Imagine that you, right now, were given proof of life after death, how your reality can change ... Read and think. Enough information to think about.

In the article:

The point of view of religion on the afterlife

Life after death… Sounds like an oxymoron, death is the end of life. Mankind has been haunted by the idea that the biological death of the body is not the end of human existence. What remains after the death of the camp, different nations in different periods of history had their own views, which also had common features.

Representations of tribal peoples

We cannot say for sure what views our prehistoric ancestors held, anthropologists have collected a sufficient number of observations of the current tribes, whose lifestyle has changed since the Neolithic. It is worth drawing some conclusions. During the period of physical death, the soul of the deceased leaves the body and replenishes the host of the spirits of the ancestors.

There were also spirits of animals, trees, stones. Man was not fundamentally separated from the surrounding universe. There was no place for the eternal rest of the spirits - they continued to live in that harmony, watching the living, assisting them in their affairs and helping with advice through intermediary shamans.

The deceased ancestors provided help disinterestedly: the natives, who did not know commodity-money relations, did not tolerate them even in communication with the world of spirits - the latter were content with respect.

Christianity

Thanks to the missionary activity of its adherents, it has embraced the universe. The denominations agreed that after death a person goes either to Hell, where a loving God will punish him forever, or to Paradise, where there is constant happiness and grace. Christianity - an independent topic, you can learn more about the afterlife.

Judaism

Judaism, from which Christianity "grew" has no idea about life after death, the facts are not presented, because no one returned back.

The Pharisees interpreted the Old Testament that there is an afterlife and retribution, and the Sadducees, confident that everything ends with death. A quotation from the Bible "... a living dog is better than a dead lion" Ek. 9.4. The book of Ecclesiastes was written by a Sadducee who did not believe in an afterlife.

Islam

Judaism is one of the Abrahamic religions. Is there life after death, clearly defined - yes. Muslims, to Paradise, the rest together to Hell. No appeals.

Hinduism

The world religion on earth tells a lot about the afterlife. According to beliefs, people after physical death go either to heavenly spheres, where life is better and longer than on Earth, or to hellish planets, where everything is worse.

One thing pleases: unlike Christianity, you can return to Earth from hellish spheres for exemplary behavior, and from heavenly ones you can fall again if something goes wrong for you. There is no eternal sentence for hellish torment.

Buddhism

Religion - from Hinduism. Buddhists believe that until you get enlightenment on earth and merge with the Absolute, the series of births and deaths is endless and is called "".

Life on earth is a continuous suffering, a person is overcome by his endless desires, and non-fulfillment makes him unhappy. Give up your cravings and you are free. It's right.

Mummies of Oriental monks

"Alive" 200-year-old mummy of a Tibetan monk from Ulaanbaatar

The phenomenon was discovered by scientists in southeast Asia, and today it is one of the evidence, indirectly, that a person is still alive after turning off all the functions of the camp.

The bodies of Eastern monks were not buried, but mummified. Not like the pharaohs in Egypt, but in natural conditions, they are created thanks to humid air with a positive temperature. For some time they still grow hair and nails. If in the corpse of an ordinary person this phenomenon is explained by the shrinkage of the shell and the visual lengthening of the nail plates, then in mummies they really grow back.

The energy-information field, which is measured by a thermometer, a thermal imager, a decimeter range receiver and other modern devices, these mummies have three or four times more than that of an average person. Scientists call this energy the noosphere, which allows the mummies to remain intact and maintain contact with the earth's information field.

Scientific evidence for life after death

If religious fanatics or just believers do not question what is written in the teachings, modern people with critical thinking doubt the truth of theories. When the hour of death approaches, a person is seized with a trembling fear of the unknown, and this prompts curiosity and a desire to find out what awaits us beyond the material world.

Scientists have found that death is a phenomenon characterized by a number of obvious factors:

• lack of heartbeat;
• cessation of any mental processes in the brain;
• stop bleeding and blood clotting;
• after a time after death, the body begins to stiffen and decompose, and a light, empty and dry shell remains from it.

Duncan McDougall

An American researcher named Duncan McDougall carried out an experiment at the beginning of the 20th century, where he found that the weight of the human body after death decreases by 21 grams. Calculations allowed him to conclude that the difference in mass - the weight of the soul leaves the body after death. The theory has been criticized, this is one of the works to find its evidence.

Researchers have found that the soul has a physical weight!

The idea of ​​what awaits us is surrounded by many myths and hoaxes that are created by charlatans posing as scientists. It is difficult to figure out where the truth or fiction is, confident theories can be questioned for lack of evidence.

Scientists continue to search and acquaint people with new research and experiments.

Ian Stevenson

Canadian-American biochemist and psychiatrist, author of "Twenty Cases of Alleged Reincarnations" Ian Stevenson conducted an experiment where he analyzed the stories of more than 2 thousand people who claimed to keep memories from past lives in their memory.

The biochemist expressed the theory that a person simultaneously exists on two levels of being - gross or physical, earthly, and subtle, that is, spiritual, non-material. Leaving the worn-out and unsuitable for further existence body, the soul goes in search of a new one. The end result of this journey is the birth of man on Earth.

Ian Stevenson

The researchers found out that every life lived leaves imprints in the form of moles, scars discovered after the birth of a child, physical and mental deformations. The theory is reminiscent of the Buddhist one: when dying, the soul reincarnates in another body, with already accumulated experience.

