted strength ...
I. S. Turgenev

In 1874, Vasily Grigorievich Perov painted the painting "At the Rural Cemetery". Anyone who has read Turgenev's Fathers and Sons will recognize in it the tragic scene at the end of the novel: “There is a small rural cemetery in one of the remote corners of Russia... An iron fence surrounds the grave; two young Christmas trees are planted at both ends: Yevgeny Bazarov is buried in this grave... The flowers growing on it look serenely... at us with their innocent eyes... they speak... of eternal reconciliation and endless life. .."

The picture was written 12 years after Turgenev's novel, but it seems that it was inspired by a direct fresh impression from reading Fathers and Sons. The lonely figures of two old men, frozen at the grave of their son, seem to be written off from the parents of Bazarov - Vasily Ivanovich and Arina Vlasyevna. And the grave in the picture is so similar to the one that Turgenev described! Looking at this picture, I cannot help but think about the fate of Yevgeny Bazarov, about his such a short life and death ...

At the end of the novel, Bazarov speaks with pain about the brevity of human existence: “The narrow place that I occupy is so tiny in comparison with the main space ... and the part of the time that I manage to live is so insignificant before eternity.” Bazarov has not yet uttered the words about "eternal reconciliation", but they are already felt in the "Bazarov" longing, in his "strange fatigue", homelessness. Everything is directed towards one center - the disclosure of Bazarov's melancholy. Bazarov suddenly responds to his father's proposal to heal the peasants, in a speech about the "imminent liberation of the peasants." The long-established critical view of the backward Russian countryside torments the former "denier". Bazarov strives, although not without irony, to understand the peasants, their attitude to the "future of Russia", to the "new era of history." But to no avail: the peasants did not recognize him as their own.

Not without reason, it seems that Bazarov is losing faith in the future that he saw. True, his reasoning is still a little bit, but similar to the speeches of the “maximalist Bazarov”: “... take yourself by the crest and pull yourself out like a radish from a garden ...” And he pulls himself out of an environment alien to him, first internally separates, then he goes to his parents' house. He was finally disappointed in the "soft" Arcadia, he is looking everywhere for "real people", but does not find them. Loneliness leads Bazarov to tragic doubts. As a result, the hero’s judgment arises, which for a long time could not be forgiven to the author of the novel: “But I hated this last peasant, for whom I have to climb out of my skin and who won’t even thank me ... and why should I thank him ?! » Each replica of Bazarov is a bunch of mental suffering: “... I fell under the wheel. The old joke is death, but it’s new for everyone ... I did ... think: I’ll break off a lot of things, I won’t die, where! There is a task, because I am a giant! And now the whole task of the giant is how to die decently ... "

In the face of death, the best qualities of Bazarov are manifested: courage, tenderness for parents, hidden under external severity; poetic love for Odintsova; thirst for life, work, heroism, willpower ... D. I. Pisarev considered the scene of Bazarov's death to be the strongest in the novel. It seems to most clearly express the attitude of the author to the hero: admiration for his mental fortitude, mournful feelings caused by the death of such a wonderful person. material from the site

In the face of death, the pillars that once supported Bazarov's self-confidence turned out to be weak. The dying Bazarov is simple and humane, he atones for the one-sidedness of his life program with death. Bazarov is a man who, by his fate, has embodied all the costs of nihilistic theories. As D. I. Pisarev wrote: “Unable to show us how Bazarov lives and acts, Turgenev showed how he dies ...” This type of person only took shape and could only be completed by time. “To die the way Bazarov died is the same as accomplishing a great feat ...” Pisarev rightly noted.

Two great loves consecrate Bazarov's grave - parental and national. The memory of the deceased Bazarov, as it were, is concentrated in the ever-living, "endless life." A more refined form of farewell to Bazarov and bequeathing his experience to future generations probably does not exist. Bazarov’s reconciliation with life did not come, at the end of the path calm came, but the rebellious spirit continued to live in Bazarov until his last breath ...

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page, material on the topics:

• Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev rural cemetery
• a brief description of the cemetery in the painting by Perov
• from the novel fathers and sons rural kladvisha
• rural cemetery in the novel fathers and sons
• bazarov's grave author's attitude

The novel "Fathers and Sons" by I.S. Turgenev ends with the death of the main character. Understanding the reasons why the author ends his work in this way is possible through an analysis of the episode "Bazarov's death". "Fathers and Sons" is a novel in which the death of the protagonist is certainly not accidental. Perhaps such an ending speaks of the failure and convictions of this character. So, let's try to figure it out.

Who is Bazarov?

An analysis of the episode of Bazarov's death is impossible without understanding what this character is like. Thanks to what is told about Eugene in the novel, we imagine a smart, self-confident, cynical young man who denies generally accepted moral principles and ideals. He considers love to be "physiology", in his opinion, a person should not depend on anyone.

Subsequently, however, Turgenev reveals to us in his hero such qualities as sensitivity, kindness, and the ability for deep feelings.

Bazarov is a nihilist, that is, a person who denies all generally accepted values, including he does not share the enthusiasm of amateurs. In his opinion, only that which brings practical benefit is significant. Everything beautiful he considers meaningless. Eugene designates his main "work for the benefit of society." His task is "to live for the great goal of renewing the world."

