What do Catholic and Orthodox churches have in common? Principal and ritual differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism

How is Catholicism different from Orthodoxy? When did the division of the Churches occur and why did it happen? How should the Orthodox approach all this? Let's talk about the most important thing.

The separation of Orthodoxy and Catholicism is a great tragedy in the history of the Church

The division of the One Christian Church into Orthodoxy and Catholicism happened almost a thousand years ago - in 1054.

The One Church consisted, as the Orthodox Church does now, of many local Churches. This means that the Churches - for example, Russian Orthodox or Greek Orthodox - have some external differences (in the architecture of temples; singing; the language of services; and even in the way certain parts of services are conducted), but they are united in the main doctrinal questions, and between them there is Eucharistic communion. That is, a Russian Orthodox can take communion and confess in a Greek Orthodox church and vice versa.

According to the Creed, the Church is one, because at the head of the Church is Christ. This means that there cannot be several Churches on earth that would have different dogma. And it was precisely because of disagreements in doctrinal matters that in the 11th century there was a division into Catholicism and Orthodoxy. As a consequence of this, Catholics cannot take communion and confess in Orthodox churches and vice versa.

Catholic Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Moscow. Photo: catedra.ru

What are the differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism?

Today there are a lot of them. And conditionally they are divided into three types.

1. Doctrine differences- because of which, in fact, there was a split. For example, the dogma of the infallibility of the Pope among Catholics.
2. Ritual differences. For example, a form of Communion that is different from us among Catholics or a vow of celibacy (celibacy), which is obligatory for Catholic priests. That is, we have fundamentally different approaches to certain aspects of the Sacraments and Church life, and they can complicate the hypothetical reunification of Catholics and Orthodox. But they did not become the reason for the split, and they did not prevent us from reuniting again.
3. Conditional differences in traditions. For example - org a us in temples; benches in the middle of the church; priests with or without beards; various forms of vestments for priests. In other words, external features that do not affect the unity of the Church at all - since some similar differences are found even within the Orthodox Church in different countries. In general, if the difference between Orthodox and Catholics consisted only in them, the One Church would never be divided.

The division into Orthodoxy and Catholicism that occurred in the 11th century was, first of all, a tragedy for the Church, which was and is being acutely experienced by both “us” and the Catholics. Reunification attempts have been made several times over the course of a thousand years. However, none of them turned out to be truly viable - and we will also talk about this below.

What is the difference between Catholicism and Orthodoxy - because of what the Church was actually divided?

Western and Eastern Christian Churches - such a division has always existed. The Western Church is conditionally the territory of modern Western Europe, and later - all the colonized countries of Latin America. The Eastern Church is the territory of modern Greece, Palestine, Syria, and Eastern Europe.

However, the division we are talking about has been conditional for many centuries. Too different peoples and civilizations inhabit the Earth, so it is natural that the same teaching in different parts of the Earth and countries could have some characteristic external forms and traditions. For example, the Eastern Church (the one that became Orthodox) has always practiced a more contemplative and mystical way of life. It was in the East in the III century that such a phenomenon as monasticism arose, which then spread to the whole world. The Latin (Western) Church - has always had the image of Christianity outwardly more active and "social".

In the main doctrinal truths, they remained common.

Saint Anthony the Great, founder of monasticism

Perhaps the differences, which later became insurmountable, could have been noticed much earlier and “agreed”. But in those days there was no Internet, there were no trains and cars. Churches (not only Western and Eastern, but simply - separate dioceses) sometimes existed for decades on their own and rooted in themselves certain views. Therefore, the differences that caused the division of the Church into Catholicism and Orthodoxy, at the time of the “decision” turned out to be too ingrained.

This is what the Orthodox cannot accept in Catholic teaching.

• the infallibility of the Pope and the doctrine of the primacy of the See of Rome
• changing the text of the Creed
• doctrine of purgatory

Pope Infallibility in Catholicism

Each church has its own primate - the head. In the Orthodox Churches, this is the patriarch. The primate of the Western Church (or the Latin Chair, as it is also called) was the pope, who is now the head of the Catholic Church.

The Catholic Church believes that the pope is infallible. This means that any judgment, decision or opinion that he voices before the flock is the truth and law for the entire Church.

The current Pope is Francis

According to Orthodox teaching, no person can be higher than the Church. For example, an Orthodox patriarch, if his decisions go against the teachings of the Church or deep-rooted traditions, may well be deprived of his rank by a decision of a bishops' council (as happened, for example, with Patriarch Nikon in the 17th century).

In addition to the infallibility of the pope in Catholicism, there is a doctrine of the primacy of the See of Rome (the Church). Catholics base this teaching on an incorrect interpretation of the words of the Lord in a conversation with the apostles in Caesarea Philipova - about the alleged superiority of the Apostle Peter (who later "founded" the Latin Church) over the other apostles.