The psychiatrist worked with the subconscious of people: in the group they studied there were children who were born with defects. Introducing the wards into a trance state, he tried to get any information proving that the soul living in this body had found refuge earlier. One of the boys, in a state of hypnosis, told Stevenson that he had been hacked to death with an axe, and dictated the approximate address of his past family. Arriving at the indicated place, the scientist found people, one of the members of whose house was really killed with an ax hit on the head. The wound was reflected on the new body in the form of a growth on the back of the head.

The materials of Professor Stevenson's work give many people reason to believe that the fact of reincarnation is indeed scientifically proven, that the feeling of "déjà vu" is a memory from a past life, thrown to us by the subconscious.

Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky

K. E. Tsiolkovsky

The first attempt by Russian researchers to determine such a component of human life as the soul was the research of the famous scientist K. E. Tsiolkovsky.

According to the theory, absolute death in the universe cannot be by definition, and clots of energy, called the soul, consist of indivisible atoms endlessly wandering through the vast universe.

clinical death

Many consider the fact of clinical death to be modern evidence of life after death - a condition experienced by people, more often on the operating table. This topic was popularized in the 1970s by Dr. Raymond Moody, who published a book called Life After Death.

The descriptions of most of those interviewed agree:

• about 31% felt flying through the tunnel;
• 29% - saw a stellar landscape;
• 24% observed their own body in an unconscious state, lying on the couch, described the real actions of doctors at that moment;
• 23% of patients were fascinated by inviting bright light;
• 13% of people during clinical death watched, like a movie, episodes from life;
• another 8% saw the border of two worlds - the dead and the living, and some - their own dead relatives.

Among the respondents were people who were blind from birth. And the testimony is similar to the stories of the sighted. Skeptics explain visions by oxygen starvation of the brain and fantasy.

Is there life after death - Facts and evidence

- Is there an afterlife?

- Is there an afterlife?
— Facts and evidence
- Real stories of clinical death
— A scientific view of death

Life after death, or the afterlife, is a religious and philosophical idea of ​​the continuation of a person's conscious life after death. In most cases, such ideas are due to the belief in the immortality of the soul, which is characteristic of most religious and religious-philosophical worldviews.

Among the main presentations:

1) resurrection of the dead - people will be resurrected by God after death;
2) reincarnation - the human soul returns to the material world in new incarnations;
3) posthumous retribution - after death, the soul of a person goes to hell or heaven, depending on the earthly life of a person. (Also read about.)

Doctors in the intensive care unit of a Canadian hospital registered an unusual case. They turned off the life support system in four terminal patients. In three of them, the brain behaved in a normal way - it stopped working shortly after the shutdown. In the fourth patient, the brain emitted waves for another 10 minutes and 38 seconds, despite the fact that the doctors declared him dead, using the same set of measures as in the cases of his “colleagues”.

The brain of the fourth patient seemed to be in a deep sleep, although his body showed no signs of life - no pulse, no blood pressure, no reaction to light. Previously, brain waves were recorded in rats after decapitation, but in those situations there was only one wave.

- Is there life after death?! Facts and evidence

— A scientific view of death

In Seattle, biologist Mark Roth is experimenting with putting animals into suspended animation using chemicals that slow their heart rate and metabolism to levels similar to those seen during hibernation. His goal is to make people who have experienced a heart attack "a little bit immortal" until they overcome the consequences of the crisis that has put them on the brink of life and death.

In Baltimore and Pittsburgh, trauma teams led by surgeon Sam Tischerman are conducting clinical trials in which patients with gunshot and stab wounds are lowered their body temperature to slow bleeding for the period necessary to receive stitches. These doctors use the cold for the same purpose that Roth uses chemical compounds: it allows you to "kill" patients for a while in order to ultimately save their lives.

In Arizona, cryopreservation specialists store the bodies of more than 130 of their clients in a frozen state - this is also a kind of "border zone". They hope that sometime in the distant future, maybe in a few centuries, these people can be thawed and revived, and by that time medicine will be able to cure the diseases from which they died.

In India, neuroscientist Richard Davidson is studying Buddhist monks who fell into a state known as thukdam, in which biological signs of life disappear, but the body does not seem to decompose for a week or more. Davidson is trying to record some activity in the brains of these monks, hoping to find out what happens after the circulation stops.

And in New York, Sam Parnia talks enthusiastically about the possibilities of "delayed resuscitation." According to him, cardiopulmonary resuscitation works better than is commonly believed, and under certain conditions - when the body temperature is lowered, chest compressions are correctly regulated in depth and rhythm, and oxygen is supplied slowly to avoid tissue damage - some patients can be returned. to life even after they've been heartbroken for several hours, and often without long-term negative effects. The doctor is now investigating one of the most mysterious aspects of returning from the dead: why do so many near-death survivors describe their minds being separated from their bodies? What can these sensations tell us about the nature of the "border zone" and about death itself?

The material was prepared by Dilyara specifically for the site

Every person who is faced with the death of a loved one wonders if there is life after death? Now this issue is of particular relevance. If a few centuries ago the answer to this question was obvious to everyone, then now, after the period of atheism, its solution looks more complicated. We cannot easily believe hundreds of generations of our ancestors, who, through personal experience, century after century, were convinced that a person has an immortal soul. We want facts. Moreover, the facts are scientific.

They tried to convince us from the school bench that there is no God, there is no immortal soul. At the same time, we were told that this is what science says. And we believed... Let's note that we believed that there is no immortal soul, we believed that science supposedly proved it, we believed that there is no God. None of us even tried to figure out what an impartial science says about the soul. We easily trusted certain authorities, without particularly going into the details of their worldview, objectivity, and their interpretation of scientific facts.