Attitude towards others

An analysis of the episode of Bazarov's death in Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" cannot be carried out without understanding how the relationship of the protagonist with the people who made up his social circle was built. It should be noted that Bazarov treated others with contempt, he put others lower than himself. This was manifested, for example, in the things he said to Arkady about himself and his relatives. Attachment, sympathy, tenderness - all these feelings Eugene considers unacceptable.

Lyubov Bazarova

An analysis of the episode of Bazarov's death requires mentioning that, with all his disdain for lofty feelings, he, ironically, falls in love. His love is unusually deep, as evidenced by the explanation with Anna Sergeevna Odintsova. Realizing that he is capable of such a feeling, Bazarov ceases to treat him as physiology. He begins to consider the existence of love possible. Such a change of views could not pass without a trace for Eugene, who lived with the ideas of nihilism. His former life is destroyed.

Bazarov's explanation of love is not just words, it is a recognition of his own defeat. Eugene's nihilistic theories are shattered.

Turgenev considers it inappropriate to end the novel with a change in the views of the protagonist, but decides to end the work with his death.

Bazarov's death - an accident?

So, in the finale of the novel, the main event is the death of Bazarov. Analysis of the episode requires remembering the reason why, according to the text of the work, the main character dies.

His life becomes impossible due to an unfortunate accident - a small cut that Bazarov received during the autopsy of the body of a peasant who died of typhus. Ironically, he, a doctor doing a useful job, cannot do anything to save his life. The realization that he was going to die gave the protagonist time to evaluate his accomplishments. Bazarov, aware of the inevitability of his death, is calm and strong, although, of course, being a young and energetic person, he regrets that there is so little left to live.

Bazarov's attitude to death and to himself

An analysis of the episode of Bazarov's death is impossible without a deeper understanding of how the hero relates to the proximity of his end and death in general.

Not a single person can calmly realize the approaching end of his life. Eugene, being a man, certainly strong and self-confident, is no exception. He regrets that he did not fulfill his main task. He understands the power of death and speaks of the approaching last minutes with bitter irony: "Yes, go ahead, try to deny death. It denies you, and that's it!"

So, the death of Bazarov is approaching. Analysis of the episode, which is one of the key ones in the novel, needs to understand how the character of the protagonist has changed. Eugene becomes kinder and more sentimental. He wants to meet his beloved, once again to say about his feelings. Bazarov is softer than before, treats his parents, now understanding their importance.

An analysis of the episode of Bazarov's death shows how lonely the protagonist of the work is. He does not have a close person to whom he could convey his beliefs, therefore, his views have no future.

Understanding True Values

In the face of death they change. Understanding what is really important in life comes.

An analysis of the episode “The Death of Bazarov” based on the novel by I. S. Turgenev requires an understanding of what values ​​the protagonist now considers to be true.

The most important thing for him now is his parents, their love for him, as well as his feelings for Odintsova. He wants to say goodbye to her, and Anna, not afraid to get infected, comes to Evgeny. With her, Bazarov shares his innermost thoughts. He comes to the understanding that Russia does not need it at all, it needs those who do their usual work every day.

It is harder for Bazarov to come to terms with his death than for any other person, because he is an atheist and does not believe in life after death.

Turgenev ends his novel with the death of Bazarov. The principles by which the hero lived are destroyed. Stronger, new ideals did not appear in Bazarov. Turgenev notes that it was precisely the deep commitment to nihilism that killed the protagonist, which forced him to abandon the universal values ​​that allow him to live in this world.

The ideas of nihilism have no future;

Let later, but the epiphany of the hero, awakening: human nature prevails over an erroneous idea;

Bazarov seeks not to show his suffering, to console his parents, to prevent them from seeking solace in religion.

The mention of Sitnikov and Kukshina is a confirmation of the absurdity of the ideas of nihilism and its doom;

The life of Nikolai Petrovich and Arkady is an idyll of family happiness, far from public disputes (a variant of the noble path in future Russia);

The fate of Pavel Petrovich – the result of a life ruined by empty love affairs (without a family, without love, away from the Motherland);

The fate of Odintsova is a variant of a fulfilled life: the heroine marries a man who is one of the future public figures of Russia;

The description of Bazarov's grave is a declaration of the eternity of nature and life, the temporality of empty social theories that claim to be eternity, the futility of the human desire to know and change the world, the greatness of nature compared to the vanity of human life.

Evgeny Vasilyevich Bazarov is the protagonist of the novel. Initially, the reader only knows about him that he is a medical student who has come to the village for the holidays. First, Bazarov visits the family of his friend Arkady Kirsanov, then he goes with him to the provincial city, where he meets Anna Sergeevna Odintsova, lives for some time in her estate, but after an unsuccessful declaration of love he is forced to leave and, finally, ends up in his parents' house, where he was heading from the beginning. He does not live long in the estate of his parents, longing drives him away and forces him to repeat the same route once again. In the end, it turns out that there is no place for him anywhere. Bazarov returns home again and soon dies.