(Matthew 16:15-19) “He says to them: And who do you say that I am? Simon Peter, answering, said: You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God. Then Jesus answered and said to him: Blessed are you, Simon, son of Jonas, because it was not flesh and blood that revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven; and I say to you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it; And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”.

You can read more about the dogma of papal infallibility and the primacy of the Roman throne.

The difference between Orthodox and Catholics: the text of the Creed

The different text of the Creed is another reason for disagreement between Orthodox and Catholics - although the difference is only in one word.

The Creed is a prayer that was formulated in the 4th century at the first and second Ecumenical Councils, and it put an end to many doctrinal disputes. It articulates everything that Christians believe.

What is the difference between Catholic and Orthodox texts? We say that we believe "And in the Holy Spirit, who proceeds from the Father", and Catholics add: "... from the "Father and the Son proceeding ...".

In fact, the addition of just this one word "And the Son ..." (Filioque) significantly distorts the image of the entire Christian teaching.

The topic is theological, difficult, it is immediately better to read about it at least on Wikipedia.

The doctrine of purgatory is another difference between Catholics and Orthodox

Catholics believe in the existence of purgatory, and the Orthodox say that nowhere - in any of the books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old or New Testaments, and even in none of the books of the Holy Fathers of the first centuries - is there any mention of purgatory.

It is difficult to say how this doctrine arose among the Catholics. Nevertheless, now the Catholic Church fundamentally proceeds from the fact that after death there is not only the Kingdom of Heaven and hell, but also a place (or rather, a state) in which the soul of a person who died in peace with God finds himself, but not holy enough to be in Paradise. These souls, apparently, will certainly come to the Kingdom of Heaven, but first they need to undergo purification.

Orthodox see the afterlife differently than Catholics. There is Heaven, there is Hell. There are ordeals after death in order to be strengthened in peace with God (or fall away from Him). There is a need to pray for the dead. But there is no purgatory.

These are the three reasons why the difference between Catholics and Orthodox is so fundamental that a division of the Churches arose a thousand years ago.

At the same time, over 1000 years of separate existence, a number of other differences arose (or took root), which are also considered to be what distinguishes us from each other. Something about external rites - and it may seem a fairly serious difference - and something about the external traditions that Christianity acquired here and there.

Orthodoxy and Catholicism: Differences That Don't Really Divide Us

Catholics don't take communion the way we do - is that true?

Orthodox partake of the Body and Blood of Christ from the chalice. Until recently, Catholics took communion not with leavened bread, but with unleavened bread - that is, unleavened bread. Moreover, ordinary parishioners, unlike the clergy, communed only with the Body of Christ.

Before saying why it happened so, it should be noted that this form of Catholic Communion has recently ceased to be the only one. Now other forms of this Sacrament appear in Catholic churches, including the “familiar” one for us: the Body and Blood from the chalice.

And the tradition of Communion, which is different from us, arose in Catholicism for two reasons:

1. Regarding the use of unleavened bread: Catholics proceed from the fact that at the time of Christ, Jews at Easter broke not leavened, but unleavened bread. (The Orthodox come from the Greek texts of the New Testament, where when describing the Last Supper that the Lord performed with the disciples, the word “artos” is used, which means leavened bread)
2. Regarding communion of parishioners only with the Body: Catholics proceed from the fact that Christ abides in equal and full measure in any of the parts of the Holy Gifts, and not only when they are combined together. (The Orthodox are guided by the text of the New Testament, where Christ directly speaks of His Body and Blood. Mt 26:26–28: “ And while they were eating, Jesus took bread, and having blessed it, broke it, and giving it to the disciples, said, Take, eat: this is my body. And he took the cup and gave thanks, and gave it to them, and said, Drink all of you from it, for this is My Blood of the New Testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.»).

They sit in Catholic churches

Generally speaking, this is not even a difference between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, since in some Orthodox countries - for example, in Bulgaria - it is also customary to sit, and in many churches you can also see many benches and chairs there.

There are many benches, but this is not a Catholic, but an Orthodox church - in New York.

Catholic churches have a n

The organ is part of the musical accompaniment of the service. Music is one of the integral parts of the service, because if it were otherwise, there would be no choir, and the entire service would be read. Another thing is that we, the Orthodox, are now accustomed to singing alone.

In many Latin countries, an organ was also installed in temples, since they considered it a divine instrument - they found its sound so sublime and unearthly.

(At the same time, the possibility of using the organ in Orthodox worship was also discussed in Russia at the Local Council of 1917-1918. The well-known church composer Alexander Grechaninov was a supporter of this instrument.)

Vow of celibacy among Catholic priests (celibate)

In Orthodoxy, both a monk and a married priest can be a priest. We are quite detailed.

In Catholicism, any clergyman is bound by a vow of celibacy.

Catholic priests shave their beards

This is another example of different traditions, and not some fundamental differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism. Whether a person has a beard or not does not in any way affect his holiness and does not say anything about him as a good or bad Christian. It’s just that in Western countries it has been customary to shave a beard for some time (most likely, this is the influence of the Latin culture of Ancient Rome).