We feel that the soul of the deceased is eternal, that it is alive, but on the other hand, the old and inspired stereotypes that there is no soul drag us into the abyss of despair. This struggle within us is very difficult and very exhausting. We want the truth!

So let's look at the question of the existence of the soul through a real, non-ideological, objective science. We will hear the opinion of real researchers on this issue, we will personally evaluate the logical calculations. Not our belief in the existence or non-existence of the soul, but only knowledge can extinguish this internal conflict, preserve our strength, give confidence, look at the tragedy from a different, real point of view.

First of all, let's talk about what consciousness is in general. People have thought about this issue throughout the history of mankind, but still cannot come to a final decision. We know only some properties, possibilities of consciousness. Consciousness is awareness of oneself, one's personality, it is a great analyzer of all our feelings, emotions, desires, plans. Consciousness is what distinguishes us, what obliges us to feel ourselves not as objects, but as individuals. In other words, Consciousness miraculously reveals our fundamental existence. Consciousness is our awareness of our “I”, but at the same time Consciousness is a great mystery. Consciousness has no dimensions, no form, no color, no smell, no taste; it cannot be touched or turned in one's hands. Despite the fact that we know very little about consciousness, we absolutely know for sure that we have it.

One of the main questions of humanity is the question of the nature of this very Consciousness (soul, "I", ego). Materialism and idealism have diametrically opposed views on this issue. In the view of materialism, human Consciousness is a substratum of the brain, a product of matter, a product of biochemical processes, a special fusion of nerve cells. In the view of idealism, Consciousness is the ego, “I”, spirit, soul – non-material, invisible spiritualizing the body, eternally existing, not dying energy. The subject always takes part in the acts of consciousness, which actually realizes everything.

If you are interested in purely religious ideas about the soul, then religion will not give any evidence of the existence of the soul. The doctrine of the soul is a dogma and is not subject to scientific proof.

There are absolutely no explanations, much less evidence, even for materialists who believe that they are impartial researchers (however, this is far from being the case).

But what about the majority of people who are equally far from religion, from philosophy, and from science too, imagine this Consciousness, soul, “I”? Let's ask ourselves, what is "I"?

The first thing that comes to mind for most is: “I am a man”, “I am a woman (man)”, “I am a businessman (turner, baker)”, “I am Tanya (Katya, Alexei)”, “I am a wife ( husband, daughter)" and the like. These are certainly funny answers. One's individual, unique "I" cannot be defined in general terms. There are a myriad of people in the world with the same characteristics, but they are not your “I”. Half of them are women (men), but they are also not “I”, people with the same professions seem to have their own, and not your “I”, the same can be said about wives (husbands), people of various professions, social status, nationalities, religions, and so on. No belonging to any group will explain to you what your individual “I” represents, because Consciousness is always personal. I am not qualities (qualities only belong to our “I”), because the qualities of one and the same person can change, but his “I” will remain unchanged.

Mental and physiological features too.

Some say that their "I" is their reflexes, their behavior, their individual ideas and addictions, their psychological characteristics and the like.

In fact, this cannot be the core of the personality, which is called "I". For what reason? Because throughout life, behavior and ideas and addictions change, and even more so psychological characteristics. It cannot be said that if earlier these features were different, then it was not my “I”. Realizing this, some make the following argument: "I am my individual body." It's already more interesting. Let's examine this assumption.

Everyone knows from the school anatomy course that the cells of our body are gradually renewed throughout life. Old ones die and new ones are born. Some cells are updated almost every day, but there are cells that go through their life cycle much longer. On average, every 15 years, all the cells of the body are renewed. If we consider the "I" ordinary as a set of human cells, then we get an absurdity. It turns out that if a person lives, for example, 70 years, during this time at least 4-5 times a person will change all the cells in his body (that is, 4-5 generations). Could this mean that not one person lived his 70-year life, but 5 different people? Isn't that pretty stupid? We conclude that "I" cannot be a body, because the body is not continuous, but "I" is continuous.

This means that "I" can be neither the qualities of cells, nor their totality.

Materialism is accustomed to decomposing the entire multidimensional world into mechanical components, “And to check harmony with algebra ...” (A.S. Pushkin). The most naive fallacy of militant materialism in relation to personality is the notion that personality is a collection of biological qualities. However, the combination of impersonal objects, even if they are atoms, even neurons, cannot give rise to a personality and its core - "I".

How is it possible for this most complex "I", feeling, capable of experiencing, love, to be the sum of specific cells of the body along with the ongoing biochemical and bioelectrical processes? How can these processes form the "I"???

Provided that if nerve cells made up our "I", then we would lose part of our "I" every day. With every dead cell, with every neuron, the "I" would get smaller and smaller. With the restoration, reproduction of cells, it would increase in size.

Scientific studies conducted in various countries of the world prove that nerve cells, like all other cells of the human body, are capable of regeneration. Here is what the most serious international biological journal Nature writes: “Employees of the California Institute for Biological Research. Salk found that perfectly functional young cells are born in the brain of adult mammals, which function on a par with already existing neurons. Professor Frederick Gage and his colleagues also concluded that brain tissue is most rapidly updated in physically active animals.