The basis of the actions and behavior of the hero is his commitment to ideas. nihilism. Bazarov calls himself a “nihilist” (from the Latin nihil, nothing), that is, a person who “recognizes nothing, respects nothing, treats everything from a critical point of view, does not bow to any authorities, does not accept a single principle faith, no matter how respected this principle may be. He categorically denies the values ​​of the old world: its aesthetics, social order, the laws of life of the aristocracy; love, poetry, music, the beauty of nature, family ties, such moral categories as duty, right, duty. Bazarov acts as a merciless opponent of traditional humanism: in the eyes of the “nihilist”, humanistic culture turns out to be a refuge for the weak and timid, creating beautiful illusions that can serve as their justification. The "nihilist" opposes the humanistic ideals with the truths of natural science, which affirm the cruel logic of life-struggle.

Bazarov is shown outside the environment of like-minded people, outside the sphere of practical work. Turgenev speaks of Bazarov's readiness to act in the spirit of his democratic convictions - that is, to destroy in order to make room for those who will build. But the author does not give him the opportunity to act, because, from his point of view, Russia does not yet need such actions.

Bazarov fights against the old religious, aesthetic and patriarchal ideas, mercilessly ridicules the romantic deification of nature, art and love. He affirms positive values ​​only in relation to the natural sciences, based on the conviction that man is a “worker” in the workshop of nature. A person appears to Bazarov as a kind of bodily organism and nothing more. According to Bazarov, society is to blame for the moral shortcomings of individuals. With the right organization of society, all moral diseases will disappear. Art for the hero is a perversion, nonsense.

Bazarov's test of love for Odintsova."Romantic nonsense" considers Bazarov and the spiritual refinement of love feelings. The story of Pavel Petrovich's love for Princess R. is not introduced into the novel as an interstitial episode. He is a warning to the arrogant Bazarov

In a love collision, Bazarov's beliefs are tested for strength, and it turns out that they are imperfect, cannot be accepted as absolute. Now Bazarov’s soul is splitting into two halves - on the one hand, we see the denial of the spiritual foundations of love, on the other hand, the ability to passionately and spiritually love. Cynicism is being replaced by a deeper understanding of human relationships. A rationalist who denies the power of true love, Bazarov is seized by a passion for a woman who is alien to him both in social status and in character, so seized that failure plunges him into a state of depression and longing. Rejected, he won a moral victory over a selfish woman from the noble circle. When he sees the complete hopelessness of his love, nothing causes him love complaints and requests. He painfully feels the loss, leaves for his parents in the hope of being healed of love, but before his death he says goodbye to Odintsova as to the beauty of life itself, calling love a "form" of human existence.

The nihilist Bazarov is capable of truly great and selfless love, striking us with depth and seriousness, passionate tension, integrity and strength of heartfelt feelings. In a love conflict, he looks like a large, strong personality, capable of a real feeling for a woman.

Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov. Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov - aristocrat, Angloman, liberal. In essence, the same doctrinaire as Bazarov. The very first difficulty - unrequited love - made Pavel Petrovich incapable of anything. A brilliant career and secular successes are interrupted by tragic love, and then the hero finds a way out in giving up hopes for happiness and in fulfilling his moral and civic duty, Pavel Petrovich moves to the village, where he tries to help his brother in his economic transformations and advocates liberal government reforms. Aristocracy, according to the hero, is not a class privilege, but a high social mission of a certain circle of people, a duty to society. An aristocrat should be a natural supporter of freedom and humanity.

Pavel Petrovich appears in the novel as a convinced and honest man. but clearly limited. Turgenev shows that his ideals are hopelessly far from reality, and his position in life does not provide peace of mind even to himself. In the mind of the reader, the hero remains lonely and unhappy, a man of unfulfilled aspirations and an unfulfilled destiny. This, to a certain extent, brings him closer to Bazarov. Bazarov is a product of the vices of the older generation, his philosophy is the denial of the life attitudes of the "fathers". Turgenev shows that absolutely nothing can be built on denial, because the essence of life lies in affirmation, not denial.

Duel of Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich. For the insult inflicted on Fenechka, Pavel Petrovich challenged Bazarov to a duel. This is also the conflict node of the work. The duel completed and exhausted his social conflict, for after the duel Bazarov would forever part with both the Kirsanov brothers and Arkady. She, putting Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov in a situation of life and death, thereby revealed not separate and external, but the essential qualities of both. The true reason for the duel is Fenechka, in whose features Kirsanov Sr. found similarities with his fatal beloved Princess R. and whom he also secretly loved. It is no coincidence that both antagonists have feelings for this young woman. Unable to wrest true love from their hearts, they try to find some kind of surrogate for this feeling. Both heroes are doomed people. Bazarov is destined to die physically. Pavel Petrovich, having settled the marriage of Nikolai Petrovich with Fenechka, also feels like a dead man. The moral death of Pavel Petrovich is the departure of the old, the doom of the obsolete.

Arkady Kirsanov. In Arkady Kirsanov, the unchanging and eternal signs of youth and youth, with all the advantages and disadvantages of this age, are most openly manifested. Arkady's "nihilism" is a lively play of young forces, a youthful feeling of complete freedom and independence, an ease of attitude towards traditions and authorities. The Kirsanovs are equally far from both the noble aristocracy and the raznochintsy. Turgenev is interested in these heroes not from a political, but from a universal point of view. The ingenuous souls of Nikolai Petrovich and Arkady retain their simplicity and worldly unpretentiousness in the era of social storms and catastrophes.