Now no one forbids shaving beards and Orthodox priests. It’s just that a priest or monk’s beard is a tradition so deeply rooted in us that breaking it can become a “temptation” for others, and therefore few priests decide on it or even think about it.

Metropolitan Anthony of Surozh is one of the most famous Orthodox pastors of the 20th century. For a time he served without a beard.

The duration of worship and the severity of fasting

It so happened that over the past 100 years, the Church life of Catholics has been significantly "simplified" - if I may say so. The duration of divine services has been reduced, the fasts have become simpler and shorter (for example, before taking communion, it is enough not to eat food for only a few hours). Thus, the Catholic Church tried to reduce the gap between itself and the secular part of society - fearing that the excessive severity of the rules could scare away modern people. Whether it helped or not is hard to say.

The Orthodox Church, in her views on the severity of fasting and external rites, proceeds from the following:

Of course, the world has changed a lot and it will be impossible for most people to live in all severity now. However, the memory of the Rules and a strict ascetic life is still important. "By mortifying the flesh, we free the spirit." And you can’t forget about it - at least as an ideal, which you need to strive for in the depths of your soul. And if this "measure" disappears, then how to maintain the desired "bar"?

This is only a small part of the external traditional differences that have developed between Orthodoxy and Catholicism.

However, it is important to know what unites our Churches:

• the presence of Church Sacraments (communion, confession, baptism, etc.)
• veneration of the Holy Trinity
• veneration of the Mother of God
• veneration of icons
• veneration of saints and their relics
• common saints for the first ten centuries of the Church's existence
• Holy Bible

In February 2016, the first ever meeting between the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Pope of Rome (Francis) took place in Cuba. An event of historical scale, but there was no talk of the unification of the Churches at it.

Orthodoxy and Catholicism - attempts to unite (Unia)

The separation of Orthodoxy and Catholicism is a great tragedy in the history of the Church, which is acutely experienced by both Orthodox and Catholics.

Several times in 1000 years attempts have been made to bridge the schism. The so-called Unias were concluded three times - between the Catholic Church and representatives of the Orthodox Church. All of them had the following in common:

• They were concluded primarily for political, and not for religious calculations.
• Each time, these were “concessions” on the part of the Orthodox. As a rule, in the following form: the external form and language of worship remained familiar to the Orthodox, however, in all dogmatic disagreements, the Catholic interpretation was taken.
• Being signed by some bishops, as a rule, they were rejected by the rest of the Orthodox Church - the clergy and the people, and therefore turned out to be, in fact, unviable. The exception is the last Union of Brest.

Here are the three Unions:

Union of Lyons (1274)

She was supported by the emperor of Orthodox Byzantium, since the unification with the Catholics was supposed to help restore the shaken financial position of the empire. The union was signed, but the people of Byzantium and the rest of the Orthodox clergy did not support it.

Ferrara-Florence Union (1439)

Both sides were equally politically interested in this Union, since the Christian states were weakened by wars and enemies (Latin states - by the Crusades, Byzantium - by confrontation with the Turks, Russia - with the Tatar-Mongols) and the unification of states on religious grounds would probably help , everyone.

The situation repeated itself: the Union was signed (although not by all representatives of the Orthodox Church who were present at the council), but it remained, in fact, on paper - the people did not support the union on such conditions.

Suffice it to say that the first "Uniate" service was performed in the capital of Byzantium in Constantinople only in 1452. And less than a year later, the Turks captured it ...

Union of Brest (1596)

This Union was concluded between the Catholics and the Orthodox Church of the Commonwealth (the state that then united the Lithuanian and Polish principalities).

The only example when the union of Churches turned out to be viable - albeit within the framework of just one state. The rules are the same: all divine services, rituals and language remain familiar to the Orthodox, however, not the patriarch, but the pope is commemorated at the services; the text of the Creed is changed and the doctrine of purgatory is adopted.

After the division of the Commonwealth, part of its territories ceded to Russia - and with it a number of Uniate parishes also departed. Despite the persecution, they continued to exist until the middle of the 20th century, until they were officially banned by the Soviet authorities.

Today, there are Uniate parishes on the territory of Western Ukraine, the Baltic states and Belarus.

Separation of Orthodoxy and Catholicism: how to relate to this?

We would like to quote briefly from the letters of the Orthodox Bishop Hilarion (Troitsky), who died in the first half of the 20th century. Being a zealous defender of Orthodox dogmas, he nevertheless writes:

“Unfortunate historical circumstances tore the West away from the Church. Over the centuries, the church perception of Christianity was gradually distorted in the West. Teaching has changed, life has changed, the very understanding of life has departed from the Church. We [Orthodox] have preserved church wealth. But instead of lending to others from this unexpected wealth, we ourselves in some areas have come under the influence of the West with its theology alien to the Church.” (Letter 5. Orthodoxy in the West)

And here is what St. Theophan the Recluse answered to one woman a century earlier when she asked: “Father, explain to me: none of the Catholics will be saved?”