This is also confirmed by a publication in one of the most authoritative, refereed biological journals - Science: “Over the past two years, scientists have established that nerve and brain cells are updated, like the rest in the human body. The body is capable of repairing damage to the nerve tract itself,” says scientist Helen M. Blon.”

Thus, even with a complete change of all (including nerve) cells of the body, the “I” of a person remains the same, therefore, it does not belong to a continuously changing material body.

For some reason, it is now so difficult to prove what was obvious and understandable to the ancients. The Roman Neoplatonic philosopher Plotinus, who lived back in the 3rd century, wrote: “It is absurd to assume that since none of the parts has life, then life can be created by their totality, .. besides, it is absolutely impossible for life to produce a heap of parts, and that mind gave birth to that which is devoid of mind. If anyone will object that this is not so, but, in general, the soul is formed by atoms that have converged together, i.e. indivisible into parts of the body, it will be refuted by the fact that the atoms themselves only lie one next to the other, not forming a living whole, for unity and joint feeling cannot be obtained from bodies insensitive and incapable of unification; but the soul feels itself.”

"I" is the unchanging core of the personality, which includes many variables, but is not itself variable.

The skeptic may make a last desperate argument: "Is it possible that 'I' is the brain?"

The tale that our Consciousness is the activity of the brain was heard by many at school. It is an unusually widespread idea that the brain is essentially a person with his “I”. Most people think that it is the brain that receives information from the surrounding world, processes it and decides how to act in each specific case, they think that it is the brain that makes us alive, gives us personality. And the body is nothing more than a spacesuit that ensures the activity of the central nervous system.

But this story has nothing to do with science. The brain is now deeply studied. The chemical composition, sections of the brain, the connections of these sections with human functions have long been perfectly studied. The brain organization of perception, attention, memory, and speech has been studied. The functional blocks of the brain have been studied. A myriad of clinics and research centers have been studying the human brain for over a hundred years, for which costly, efficient equipment has been developed. But, having opened any textbooks, monographs, scientific journals on neurophysiology or neuropsychology, you will not find scientific data on the connection between the brain and Consciousness.

For people far from this field of knowledge, this seems surprising. Actually, there is nothing surprising in this. No one has ever discovered the connection between the brain and the very center of our personality, our "I". Of course, materialistic researchers have always wanted this. Thousands of studies and millions of experiments were carried out, many billions of dollars were spent on this. The efforts of the researchers were not in vain. Thanks to these studies, the parts of the brain themselves were discovered and studied, their connection with physiological processes was established, a lot was done to understand neurophysiological processes and phenomena, but the most important thing was not done. It was not possible to find in the brain the place that is our "I". It was not even possible, despite the extremely active work in this direction, to make a serious assumption about how the brain is generally connected with our Consciousness.

Where did the assumption that Consciousness resides in the brain come from? One of the first to put forward such an assumption in the middle of the 18th century was the famous electrophysiologist Dubois-Reymond (1818-1896). In his worldview, Dubois-Reymond was one of the brightest representatives of the mechanistic direction. In one of the letters to his friend, he wrote that “only physical and chemical laws operate in the body; if not everything can be explained with their help, then it is necessary, using physical and mathematical methods, either to find a way of their action, or to accept that there are new forces of matter, equal in value to physical and chemical forces.

But the eminent physiologist Carl Friedrich Wilhelm Ludwig, who lived at the same time as Reymond, did not agree with him. The founder of the scientific school, Ludwig, wrote that none of the existing theories of nervous activity, including the electrical theory of nerve currents by Dubois-Reymond, can say anything about how acts of sensation become possible due to the activity of nerves. Note that here we are not even talking about the most complex acts of consciousness, but about much simpler sensations. If there is no consciousness, then we cannot feel and feel anything.

Another prominent physiologist of the 19th century, the outstanding English neurophysiologist Sir Charles Scott Sherrington, Nobel Prize winner, said that if it is not clear how the psyche appears from the activity of the brain, then, naturally, it is just as little clear how it can have any effect on the behavior of a living being, which is controlled by the nervous system.

As a result, Dubois-Reymond himself came to this conclusion: “As we are aware, we do not know and perhaps we will never know. And no matter how deep we go into the jungle of intracerebral neurodynamics, we will not throw a bridge to the realm of consciousness.” Reymon came to a conclusion, disappointing for determinism, that it is impossible to explain Consciousness by material causes. He acknowledged that "here the human mind comes up against a 'world riddle' which it will never be able to comprehend."

Professor of Moscow University, philosopher A.I. Vvedensky in 1914 formulated the law of "the absence of objective signs of animation." The meaning of this law is that the role of the psyche in the system of material processes of regulation of behavior is completely elusive and there is no conceivable bridge between the activity of the brain and the area of ​​mental or spiritual phenomena, including Consciousness.

Leading experts in neurophysiology, Nobel Prize winners David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel recognized that in order to be able to assert the connection between the brain and Consciousness, one must understand what reads and decodes information that comes from the senses. The researchers acknowledged that this could not be done.

There is an interesting and convincing proof of the lack of connection between Consciousness and the work of the brain, understandable even to people who are far from science. Here it is:

Let's assume that "I" is the result of the work of the brain. As neurophysiologists probably know, a person can live even with one hemisphere of the brain. At the same time, he will have Consciousness. A person who lives only with the right hemisphere of the brain undoubtedly has an "I" (Consciousness). Accordingly, we can conclude that the "I" is not located in the left, absent, hemisphere. A person with a single functioning left hemisphere also has a "I", therefore "I" is not located in the right hemisphere, which this person does not have. Consciousness remains regardless of which hemisphere is removed. This means that a person does not have a brain area responsible for Consciousness, neither in the left nor in the right hemisphere of the brain. We have to conclude that the presence of consciousness in a person is not associated with certain areas of the brain.