Pseudonihilists Kukshin and Sitnikov. Bazarov is alone in the novel, he has no true followers. It is impossible to consider the successors of the work of the hero of his imaginary comrades-in-arms: Arkady, who, after his marriage, completely forgets about his youthful passion for fashionable free-thinking; or Sitnikova and Kukshina - grotesque images, completely devoid of the charm and conviction of the "teacher".

Kukshina Avdotya Nikitishna is an emancipated landowner, a pseudo-nihilist, cheeky, vulgar, frankly stupid. Sitnikov is a pseudo-nihilist, recommended to everyone as a "student" of Bazarov. He is trying to demonstrate the same freedom and harshness of judgments and actions as Bazarov's. But the resemblance to the "teacher" turns out to be parodic. Next to a truly new man of his time, Turgenev placed his caricatured “double”: Sitnikov’s “nihilism” is understood as a form of overcoming complexes (he is ashamed, for example, of his father-farmer, who profits from soldering the people, at the same time he is burdened by his human insignificance ).

The worldview crisis of Bazarov. Denying art and poetry, neglecting the spiritual life of a person, Bazarov falls into one-sidedness, without noticing it himself. By challenging the "damned barchuks", the hero goes too far. The denial of "your" art develops in him into a denial of art in general; the denial of "your" love - into the assertion that love is a "feigned feeling", explicable only by the physiology of the sexes; the denial of sentimental noble love for the people - in contempt for the peasant. Thus, the nihilist breaks with the eternal, enduring values ​​of culture, placing himself in a tragic situation. Failure in love led to a crisis in his worldview. Two riddles arose before Bazarov: the mystery of his own soul and the riddle of the world around him. The world, which seemed simple and understandable to Bazarov, becomes full of secrets.

So is this theory necessary for society and do you need to him this type of hero like Bazarov? The dying Yevgeny tries to meditate on this with bitterness. “Russia needs me... no. apparently not needed,” and he asks himself the question: “Yes, and who is needed?” The answer is unexpectedly simple: we need a shoemaker, a butcher, a tailor, because each of these inconspicuous people does their job, working for the benefit of society and without thinking about lofty goals. Bazarov comes to this understanding of truth on the verge of death.

The main conflict in the novel is not the dispute between "fathers" and "children", but internal conflict experienced by Bazarov, the demands of living human nature are incompatible with nihilism. Being a strong personality, Bazarov cannot renounce his convictions, but he is not able to turn away from the demands of nature either. The conflict is unresolvable, and the hero is aware of this.

Death of Bazarov. Bazarov's convictions come into tragic conflict with his human essence. He cannot give up his convictions, but he cannot stifle the awakened person in himself. For him there is no way out of this situation, and that is why he dies. The death of Bazarov is the death of his doctrine. The suffering of the hero, his untimely death is the necessary payment for his exclusivity, for his maximalism.

Bazarov dies young, without having time to start the activity for which he was preparing, without completing his work, alone, without leaving behind children, friends, like-minded people, not understood by the people and far from him. His great power is wasted. The gigantic task of Bazarov remained unfulfilled.

In the death of Bazarov, the political views of the author were manifested. Turgenev, a true liberal, a supporter of the gradual, reformist transformation of Russia, an opponent of all revolutionary explosions, did not believe in the prospects of the revolutionary democrats, could not place great hopes on them, perceived them as a great force, but transient, believed that they would very soon come down from historical arena and will give way to new social forces - gradualist reformers. Therefore, the revolutionary democrats, even if they were smart, attractive, honest, like Bazarov, seemed to the writer tragic loners, historically doomed.

The dying scene and the scene of Bazarov's death is the most difficult exam for the right to be called a man and the most brilliant victory of the hero. “To die as Bazarov died is the same as doing a great feat” (D. I. Pisarev). Such a person who knows how to die calmly and firmly will not retreat in the face of an obstacle and will not flinch in the face of danger.

The dying Bazarov is simple and humane, there is no need to hide his feelings, he thinks a lot about himself, about his parents. Before his death, he calls Odintsova to tell her with sudden tenderness: “Listen, I didn’t kiss you then ... Blow on the dying lamp and let it go out.” The very tone of the last lines, the poetic rhythmic speech, the solemnity of the words that sound like a requiem, emphasize the author's loving attitude towards Bazarov, the moral justification of the hero, regret for a wonderful person, the thought of the futility of his struggle and aspirations. Turgenev reconciles his hero with eternal existence. Only nature, which Bazarov wanted to turn into a workshop, and the parents who gave him life, surround him.

The description of Bazarov's grave is a statement of the eternity and grandeur of nature and life in comparison with the vanity, temporality, futility of social theories, human aspirations to know and change the world, and human mortality. Turgenev is characterized by subtle lyricism, this is especially evident in the descriptions of nature. In the landscape, Turgenev continues the traditions of the late Pushkin. For Turgenev, nature as such is important: aesthetic admiration for it.

Critics of the novel.“Did I want to scold Bazarov or exalt him? I don’t know this myself, because I don’t know whether I love him or hate him!” "My whole story is directed against the nobility as an advanced class." “The word “nihilist” that I issued was then used by many who were only waiting for an opportunity, a pretext to stop the movement that had taken possession of Russian society ...”. “I dreamed of a gloomy, wild, large figure, half grown out of the soil, strong, vicious, honest - and yet doomed to death because it still stands on the eve of the future” (Turgenev). Conclusion. Turgenev shows Bazarov inconsistently, but he does not seek to debunk him, to destroy him.