The saint replied: “I don’t know if the Catholics will be saved, but I know one thing for sure: that I myself will not be saved without Orthodoxy.”

This answer and the quotation of Hilarion (Troitsky) may very accurately indicate the correct attitude of an Orthodox person towards such a misfortune as the division of the Churches.

Read this and other posts in our group in

The Christian faith from time immemorial has been attacked by opponents. In addition, attempts to interpret the Holy Scriptures in their own way were made at different times by different people. Perhaps this was the reason why the Christian faith was divided over time into Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox. They are all very similar, but there are differences between them. Who are Protestants and how does their teaching differ from Catholic and Orthodox? Let's try to figure it out. Let's start with the origins - with the formation of the first Church.

How did the Orthodox and Catholic Churches appear?

Approximately in the 50s from the Nativity of Christ, the disciples of Jesus and their supporters created the Orthodox Christian Church, which still exists today. First there were five ancient Christian Churches. In the first eight centuries since the birth of Christ, the Orthodox Church, led by the Holy Spirit, built her teaching, developed her own methods and traditions. To this end, all the Five Churches took part in the Ecumenical Councils. This teaching has not changed today. The Orthodox Church includes Churches that are not connected with each other by anything other than faith - the Syrian, Russian, Greek, Jerusalem, etc. But there is no other organization or no person that unites all these Churches under its leadership. The only leader in the Orthodox Church is Jesus Christ. Why is the Orthodox Church called the Catholic Church in prayer? It's simple: if you need to make an important decision, all the Churches take part in the Ecumenical Council. Later, a thousand years later, in 1054, the Roman Church, which is also Catholic, separated from the five ancient Christian churches.

This Church did not seek advice from other members of the Ecumenical Council, but made decisions and carried out reforms in church life itself. We will talk in more detail about the teachings of the Roman Church a little later.

How did the Protestants appear?

Let's return to the main question: "Who are the Protestants?" After the separation of the Roman Church, many people did not like the changes introduced by it. It was not in vain that the people thought that all the reforms were aimed only at making the Church richer and more influential.

After all, even in order to atone for sins, a person had to pay a certain amount of money to the Church. And in 1517, in Germany, the monk Martin Luther gave impetus to the Protestant faith. He denounced the Roman Catholic Church and its ministers that they are looking only for their own benefit, forgetting about God. Luther said that the Bible should be preferred if there is a conflict between church tradition and Scripture. Luther also translated the Bible from Latin into German, proclaiming that each person can study the Holy Scriptures for himself and interpret it in his own way. So are Protestants? Protestants demanded a revision of attitudes towards religion, getting rid of unnecessary traditions and rituals. The enmity began between the two Christian denominations. Catholics and Protestants fought. The only difference is that Catholics fought for power and subjugation to themselves, while Protestants fought for freedom of choice and the right path in religion.

Persecution of Protestants

Of course, the Roman Church could not ignore the attacks of those who opposed unquestioning obedience. Catholics did not want to accept and understand who the Protestants were. There were massacres of Catholics against Protestants, public executions of those who refused to become Catholics, harassment, ridicule, persecution. Adherents of Protestantism also did not always prove their case in a peaceful way. Protests by opponents of the Catholic Church and its rule in many countries swept with mass pogroms of Catholic churches. For example, in the 16th century in the Netherlands there were more than 5,000 pogroms by people who rebelled against Catholics. In response to the riots, the authorities repaired their own court, they did not understand how Catholics differ from Protestants. In the same Netherlands, over 80 years of war between the authorities and the Protestants, 2,000 conspirators were convicted and executed. In total, about 100,000 Protestants suffered for their faith in this country. And that's just in one country. Protestants, in spite of everything, defended their right to a different point of view on the issue of Church life. But, the uncertainty that was present in their teaching led to the fact that other groups began to separate from the Protestants. There are more than twenty thousand different Protestant churches all over the world, for example, Lutheran, Anglican, Baptist, Pentecostal, and among the Protestant movements there are Methodists, Presbyterians, Adventists, Congregationalists, Quakers, etc. Catholics and Protestants have greatly changed the Church. Who are Catholics and Protestants according to their teachings, let's try to figure it out. In fact, Catholics, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians are both Christians. The difference between them is that the Orthodox Church has what can be called the fullness of the teachings of Christ - it is a school and an example of goodness, it is a clinic for human souls, and Protestants simplify all this more and more, creating something in which it is very difficult to know the doctrine of virtue, and what cannot be called a complete doctrine of salvation.