Professor, MD Voyno-Yasenetsky describes: “In a young wounded man, I opened a huge abscess (about 50 cubic cm, pus), which, of course, destroyed the entire left frontal lobe, and I did not observe any mental defects after this operation. I can say the same about another patient operated on for a huge cyst of the meninges. With a wide opening of the skull, I was surprised to see that almost the entire right half of it was empty, and the entire left hemisphere of the brain was compressed, almost impossible to distinguish it.

In 1940, Dr. Augustine Iturricha made a sensational announcement at the Anthropological Society in Sucre, Bolivia. He and Dr. Ortiz studied the medical history of a 14-year-old boy, a patient from Dr. Ortiz's clinic, for a long time. The teenager was there with a diagnosis of brain tumor. The young man retained Consciousness until his death, complained only of a headache. When, after his death, a pathoanatomical autopsy was performed, the doctors were amazed: the entire brain mass was completely separated from the internal cavity of the cranium. A large abscess captured the cerebellum and part of the brain. It remained absolutely incomprehensible how the thinking of the sick boy was preserved.

The fact that consciousness exists independently of the brain is also confirmed by studies carried out relatively recently by Dutch physiologists under the direction of Pim van Lommel. The results of a large-scale experiment were published in the most authoritative English biological journal The Lancet. “Consciousness exists even after the brain has ceased to function. In other words, Consciousness “lives” by itself, completely independently. As for the brain, it is not a thinking matter at all, but an organ, like any other, that performs strictly defined functions. It is possible that thinking matter, even in principle, does not exist, said the head of the study, the famous scientist Pim van Lommel.

Professor V. F. Voyno-Yasenetsky gives another argument that is understandable to non-specialists: “In the wars of ants that do not have a brain, intentionality is clearly revealed, and therefore rationality, which is no different from human.” This is indeed an amazing fact. Ants solve rather difficult tasks of survival, building housing, providing food for themselves, that is, they have a certain intelligence, but they do not have a brain at all. It makes you think, doesn't it?

Neurophysiology does not stand still, but is one of the most dynamically developing sciences. The methods and scale of research speak for the success of brain research. Functions, parts of the brain are being studied, its composition is being clarified in more detail. Despite the titanic work on the study of the brain, world science in our time is also far from understanding what creativity, thinking, memory are and what is their connection with the brain itself. Having come to the understanding that there is no Consciousness inside the body, science draws natural conclusions about the non-material nature of consciousness.

Academician P.K. Anokhin: “None of the “mental” operations that we attribute to the “mind” have so far been directly linked to any part of the brain. If, in principle, we cannot understand how exactly the psychic appears as a result of the activity of the brain, then isn’t it more logical to think that the psyche is not essentially a function of the brain at all, but is a manifestation of some other, non-material spiritual forces?

At the end of the 20th century, the creator of quantum mechanics, Nobel Prize winner E. Schrödinger wrote that the nature of the connection of some physical processes with subjective events (which include Consciousness) lies "away from science and beyond human understanding."

The largest modern neurophysiologist, Nobel Prize winner in medicine J. Eccles developed the idea that it is impossible to determine the origin of mental phenomena based on the analysis of brain activity, and this fact is simply possibly interpreted in the sense that the psyche is not a function of the brain at all. According to Eccles, neither physiology nor the theory of evolution can shed light on the origin and nature of consciousness, which is completely alien to all material processes in the universe. The spiritual world of a person and the world of physical realities, including the activity of the brain, are absolutely independent independent worlds that only interact and to some extent influence each other. He is echoed by such venerable experts as Carl Lashley (an American scientist, director of the primate biology laboratory in Orange Park (Florida), who studied the mechanisms of the brain) and Edward Tolman, doctor of Harvard University.

With his colleague Wilder Penfield, the founder of modern neurosurgery, who performed over 10,000 brain surgeries, Eccles wrote the book The Mystery of Man. In it, the authors explicitly state that "there is no doubt that a person is controlled by SOMETHING outside his body." “I can confirm experimentally,” writes Eccles, “that the functioning of consciousness cannot be explained by the functioning of the brain. Consciousness exists independently of it.

According to Eccles' deep conviction, consciousness cannot be the subject of scientific research. In his opinion, the emergence of consciousness, as well as the emergence of life, is the highest religious mystery. In his report, the Nobel laureate relied on the conclusions of the book "Personality and the Brain", written together with the American philosopher and sociologist Karl Popper.

Wilder Penfield, as a result of many years of studying the activity of the brain, also came to the conclusion that "the energy of the mind has differences from the energy of brain neural impulses."

Academician of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the Russian Federation, Director of the Research Institute of the Brain (RAMS RF), world-famous neurophysiologist, professor, MD Natalya Petrovna Bekhtereva: “The hypothesis that the human brain only perceives thoughts from somewhere outside, I first heard from the mouth of the Nobel laureate, Professor John Eccles. Of course, at the time it seemed absurd to me. But then research conducted at our St. Petersburg Research Institute of the Brain confirmed that we cannot explain the mechanics of the creative process. The brain can generate only the simplest thoughts, such as how to turn the pages of a book you are reading or stir the sugar in a glass. And the creative process is a manifestation of the latest quality. As a believer, I admit the participation of the Almighty in the management of the thought process.