In accordance with the vectors of the struggle of social movements in the 60s, points of view on Turgenev's work were also lined up. Along with positive assessments of the novel and the protagonist in Pisarev's articles, negative criticism was also heard from the ranks of the Democrats.

Position M.A. Antonovich (article "Asmodeus of our time"). A very harsh position that denies the social significance and artistic value of the novel. In the novel "... there is not a single living person and living soul, but all are only abstract ideas and different directions, personified and called by their own names." The author is not disposed towards the younger generation and "he gives full preference to fathers and always tries to elevate them at the expense of children." Bazarov, according to Antonovich, is both a glutton, a talker, a cynic, a drunkard, a braggart, a pitiful caricature of youth, and the whole novel is a slander of the younger generation. Dobrolyubov had already died by this time, and Chernyshevsky was arrested, and Antonovich, who had a primitive understanding of the principles of "real criticism", took the original author's intention for the final artistic result.

The novel was more deeply perceived by the liberal and conservative part of society. Even here, however, there are extreme judgments.

The position of M.N. Katkov, editor of the Russky Vestnik magazine.

“What a shame it was for Turgenev to lower the flag in front of the radical and salute him as before a well-deserved warrior.” “If Bazarov is not elevated to apotheosis, then one cannot but admit that he somehow accidentally landed on a very high pedestal. He really suppresses everything around him. Everything in front of him is either rags or weak and green. Was such an impression to be desired? Katkov denies nihilism, considering it a social disease that must be fought by strengthening protective conservative principles, but notes that Turgenev puts Bazarov above all.

The novel in the assessment of D.I. Pisarev (article "Bazarov"). Pisarev gives the most detailed and detailed analysis of the novel. “Turgenev does not like merciless denial, and yet the personality of a merciless denier comes out as a strong personality and inspires involuntary respect in every reader. Turgenev is inclined towards idealism, and meanwhile, none of the idealists bred in his novel can be compared with Bazarov either in strength of mind or in strength of character.

Pisarev explains the positive meaning of the protagonist, emphasizes the vital importance of Bazarov; analyzes Bazarov's relationship with other heroes, determines their attitude to the camps of "fathers" and "children"; proves that nihilism got its start precisely on Russian soil; defines the originality of the novel. D. Pisarev's thoughts about the novel were shared by A. Herzen.

The most artistically adequate interpretation of the novel belongs to F. Dostoevsky and N. Strakhov (Vremya magazine). The views of F.M. Dostoevsky. Bazarov is a "theorist" who is at odds with "life", a victim of his dry and abstract theory. This is a hero close to Raskolnikov. Without considering the theory of Bazarov, Dostoevsky believes that any abstract, rational theory brings suffering to a person. Theory crashes against life. Dostoevsky does not talk about the causes that give rise to these theories. N.Strakhov noted that I.S. Turgenev "wrote a novel that was neither progressive nor retrograde, but, so to speak, everlasting." The critic saw that the author "stands for the eternal principles of human life," and Bazarov, who is "alienated from life," meanwhile, "lives deeply and strongly."

The point of view of Dostoevsky and Strakhov is quite consistent with the judgments of Turgenev himself in his article “On the occasion of Fathers and Sons”, where Bazarov is called a tragic person.

NOVEL CRIME AND PUNISHMENT (1866)

Genre originality. Dostoevsky's novel can be defined as both psychological and philosophical. All plots are depicted realistically, the social background is clearly marked, the inner world of the characters and their psychological conflicts are recreated in detail. it polyphonic novel. The principle of "polyphonism" (polyphony) or "dialogue" is that each character has his own independent inner world.

Issues. The hero of Dostoevsky acts as a "man of the idea", he is defenseless before the power of the idea. The idea is the central object of the author's image. The problem of "restoration of a dead person" in the epilogue of the novel.

Dispute of ideas in the novel. Dostoevsky's novel is a "novel of ideas".

1. Raskolnikov's ideology is set forth in the article "On Crime", the content of which we learn from Raskolnikov's dialogue with Porfiry Petrovich. The theory is painstaking, honest, it is merciless and true in its own way. The whole world is criminal, so there is no concept of crime. One class of people - "material", others - the elite, heroes or geniuses, they lead the crowd, fulfilling a historical necessity. To the question of Porfiry Petrovich, to which category he considers himself. Raskolnikov does not want to answer. All the events that preceded the murder (a letter from his mother, Sonya's story, reflections on "senseless victims", Raskolnikov's overheard conversation between a student and an officer about an old pawnbroker, meetings on the streets) serve for Raskolnikov to confirm the correctness of his theory.

2. The ideology of Svidrigailov. Svidrigailov preaches extreme individualism. Cruelty is inherent in man by nature, he is predisposed to commit violence against other people to satisfy his desires. This is the ideology of Raskolnikov, but without "humanistic" rhetoric (according to Raskolnikov, the mission of the "Napoleons" is to do good to humanity). It should not be forgotten that Svidrigailov's crimes are reported only in the form of "rumors", while he himself categorically denies most of them. The reader does not know for sure whether Svidrigailov committed them, this remains a mystery and gives the image of the hero a partly romantic (“demonic”) flavor. On the other hand, Svidrigailov performs almost more specific “good deeds” throughout the entire action of the novel than the rest of the characters. Thus, the author shows another facet of Svidrigailov's character, in support of the Christian idea that in any person there is both good and evil, and there is freedom of choice between good and evil.