Basic principles of Protestants

You can answer the question of who the Protestants are by understanding the basic principles of their teaching. Protestants consider all rich ecclesiastical experience, all spiritual art collected over the centuries, invalid. They recognize only the Bible, believing that it is the only true source of how and what to do in church life. For Protestants, the Christian communities of the time of Jesus and his apostles are the ideal of what the life of a Christian should be like. But adherents of Protestantism do not take into account the fact that at that time the church structure simply did not exist. The Protestants simplified everything of the Church, except for the Bible, mainly because of the reforms of the Roman Church. Because Catholicism has greatly changed the doctrine and deviated from the Christian spirit. And the splits among the Protestants began to occur because they threw away everything - up to the teachings of the great saints, spiritual teachers, leaders of the Church. And since the Protestants began to deny these teachings, or rather, did not perceive them, then they began to argue in the interpretation of the Bible. Hence the split in Protestantism and the waste of energy not on self-education, as with the Orthodox, but on a useless struggle. The difference between Catholics and Protestants is being erased against the background of the fact that the Orthodox, who have been keeping their faith for more than 2,000 years in the form in which it was transmitted by Jesus, are both called a mutation of Christianity. Both Catholics and Protestants are sure that it is their faith that is true, such as Christ intended it to be.

Differences between Orthodox and Protestants

Although Protestants and Orthodox are Christians, the differences between them are significant. First, why do Protestants reject saints? It's simple - in the Holy Scriptures it is written that the members of the ancient communities of Christians were called "saints". Protestants, taking these communities as a basis, call themselves saints, which is unacceptable and even wild for an Orthodox person. Orthodox saints are heroes of the spirit and role models. They are the guiding star on the path to God. Believers treat Orthodox saints with awe and respect. Christians of the Orthodox denomination turn to their saints with prayers for help, for prayer support in difficult situations. Icons with images of saints do not just decorate their homes and temples.

Looking at the faces of the saints, a believer seeks to improve himself through the study of the lives of those depicted on the icons, inspired by the exploits of his heroes. Having no example of the holiness of spiritual fathers, monks, elders and other very respected and authoritative people among Orthodoxy, Protestants can give only one high title and honor for a spiritual person - this is "one who has studied the Bible." A Protestant person deprives himself of such an instrument for self-education and self-improvement as fasting, confession and communion. These three components are the hospital of the human spirit, forcing you to humble your flesh and work on your weaknesses, correcting yourself and striving for the bright, kind, Divine. Without confession, a person cannot cleanse his soul, begin to correct his sins, because he does not think about his shortcomings and continues to live an ordinary life for and for the sake of the flesh, in addition, he is proud that he is a believer.

What else do Protestants lack?

No wonder many do not understand who Protestants are. After all, people of this religion, as mentioned above, do not have spiritual literature, such as that of Orthodox Christians. In the spiritual books of the Orthodox you can find almost everything - from sermons and interpretation of the Bible to the lives of the saints and advice on the fight against one's passions. It becomes much easier for a person to understand the issues of good and evil. And without the interpretation of the Holy Scriptures, the Bible is extremely difficult to understand. Protestants began to appear, but it is still only in its infancy, and in Orthodoxy this literature has been improved for more than 2000 years. Self-education, self-improvement - the concepts inherent in every Orthodox Christian, among Protestants are reduced to the study and memorization of the Bible. In Orthodoxy, everything - both repentance, and prayers, and icons - everything calls for a person to strive at least one step closer to the ideal that God is. But the Protestant directs all his efforts to be virtuous outwardly, and does not care about his inner content. That's not all. Protestants and Orthodox differences in religion are noticed by the arrangement of churches. The Orthodox believer has support in striving to be better both in mind (thanks to preaching), and in heart (thanks to decoration in churches, icons), and will (thanks to fasting). But Protestant churches are empty and Protestants hear only sermons that affect the mind without touching the hearts of people. Having abandoned monasteries, Protestant monasticism was deprived of the opportunity to see for themselves examples of a modest, humble life for the sake of the Lord. After all, monasticism is a school of spiritual life. It is not for nothing that there are many elders, saints or almost saints of Orthodox Christians among the monks. And also the concept of Protestants that nothing but faith in Christ is needed for salvation (neither good deeds, nor repentance, nor self-correction) is a false path, leading only to the addition of one more sin - pride (because of the feeling that once If you are a believer, then you are the chosen one and you will certainly be saved).

The difference between Catholics and Protestants

Despite the fact that Protestants are natives of Catholicism, there are significant differences between these two religions. So, in Catholicism, it is believed that the sacrifice of Christ atoned for all the sins of all people, and Protestants, however, like the Orthodox, believe that a person is initially sinful and the blood shed by Jesus alone is not enough to atone for sins. Man must atone for his sins. Hence the difference in the construction of temples. For Catholics, the altar is open, everyone can see the throne, for Protestants and Orthodox in churches, the altar is closed. Here's another way Catholics differ from Protestants - Protestants communicate with God without an intermediary - a priest, while Catholics have priests to mediate between a person and God.