Science is gradually coming to the conclusion that the brain is not the source of thought and consciousness, but at most its relay.

Professor S. Grof says this about it: “Imagine that your TV has broken down and you called a TV technician who, by twisting various knobs, set it up. It doesn’t occur to you that all these stations are sitting in this box.”

Also in 1956, an outstanding scientist-surgeon, doctor of medical sciences, professor V. F. Voyno-Yasenetsky believed that our brain is not only not connected with Consciousness, but is not even capable of thinking, since the mental process is taken out of its limits . In his book, Valentin Feliksovich claims that “the brain is not an organ of thought, feelings”, and that “the Spirit goes beyond the brain, determining its activity, and our whole being, when the brain works as a transmitter, receiving signals and transmitting them to the organs of the body” .

The same conclusions were reached by English scientists Peter Fenwick from the London Institute of Psychiatry and Sam Parnia from Southampton Central Clinic. They examined patients who came back to life after cardiac arrest, and found that some of them certainly recounted the contents of the conversations that the medical staff had while they were in a state of clinical death. Others gave an accurate description of the events that occurred in a given time period. Sam Parnia argues that the brain, like any other organ of the human body, is made up of cells and is incapable of thinking. However, it can work as a device that detects thoughts, that is, as an antenna, with the help of which it becomes possible to receive a signal from the outside. The researchers suggested that during clinical death, the Consciousness, acting independently of the brain, uses it as a screen. Like a television receiver, which first receives the waves falling into it, and then converts them into sound and image.

If we turn off the radio, this does not mean that the radio station stops broadcasting. Those. after the death of the physical body, Consciousness continues to live.

The fact of the continuation of the life of Consciousness after the death of the body is also confirmed by Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Director of the Research Institute of the Human Brain, Professor N.P. Bekhterev in his book “The Magic of the Brain and the Labyrinths of Life”. In addition to the discussion of purely scientific issues, in this book the author also cites his personal experience of encountering posthumous phenomena.

Natalya Bekhtereva, talking about a meeting with the Bulgarian clairvoyant Vanga Dimitrova, speaks very precisely about this in one of her interviews: “The example of Vanga absolutely convinced me that there is a phenomenon of contact with the dead,” and also a quote from her book: “ I can't believe what I've heard and seen myself. A scientist does not have the right to reject facts just because they do not fit into a dogma, worldview.

The first consistent description of afterlife based on scientific observations was given by the Swedish scientist and naturalist Emmanuel Swedenborg. After that, this problem was seriously studied by the famous psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler Ross, the no less famous psychiatrist Raymond Moody, conscientious researchers, academicians Oliver Lodge, William Crookes, Alfred Wallace, Alexander Butlerov, Professor Friedrich Myers, American pediatrician Melvin Morse. Among the serious and systematic scholars of the issue of dying, one should mention the professor of medicine at Emory University and the staff physician at the Veterans Hospital in Atlanta, Dr. Michael Sabom, the systematic study of psychiatrist Kenneth Ring is also very valuable, the study of this problem was carried out by the doctor of medicine, resuscitator Moritz Roolings , our contemporary, thanatopsychologist A. A. Nalchadzhyan. A well-known Soviet scientist, a prominent specialist in the field of thermodynamic processes, academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Belarus Albert Veinik worked a lot on understanding this problem from the point of view of physics. A significant contribution to the study of near-death experiences was made by the world-famous American psychologist of Czech origin, the founder of the transpersonal school of psychology, Dr. Stanislav Grof.

The variety of facts accumulated by science indisputably proves that after physical death, each of the living now inherits a different reality, preserving their Consciousness.

Despite the limitations of our ability to cognize this reality with the help of material means, today there are a number of its characteristics obtained through experiments and observations of researchers investigating this problem.

These characteristics were listed by A. V. Mikheev, a researcher at the St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University in his report at the international symposium "Life after death: from faith to knowledge" which was held on April 8-9, 2005 in St. Petersburg:

1. There is a so-called “subtle body”, which is the carrier of self-consciousness, memory, emotions and the “inner life” of a person. This body exists ... after physical death, being for the duration of the existence of the physical body its "parallel component", providing the above processes. The physical body is only an intermediary for their manifestation on the physical (terrestrial) level.

2. The life of an individual does not end with the current earthly death. Survival after death is a natural law for a person.

3. The next reality is divided into a large number of levels, differing in the frequency characteristics of their components.

4. The destination of a person during the posthumous transition is determined by his tuning to a certain level, which is the total result of his thoughts, feelings and actions during his life on Earth. Just as the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a chemical substance depends on its composition, a person's posthumous destination is definitely determined by the "composite characteristic" of his inner life.

5. The concepts of "Heaven and Hell" reflect two polarities, possible posthumous states.

6. In addition to similar polar states, there are a number of intermediate ones. The selection of an adequate state is automatically determined by the mental-emotional "pattern" formed by a person during earthly life. That is why bad emotions, violence, the desire for destruction and fanaticism, no matter how they are justified outwardly, in this respect are extremely destructive for the future fate of a person. This is a solid rationale for personal responsibility and adherence to ethical principles.