3. The ideology of Porfiry Petrovich. Investigator Porfiry Petrovich acts as the main ideological antagonist and "provocateur" of Raskolnikov. He tries to refute the theory of the protagonist, but upon closer examination it turns out that Porfiry himself builds his relationship with Raskolnikov precisely according to the principles of this very theory: it was not for nothing that he became so interested in it. Porfiry seeks to psychologically destroy Raskolnikov, to achieve complete power over his soul. He calls Raskolnikov his victim. In the novel, he is compared to a spider chasing a fly. Porfiry belongs to the type of "psychologist provocateur" that is sometimes found in Dostoevsky's novels.

4. Luzhin's ideology. Luzhin represents the type of "acquirer" in the novel. The sanctimonious bourgeois morality embodied in Luzhin seems to Raskolnikov misanthropic. The meeting with Luzhin in a certain way affects the internal psychological process of Raskolnikov, it gives another impetus to the metaphysical rebellion of the hero: “Should Luzhin live and do abominations, or should Katerina Ivanovna die?”

The ideological and compositional role of Sonya's image. Sonya is almost the only non-ideological hero in the novel. She doesn't have any "theories" other than belief in God, but that's just a belief, not an ideology. Sonya never argues with Raskolnikov. Sonya suffers, but does not complain, it is impossible for her to commit suicide. At first, she makes an impression on Raskolnikov as "holy fool", "strange". Many researchers believe that Sonya is the embodiment of the author's ideal of Christian love, sacrificial suffering and humility. By her example, she shows the way to Raskolnikov - to restore lost ties with people through gaining faith and love.

Crime and Punishment Raskolnikov. The protagonist of Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment", a half-educated student, Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov, commits a terrible crime - taking the life of another person - under the influence of theories popular among young people in the 60s of the XIX century. Dostoevsky in his novel depicts the collision of theories with the logic of life. You can't live by theory.

Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov is a kind person and sensitive to the suffering of other people, a sympathetic, kind person by nature, painfully perceiving someone else's pain. Risking his life, he saves children from the flames, shares his meager pennies with the father of a deceased comrade, and gives the last money to the Marmeladov family. This is a gifted and honest young man, endowed with a sharp, inquisitive mind. But he is proud, unsociable, lonely, convinced of his exclusivity. His pride is wounded at every step - he hides from the hostess, whom he owes for a room, eats leftovers, appears on the street in rags, causing ridicule. Being "crushed by poverty" and not being able to help loved ones. Raskolnikov is looking for a way out and "falls ill with the idea" of transforming the world and society. Under the low ceiling of a beggar's kennel, a monstrous theory of crime was born in the mind of a hungry man. The world appears to Raskolnikov as imperfect, and the hero considers himself capable of correcting it. He dreams of protecting all the weak and disadvantaged, restoring the rights of the downtrodden and disenfranchised.

Thinking hard about the reasons for the unjust structure of society, Raskolnikov creates a theory according to which All mankind is divided into two categories: on ordinary people, who make up the majority and are forced to submit to force (“a trembling creature” is a crowd that is not able to change its position), and on extraordinary people (such as Napoleon), who are called upon to command the rest, the world moves through their efforts, progress . If it is necessary to remove interfering obstacles to achieve harmony, then a special person can allow himself to violate the moral law and "step over the corpse, through the blood." Such people are “allowed to bleed according to their conscience”, for them there are special criteria for good and evil. Dividing people into two categories, Raskolnikov refers the old woman to the “trembling creatures”, accepting silently and meekly any order of things. To the second, "the powers that be," to whom nothing is worth violating any moral norms, he refers not only Napoleon, Mohammed, but also himself. Going on a crime, he wanted to figure out what category of people he belongs to: “.. Am I a louse, like everyone else, or a man?”. “Here’s what: I wanted to become Napoleon, that’s why I killed,” Raskolnikov admits.

Vina Raskolnikov lies in the fact that he crosses those moral boundaries that a person, if he wants to remain a man, under no circumstances can cross. Raskolnikov could easily be acquitted if he killed because of poverty. Poverty pushed him to crime, the hero himself admits this. But Dostoevsky clearly showed Raskolnikov's desire to rise above the crowd. Money is not important to him, the main thing is to prove to yourself that you, like Napoleon and Mohammed, are able to rise above the crowd by killing. The main mistake of Rodion and his fault is that he forgot the most important thing: no one is given the right to take the lives of others. You can’t solve your problems at the expense of others, it’s better to suffer yourself than to make others suffer - this is the great moral meaning of the novel.

Rodion Raskolnikov is a man who, according to Christian concepts, is deeply sinful. This does not mean the sin of murder, but pride, dislike for people. The sin of murder, according to Dostoevsky, is secondary. Raskolnikov's crime is ignoring Christian commandments, and a person who, in his pride, managed to transgress, is capable of anything according to religious concepts. So, according to Dostoevsky, Raskolnikov commits the first, main crime before God, the second - murder - before people.