Catholics on earth have a representative of Jesus himself, at least they think so - this is the Pope. He is an infallible person for all Catholics. The Pope of Rome resides in the Vatican, the single central governing body for all the Catholic Churches in the world. Another difference between Catholics and Protestants is the rejection by Protestants of the Catholic notion of purgatory. As mentioned above, Protestants reject icons, saints, monasteries and monasticism. They believe that believers are holy in themselves. Therefore, Protestants do not distinguish between a priest and a parishioner. A Protestant priest is accountable to the Protestant community and cannot confess or give communion to believers. In fact, he is just a preacher, that is, he reads sermons for believers. But the main difference between Catholics and Protestants is the question of the connection between God and man. Protestants believe that the personal is enough for salvation, and a person receives Grace from God without the participation of the Church.

Protestants and Huguenots

These names of religious movements are closely related. To answer the question of who the Huguenots and Protestants are, you need to remember the history of 16th century France. The French began to call the Huguenots protesting against the rule of Catholics, but the first Huguenots were called Lutherans. Although an evangelical movement independent of Germany, directed against the reforms of the Roman Church, existed in France as early as the beginning of the 16th century. The struggle of Catholics against the Huguenots did not affect the increase in the number of adherents of this movement.

Even the famous one, when the Catholics simply staged a massacre and killed many Protestants, did not break them. In the end, the Huguenots achieved recognition by the authorities of the right to exist. In the history of the development of this Protestant movement, there were oppression, and the granting of privileges, then again oppression. Yet the Huguenots persevered. By the time of the end of the twentieth century in France, the Huguenots were, albeit a small number of the population, but they were very influential. A distinctive feature in the religion of the Huguenots (followers of the teachings of John Calvin) is that some of them believed that God determines in advance which of the people will be saved, whether a person is sinful or not, and the other part of the Huguenots believed that all people are equal before God and the Lord grants salvation to everyone who accepts this salvation. Disputes between the Huguenots did not stop for a long time.

Protestants and Lutherans

The history of Protestants began to take shape in the 16th century. And one of the initiators of this movement was M. Luther, who opposed the excesses of the Roman Church. One of the directions of Protestantism began to be called by the name of this person. The name "Evangelical Lutheran Church" became widespread in the 17th century. The parishioners of this church began to be called Lutherans. It should be added that in some countries all Protestants were first called Lutherans. For example, in Russia, until the revolution, all adherents of Protestantism were considered Lutherans. To understand who Lutherans and Protestants are, you need to turn to their teachings. Lutherans believe that during the Reformation, the Protestants did not create a new Church, but restored the ancient one. Also, according to the Lutherans, God accepts any sinner as his child, and the salvation of the sinner is only the initiative of the Lord. Salvation does not depend on the efforts of a person, nor on the passage of church rites, it is God's grace, for which you do not even need to prepare. Even faith, according to the teachings of the Lutherans, is given only by the will and action of the Holy Spirit and only by the people chosen by him. A distinctive feature of Lutherans and Protestants is that Lutherans recognize baptism, and even baptism in infancy, which Protestants do not.

Protestants today

Which religion is correct is not worth judging. Only the Lord knows the answer to this question. One thing is clear: the Protestants proved their right to be. The history of Protestants, starting from the 16th century, is the history of the right to one's own opinion, to one's opinion. Neither oppression, nor execution, nor ridicule could break the spirit of Protestantism. And today, Protestants are the second largest believers among the three Christian religions. This religion has penetrated almost all countries. Protestants make up approximately 33% of the total population of the globe, or 800 million people. There are Protestant churches in 92 countries of the world, and in 49 countries the majority of the population is Protestant. This religion prevails in countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, the Netherlands, Iceland, Germany, Great Britain, Switzerland, etc.

Three Christian religions, three directions - Orthodox, Catholics, Protestants. Photos from the life of parishioners of churches of all three denominations help to understand that these directions are so similar, but with significant differences. It would, of course, be wonderful if all three forms of Christianity would come to a common opinion on controversial issues of religion and church life. But while they differ in many ways and do not compromise. A Christian can only choose which of the Christian denominations is closer to his heart and live according to the laws of the chosen Church.

At the turn of the 8th-9th centuries, the lands of the western part of the once powerful Roman Empire came out from under the influence of Constantinople. The political schism led to the division of the Christian Church into Eastern and Western, which now have their own peculiarities of governance. The Pope in the West has concentrated both ecclesiastical and secular power in the same hands. The Christian East, however, continued to live in conditions of mutual understanding and mutual respect for the two branches of power - the Church and the emperor.

The final date of the split of Christianity is considered to be 1054. The deep unity of believers in Christ was broken. After that, the Eastern Church began to be called Orthodox, and the Western - Catholic. Already from the moment of separation, there were differences in the dogma of East and West.

Let us outline the main differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism.

Organization of the Church

Orthodoxy retains a territorial division into independent local churches. Today there are fifteen of them, nine of which are patriarchates. In the field of canonical issues and rituals, local churches may have their own characteristics. Orthodox believe that Jesus Christ is the head of the Church.