All of the above arguments are surprisingly accurate with the religious knowledge of all traditional religions. This is an occasion to cast aside doubts and decide. Is not it?

admin.- A depressing situation. Consciousness exists, but it is impossible to explain it. Nevertheless, the theory of understanding the essence and mechanisms of the origin and functioning of Consciousness already exists and it was discovered by the Russian scientist Nikolai Levashov in his work "Essence and Mind", which you can read by reading or downloading on our website. This work is truly unique, due to the fact that it shows the harmonious regularity and interconnection of the Universe and Consciousness, the emergence of matter, living and non-living, and further development of living matter until the emergence of Consciousness. Just read and much will become clearer.

1. For 3 days after the death of a person, the enzymes remaining in the body contribute to decomposition.

2. The body of Abraham Lincoln was reburied after death 17 times.

3. People who hang themselves most often have a post-mortem erection.

4. The head of a person after death continues to live for about 20 seconds.

5. In 1907, Dr. Duncan McDougalo conducted an experiment in which a person had to be weighed "before" and "after" his death. After death, a person loses weight.

6. The real facts of life after death say that people with large fat deposits turn into soap after death.

7. Moritz Roolings wrote the book "Beyond the threshold of death."

8. If you believe the scientists, then a person who was buried alive will die after 5.5 hours.

9. After death, a person's nails and hair do not grow.

10. Many people have visited another world when they were in a state of clinical death.

11. Children see only the good in clinical death.

12. Adults who have experienced clinical death have seen monsters and demons.

13. In Madagascar, after the death of a person, relatives dig up the remains of the deceased. This is necessary in order to dance along with the deceased during the ritual ceremony, which is called Famadihana.

14. American scientist Michael Newton used hypnosis to awaken people's memories of a past life.

15. When dying, a person is reborn in another body.

16. When a person dies, the hearing goes last.

17. In the southeastern part of Asia, there are still mummies in which nails and hair continue to grow.

18. Reliable facts of life after death suggest that the psychologist Raymond Moody managed to write the book "Life after death."

19. Many nations have a ban on pronouncing the name of the deceased after his death.

20. Information in the human brain after death does not die, but is stored. This fact confirms life after death: what facts are known exactly remains a great mystery.

21. Residents of China believe that after death they fall into the underworld.

22. After the death of a person, his body undergoes various changes and in all parts.

23. Coconuts kill more people than sharks.

24. In France, if desired, they officially marry the dead. This is permitted by law.

25. Many animals can pretend to be dead to escape from a predator.

26.9 women out of 10 are able to remember their past lives within an hour.

27. In a Norwegian town called Longyearbyen, it is forbidden by law to die. If a person dies in this city, they will not bury him there.

28. Blind people are able to "see" what will happen to them after death.

29. On the territory of Ancient Rome, lemurs were called the dead, who died and did not return to the world of the living.

30. Residents of South Korea believe in the myth that a person dies while in a dark room with a fan.

31. About 15 years are allotted for the decomposition of a dead human body.

32. After death, a person remains the same as he was before: the qualities, and the mind and abilities do not change.

33. After the death of a person, the cerebral cortex continues to receive blood from vessels that continue to work until the onset of biological death.

34. During earthly life, a person creates for himself a bed on which he will have to sleep after death.

35. After death, adults see themselves as children, and children, on the contrary, as adults.

36. If a person during his lifetime had any injuries or injuries, then after death they disappear.

37. After death, a person's consciousness takes on completely different forms, while retaining its essence.

38. Professor Voyno-Yasenetsky believes that another world is hidden inside the world we see - the afterlife.

39. There is no longer a person in a dead person. This is what life after death is about. The facts about this philosophical topic can be read without ceasing.

40. Archpriest Pavel believes that earthly life is a preparation for life after death. The human body is destroyed, but the soul continues to live.

41. Life in the body of a person continues after his death, but consciousness has nothing to do with this.

42. After death, gas pressure rises in the body.

43. Vanga claimed that the afterlife exists. The dead, according to her assumptions, begin a new life after death, and their souls are among us.

44.N.P. Bekhtereva said that after the death of her husband, his ghost appeared not only at night, but also during the day.

45. The facts of life after death state that only good souls return to Earth after death.

46. ​​The Egyptians believed that the afterlife is almost identical to the real one.

47. Things were put into the tomb of the dead pharaoh so that they would be useful in the afterlife.

48. Sometimes dead people come to life.

49. After death, the state of a person does not become inactive and boring peace, but appears in the form of a harmonious and complete satisfaction of all needs. This once again proves life after death, the facts about which are interesting to everyone.

50. Suicides, laying hands on themselves, believe that "they will end everything," but in the afterlife everything is just beginning for them.

Thanks to the progress of medicine, the resuscitation of the dead has become almost a standard procedure in many modern hospitals. Previously, it was almost never used.

In this article, we will not cite real cases from the practice of resuscitators and the stories of those who themselves suffered clinical death, since a lot of such descriptions can be found in books such as:

• "Closer to the Light"
• Life after life
• "Memories of Death"
• "Life at death" (
• "Beyond the threshold of death" (

The purpose of this material is to classify what people saw in the afterlife and present what they told in an understandable form as evidence of the existence of life after death.

What happens after a person dies

“He is dying” is often the first thing a person hears at the moment of clinical death. What happens after a person's death? At first the patient feels that he is leaving the body and a second later he looks down at himself hovering under the ceiling.

At this moment, for the first time, a person sees himself from the outside and experiences a huge shock. In a panic, he tries to attract attention to himself, scream, touch the doctor, move objects, but as a rule, all his attempts are in vain. Nobody sees or hears him.