In the first part In the novel, Raskolnikov checks whether he can transcend generally accepted human laws, in particular, whether he is able to transcend someone else's life. Life facts, it would seem, confirm the correctness of his ideas (the fate of the Marmeladov family, the situation of mother and sister, street scenes, etc.). Raskolnikov commits a crime, by chance killing not only the "malicious louse" - the old pawnbroker, but also the innocent Lizaveta, and himself, as he himself later says.

The second part is like a disaster. Of all the sensations experienced by Raskolnikov after the murder (from animal joy that he had not been caught, to despair, had he left any evidence, had he spilled the beans?), the most excruciatingly strong, sudden and unforeseen was the feeling of "endless solitude and alienation." He experienced this feeling in the police office, on the Nikolaevsky bridge, and was especially acute when he met his mother and sister. Raskolnikov felt that by his crime he "as if with scissors" cut himself off from everyone and everything. When meeting with his relatives, an unbearable sudden consciousness hit him, "like thunder." He could not hug his mother and Dunechka: "the hands did not rise."

Scary Raskolnikov's dream about a horse being tortured by drunken men. This creature that he saw in a dream, beaten to death, innocent of anything, personified the soul of Raskolnikov, trampled by him, crippled by his own evil decisions. The mind, detached from the heart, destroys a person. Waking up from a terrible dream, Raskolnikov felt that he had thrown off the dead burden of criminal fabrications. The dream of a horse managed to reason with Raskolnikov only for a moment.

Raskolnikov's human nature does not accept alienation from people. It turns out that a person cannot live without communication, the hero's mental struggle is becoming more and more intense. Raskolnikov still believes in the infallibility of his idea and despises himself for his weakness, now and then calling himself a scoundrel. Dostoevsky proves that the very theory of "two categories" is criminal. This theory is not even a justification for the crime, but the crime itself, because from the very beginning it predetermines who will live and who will not live.

Plot and composition. The compositional ratio of the parts proves the secondary importance of the detective plot (one part is devoted to the commission of a crime, the rest to the search for truth and the problems of retribution).

First part– preparation and commission of a crime (correlation of parts: six chapters on the development of Raskolnikov's theory, the last chapter is devoted to the murder itself):

hero's life social prerequisites for the emergence of Raskolnikov's theory; Marmeladov's confession; drunk girl on the boulevard; a conversation between a student and an officer; mother's letter Raskolnikov's first dream is about killing a horse; committing a crime: the double murder of an old pawnbroker and her sister; the death of the innocent Lizaveta is the first "crack" in Raskolnikov's theory.

The second part– analysis of the state of the hero after the commission of the crime, acquaintance with the main characters:

morbid state of the hero: fear, suspicion. The culmination is a visit to the office, fainting; acquaintance with the "double" - Luzhin. Luzhin's repulsive theory elevated to a lifestyle; the death of Marmeladov; first meeting with Sonya; the second dream - about beating the landlady - is a reflection of Raskolnikov's state of mind.

The third part- discussions around Raskolnikov's theory, its confirmation and refutation:

the story of Raskolnikov's mother and sister about Svidrigailov. The image of the second "double" is a vice raised to the principle of life; the beginning of an intellectual duel with Porfiry Petrovich; the third dream is the re-experiencing of the murder, the appearance of the victim; the extreme strain of Raskolnikov's mental strength.

Fourth part- meetings and conversations that refute the theory of the hero:

discussions with Svidrigailov (confrontation between the devilish and the divine principles); Luzhin's theory - the theory of the master of life; Sonya and Raskolnikov: the proximity of destinies and the polarity of worldviews; the significance of the biblical story "The Resurrection of Lazarus" in the evolution of the views of the hero; dialogue-struggle with Porfiry Petrovich; Mikolka's confession is the formal release of the hero from suspicion.

Fifth part- life refutes Raskolnikov's theory:

the tragedy of the situation and the spiritual strength of Sonya; the tragedy of the fate of Katerina Ivanovna and children; recognition of Raskolnikov to Sonya (the soul could not stand it and is awaiting trial); Sonya is a judge and a savior.

Sixth part- the last struggle of a living soul and a dead theory:

meeting with Porfiry Petrovich in Raskolnikov's apartment. The conviction of the investigator in the guilt of the suspect, the refusal of the hero to come with a confession; Svidrigailov's suicide: a soul given to hell cannot live; recognition of Raskolnikov, lack of remorse.

The meaning of the epilogue- the resurrection of Raskolnikov's soul, the final victory of the divine over the devilish:

life in hard labor; the fourth dream is the world embodiment of the theory in life; rebirth to a new life, love for Sonya, return to people.

The system of images in relation to Raskolnikov's theory:

images of the humiliated and offended, confirming the injustice of this world (Marmeladov, Katerina Ivanovna);

Raskolnikov's twin images - in practical life they are guided by the theory "everything is permitted" (Svidrigailov, Luzhin);

images that refute Raskolnikov's theory (Dunechka, Razumikhin, Porfiry Petrovich, Sonechka Marmeladova).