Catholicism adheres to organizational unity in the authority of the pope with a division into churches of the Latin and Eastern (Uniate) rites. Monastic orders were given considerable autonomy. Catholics consider the Pope to be the head of the Church and the indisputable authority.

The Orthodox Church is guided by the decisions of the Seven Ecumenical Councils, the Catholic Church by twenty-one.

Admission of new members to the Church

In Orthodoxy, this happens through the Sacrament of Baptism by three times, in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, immersion in water. Both adults and children can be baptized. A new member of the Church, even if it is a child, immediately receives communion and is chrismated.

The sacrament of Baptism in Catholicism occurs through dousing or sprinkling with water. Both adults and children can be baptized, but the first communion takes place at the age of 7-12. By this time, the child should have learned the basics of faith.

worship

The main service for the Orthodox is the Divine Liturgy, for the Catholics - the Mass (the modern name of the Catholic liturgy).

The Orthodox of the Russian Church during services stand as a sign of special humility before God. In other Eastern Rite Churches, it is allowed to sit during worship. And as a sign of unconditional and complete obedience, the Orthodox kneel.

It is not entirely fair to say that Catholics sit for the entire service. They spend a third of the entire service standing. But there are services that Catholics listen to on their knees.

The difference in communion

In Orthodoxy, the Eucharist (Communion) is celebrated on leavened bread. Both the priesthood and the laity partake of both the Blood (under the guise of wine) and the Body of Christ (under the guise of bread).

In Catholicism, the Eucharist is celebrated on unleavened bread. The priesthood partakes of both the Blood and the Body, while the laity receive only the Body of Christ.

Confession

Confession in the presence of a priest is considered obligatory in Orthodoxy. Without confession, a person is not allowed to take communion, except for the communion of infants.

In Catholicism, confession in the presence of a priest is obligatory at least once a year.

Sign of the Cross and pectoral cross

In the tradition of the Orthodox Church - four-, six- and eight-pointed with four nails. In the tradition of the Catholic Church - a four-pointed cross with three nails. Orthodox Christians are baptized over the right shoulder, and Catholics over the left.

Icons

There are Orthodox icons venerated by Catholics, and Catholic icons venerated by Eastern Rite believers. But still there are significant differences in the sacred images on Western and Eastern icons.

The Orthodox icon is monumental, symbolic, strict. She talks about nothing and teaches no one. Its multi-level nature requires deciphering - from the literal to the sacred meaning.

The Catholic image is more picturesque and in most cases is an illustration of biblical texts. Here the imagination of the artist is noticeable.

The Orthodox icon is two-dimensional - only horizontal and vertical, this is important. It is written in the tradition of reverse perspective. The Catholic icon is three-dimensional, painted in direct perspective.

The sculptural images of Christ, the Virgin and saints, accepted in Catholic churches, are rejected by the Eastern Church.

Marriage of priests

The Orthodox priesthood is divided into white clergy and black (monks). Monks take a vow of celibacy. If the clergyman has not chosen the monastic path for himself, then he must marry. All Catholic priests observe celibacy (celibate vow).

The doctrine of the posthumous fate of the soul

In Catholicism, in addition to heaven and hell, there is a doctrine of purgatory (private judgment). This is not the case in Orthodoxy, although there is a concept of ordeals of the soul.

Relations with secular authorities

Today only in Greece and Cyprus Orthodoxy is the state religion. In all other countries the Orthodox Church is separated from the state.

The relationship of the Pope with the secular authorities of states where Catholicism is the dominant religion is regulated by concordats - agreements between the pope and the government of the country.

Once upon a time, human intrigues and mistakes divided Christians. Difference in doctrine, of course, is an obstacle to unity in faith, but should not be a reason for enmity and mutual hatred. This is not why Christ came to earth.

It is very important for a believing Christian to accurately represent the main provisions of his own faith. The difference between Orthodoxy and Catholicism, which manifested itself during the period of the church schism in the middle of the 11th century, developed over the years and centuries and created practically different branches of Christianity.

In short, what distinguishes Orthodoxy is that it is a more canonical teaching. No wonder the church is also called Eastern Orthodoxy. Here they try to adhere to the original traditions with high accuracy.

Consider the main milestones of history:

• Until the 11th century, Christianity develops as a single doctrine (of course, the statement is largely arbitrary, since for a whole millennium various heresies and new schools that deviated from the canon appeared), which is actively progressing, spreading in the world, so-called Ecumenical Councils are held, designed to solve some of the dogmatic features of the doctrine;
• The Great Schism, that is, the Church Schism of the 11th century, which separates the Western Roman Catholic Church from the Eastern Orthodox Church, in fact, the Patriarch of Constantinople (Eastern Church) and the Roman Pontiff Leo the Ninth quarreled, as a result, they betrayed each other to mutual anathema, that is, excommunication from churches;
• the separate path of the two churches: in the West, in Catholicism, the institution of pontiffs flourishes and various additions are made to the dogma; in the East, the original tradition is honored. Russia becomes in fact the successor of Byzantium, although the Greek Church remained the guardian of the Orthodox tradition to a greater extent;
• 1965 - the formal lifting of mutual anathemas after the meeting in Jerusalem and the signing of the corresponding declaration.