After some time, the person realizes that all his senses remained functional, despite the fact that his physical body is dead. Moreover, the patient experiences an indescribable lightness that he had never experienced before. This feeling is so wonderful that the dying person does not want to return back to the body.

Some, after the above, return to the body, and this is where their excursion into the afterlife ends, someone, on the contrary, manages to get into a kind of tunnel, at the end of which light is visible. After passing a kind of gate, they see a world of great beauty.

Someone is met by relatives and friends, some meet with a bright being, from whom great love and understanding emanates. Someone is sure that this is Jesus Christ, someone claims that this is a guardian angel. But everyone agrees that he is full of goodness and compassion.

Of course, not everyone manages to admire the beauty and enjoy the bliss. afterlife. Some people say that they fell into gloomy places and, returning, describe the disgusting and cruel creatures they saw.

ordeal

Those who returned from the "other world" often say that at some point they saw their whole life in full view. Each of their actions seemed to be a randomly thrown phrase and even thoughts flashed before them as if in reality. At this moment, a person was reconsidering his whole life.

At that moment there were no such concepts as social status, hypocrisy, pride. All the masks of the mortal world were thrown off and the man appeared before the court as if naked. He couldn't hide anything. Each of his bad deeds was displayed in great detail and it was shown how he affected those around him and those who were hurt and suffering by such behavior.

At this time, all the advantages achieved in life - social and economic status, diplomas, titles, etc. - lose their meaning. The only thing that is subject to evaluation is the moral side of actions. At this moment, a person realizes that nothing is erased and does not pass without a trace, but everything, even every thought, has consequences.

For evil and cruel people, this will truly be the beginning of unbearable internal torment, the so-called, from which it is impossible to escape. The consciousness of the evil done, the crippled soul of one's own and that of others, becomes for such people like an "unquenchable fire" from which there is no way out. It is this kind of judgment over deeds that is referred to in the Christian religion as ordeals.

Afterworld

Having crossed the line, a person, despite the fact that all the senses remain the same, begins to feel everything around him in a completely new way. His sensations seem to start to work one hundred percent. The gamut of feelings and experiences is so great that the returnees simply cannot explain in words all that they had a chance to feel there.

From the more earthly and familiar to us in terms of perception, this is time and distance, which, according to those who have been in the afterlife, flows there in a completely different way.

People who have experienced clinical death often find it difficult to answer how long their post-mortem state lasted. A few minutes, or several thousand years, it made no difference to them.

As for the distance, it didn't exist at all. A person could be transported to any point, to any distance, just by thinking about it, that is, by the power of thought!

The surprising point is that not all of the resuscitated describe places similar to heaven and hell. Descriptions of the places of individual individuals simply stagger the imagination. They are sure that they were on other planets or in other dimensions, and this seems to be true.

Judge for yourself word forms like hilly meadows; bright green of a color that does not exist on earth; fields bathed in wonderful golden light; cities indescribable in words; animals that you will not find anywhere else - all this does not apply to descriptions of hell and paradise. People who visited there did not find the right words to intelligibly convey their impressions.

What does the soul look like

In what form do the dead appear before others, and how do they look in their own eyes? This question is of interest to many, and fortunately those who have been abroad have given us the answer.

Those who have been aware of their out-of-body experience report that it was difficult for them to recognize themselves at first. First of all, the imprint of age disappears: children see themselves as adults, and old people see themselves as young.

The body also changes. If a person had any injuries or injuries during his lifetime, then after death they disappear. Amputated limbs appear, hearing and sight return, if it was previously absent from the physical body.

Meetings after death

Those who have been on the other side of the "veil" often say that they met there with their deceased relatives, friends and acquaintances. Most often, people see those with whom they were close during life or were related.

Such visions cannot be considered a rule; rather, they are exceptions that do not occur very often. Usually such meetings act as an edification to those who are still too early to die, and who must return to earth and change their lives.

Sometimes people see what they expected to see. Christians see angels, the Virgin Mary, Jesus Christ, saints. Non-religious people see some kind of temples, figures in white or young men, and sometimes they see nothing, but feel "presence".

Soul communion

Many resuscitated people claim that something or someone communicated with them there. When they are asked to tell what the conversation was about, they find it difficult to answer. This happens due to the language they do not know, or rather slurred speech.

For a long time, doctors could not explain why people do not remember or cannot convey what they heard and considered it to be just hallucinations, but over time, some returnees were still able to explain the mechanism of communication.

It turned out that there people communicate mentally! Therefore, if in that world all thoughts are "heard", then we need to learn here to control our thoughts, so that there we will not be ashamed of what we involuntarily thought.

Cross the line

Almost everyone who has experienced afterlife and remembers her, talks about a certain barrier that separates the world of the living and the dead. Having crossed over to the other side, a person will never be able to return to life, and every soul knows this, even though no one told her about it.

This limit is different for everyone. Some see a fence or a fence at the edge of a field, others see a lake or sea shore, and still others see it as a gate, a stream or a cloud. The difference in descriptions follows, again, from the subjective perception of each.

After reading all of the above, only an inveterate skeptic and materialist can say that afterlife this is fiction. Many doctors and scientists for a long time denied not only the existence of hell and paradise, but also completely ruled out the possibility of the existence of an afterlife.

The testimonies of eyewitnesses who experienced this state on themselves drove into a dead end all scientific theories that denied life after death. Of course, today there are a number of scientists who still consider all the testimony of the reanimated to be hallucinations, but no evidence will help such a person until he himself begins the journey to eternity.