The meaning of the image of Sonya Marmeladova in the fate of the hero and the conflict of the novel:

the proximity of the fate of Sonya and Raskolnikov (both crossed the line - a murderer and a harlot);

fundamental difference: ideological confrontation (Sonya, becoming a prostitute, saved her soul, the basis of her fall is sacrifice; Raskolnikov, having killed the old woman and Lizaveta, “killed himself”, the basis of his crime is pride and spiritual fall);

Sonya's role in Raskolnikov's repentance: her attitude to life, dialogues with Raskolnikov help the hero see the world again, understand that dividing people into two categories is immoral, criminal, move the hero to repentance and repentance.

Means of revealing the image:

portrait: “He was so poorly dressed that another, even a decent person, would be ashamed to go out into the street in such rags during the day”;

speaking name and surname (Rodion - family and he, Raskolnikov - split);

actions (helping other people, killing);

description of the psychological state of the hero (Raskolnikov's illness, feeling "cut off from the whole world", illogical actions);

dreams Raskolnikov - a reflection of his inner life;

monologues and dialogues of the hero;

relationships with other characters.

The image of Raskolnikov is a prototype of all kinds of "anti-heroes" and ideas of the 20th century, which proclaimed the idea of ​​​​the possibility for selected individuals to decide the fate of people and humanity.

The theme of the lesson is “Analysis of an episode from the novel “Fathers and Sons”.

Today in the lesson, in preparation for the exam, we will analyze an excerpt from the novel, prepare for the tasks of parts B and C, and find out the author's attitude to the main character of the novel.

On the screen and on the tables is an excerpt from the novel. Expressive reading of the passage by the teacher.

What is this passage? What is its place in the overall structure of the work?

(This is the epilogue of the novel. The last page of the novel. It is preceded by pages dedicated to the death of Bazarov and pages that tell about the fate of other heroes of the novel.)

What is the basis of the epilogue?

(A picture of a rural cemetery. 1/3 of the epilogue is occupied by pictures of nature.)

What is the usual role of landscape in art. work?

(Pictures of nature harmonize with the feelings and experiences of the hero or set them off.) Turgenev ends his novel with a philosophical description of nature. He had a philosophical education and even defended his dissertation.

In the artistic world of Turgenev, nature is often cruel to a person, capable of destroying his happiness or life.

Let's return to the text. Before us is a picture of a rural cemetery.

What is the tone of this passage? Is she changing?

(A description of a sad picture of a rural cemetery opens, but gradually the tone changes, from dreary notes the author gradually raises his voice to solemn pathos. Then again a mournful picture is a description of the suffering of the lonely old people of the Bazarovs.

What means of expression help convey the mood at the beginning of the passage?

Epithets: eternal peace reigns here, the view is sad.

Which conveys a feeling of neglect, abandonment?

Verbs: ditches are overgrown, wooden crosses are drooping and rotting, sheep roam freely over the graves, 2-3 plucked trees give a meager shade.

The description of the abandoned cemetery is interrupted by an ellipsis…. And here before our eyes is the grave of Bazarov.

Contrast.

What role does contrast play?

What other means of expression does the author use when drawing Bazarov's grave?

(Personification: “the flowers look at us serenely with their innocent eyes.” This technique allows the author to create an image of nature that lives its own life.

In addition to lexical ones, what other means of expression does the author use when describing Bazarov's grave?

(Means of syntax. Various types of constructions. SPP with one-way subordinate clauses: “But between them there is one that a person does not touch, which an animal does not trample on.” SBP: “An iron fence surrounds it; two young Christmas trees are planted at both ends: Yevgeny Bazarov is buried in this grave.) Thanks to these syntactic constructions, the tone changes, the lines begin to sound solemn.

Find another expression. a syntax tool that enhances the emotional sound of the text and helps to understand the author's thought.

(Rhetorical question: "Are their prayers, their tears fruitless? Isn't love, holy, devoted love, all-powerful?")

And then comes the exclamation - Oh no! No matter how passionate, sinful, rebellious the heart is hidden in the grave, the flowers growing on it serenely look at us with their innocent eyes: they tell us not only about eternal calmness, about that great calmness of “indifferent” nature; they also speak of eternal reconciliation and endless life.

In this last sentence there is another expressive device, which is a chain of definitions with a gradual increase in significance. Which?

(Gradation: Passionate, sinful, rebellious heart.)

In the same last sentence, we again observe a contrast. Where?

(On the one hand, a passionate, sinful, rebellious heart, and on the other, indifferent nature and flowers that look at us with their innocent eyes. They speak of eternal reconciliation and endless life.

But what kind of life? And about the reconciliation of whom with whom?

(Probably about the endless continuation of the life of nature. Man is mortal, and nature is eternal. Maybe about the eternity of human values. Or maybe the disputes between fathers and children are eternal, it is from these disputes and clashes that life consists.

About the reconciliation of man and nature, man with the world, with himself)

The epilogue is filled with deep philosophical meaning. It must be said that Turgenev does not give us an answer, he invites his readers to reflect.

Why do the last lines of the novel sound sad and at the same time majestic, solemn?

(In the last lines, the penetrating voice of the author sounds. This can only be said about a dear person. The author does not speak about the struggle, not about Bazarov’s rebellion, but about reconciliation. At the end of the novel, Turgenev loves his hero, sympathizes with him, mourns for him. “When I wrote the final lines, I was forced to tilt my head so that tears would not fall on the manuscript, ”wrote Turgenev.