Over the course of almost a thousand years, Catholicism has undergone a huge number of changes. In turn, in Orthodoxy, even minor innovations that concerned only the ritual side were not always accepted.

The main differences between traditions

Initially, the Catholic Church was formally closer to the basis of the doctrine, since the Apostle Peter was the first pontiff in this particular church.

In fact, the tradition of the transmission of the Catholic ordination of the apostles comes from Peter himself.

Although consecration (that is, ordination to the priesthood) also exists in Orthodoxy, and every priest who becomes a partaker of the Holy Gifts in Orthodoxy also becomes the bearer of the original tradition coming from Christ himself and the apostles.

Note! It will take a significant amount of time to indicate each difference between Orthodoxy and Catholicism, this material sets out the most basic details and provides an opportunity to develop a conceptual understanding of the difference in traditions.

After the split, Catholics and Orthodox gradually became carriers of very different views. We will try to consider the most significant differences that relate to both dogmatics, and the ritual side, and other aspects.

Perhaps the main difference between Orthodoxy and Catholicism is contained in the text of the “Symbol of Faith” prayer, which should be regularly recited by the believer.

Such a prayer is, as it were, a super-compressed summary of the entire teaching, describes the main postulates. In Eastern Orthodoxy, the Holy Spirit comes from God the Father, each Catholic in turn reads about the descent of the Holy Spirit from both the Father and the Son.

Prior to the schism, various decisions regarding dogmatics were taken by the conciliar, that is, by representatives of all regional churches at a common council. This tradition has remained in Orthodoxy to this day, but it is not this that is essential, but the dogma of the infallibility of the pontiff of the Roman Church.

This fact is one of the most significant, which is the difference between Orthodoxy and the Catholic tradition, since the figure of the patriarch does not have such powers and has a completely different function. The pontiff, in turn, is a vicar (that is, as if an official representative with all the powers) of Christ on earth. Of course, the scriptures say nothing about this, and this dogma was adopted by the church itself much later than the crucifixion of Christ.

Even the first pontiff Peter, whom Jesus himself appointed "the stone on which he will build the church," was not endowed with such powers, he was an apostle, but no more.

However, the modern pontiff, to some extent, is no different from Christ himself (before His coming at the end of time) and can independently make any additions to the dogma. From this arise differences in dogma, which in a significant way lead away from the original Christianity.

A typical example is the virginity of the conception of the Virgin Mary, which we will discuss in more detail below. This is not indicated in the scriptures (even the exact opposite is indicated), but Catholics relatively recently (in the 19th century) accepted the dogma of the immaculate conception of the Virgin, accepted the current pontiff for that period, that is, this decision was infallible and dogmatically correct, in agreement with the will of Christ himself .

Quite rightly, it is the Orthodox and Catholic Churches that deserve more attention and detailed consideration, since only these Christian traditions have the rite of consecration, which actually comes directly from Christ through the apostles, whom He provided on the day of Pentecost with the Gifts of the Holy Spirit. The apostles, in turn, passed on the Holy Gifts through the ordination of priests. Other movements, such as, for example, Protestants or Lutherans, do not have the rite of transmission of the Holy Gifts, that is, priests in these movements are outside the direct transmission of doctrine and sacraments.

Icon painting traditions

Only Orthodoxy differs from other Christian traditions in the veneration of icons. In fact, this has not only a cultural aspect, but also a religious one.

Catholics have icons, but they do not have the exact traditions of creating images that convey the events of the spiritual world and allow one to ascend into the spiritual world. To understand the difference between the perception in the two directions of Christianity, just look at the images in the temples:

• in Orthodoxy and nowhere else (if Christianity is considered), an icon-painting image is always created using a special perspective building technique, in addition to this, deep and multifaceted religious symbols are used, those present on the icon never express earthly emotions;
• if you look in a Catholic church, you can immediately see that these are mostly paintings painted by simple artists, they convey beauty, they can be symbolic, but they focus on the earthly, saturated with human emotions;
• characteristic is the difference in the image of the cross with the Savior, because Orthodoxy differs from other traditions in the image of Christ without naturalistic details, there is no emphasis on the body, He is an example of the dominance of the spirit over the body, and Catholics most often in the crucifixion focus on the sufferings of Christ, carefully depict the details the wounds that He had, consider the feat precisely in suffering.

Note! There are separate branches of Catholic mysticism that represent an in-depth concentration on the suffering of Christ. The believer seeks to fully identify himself with the Savior and experience his full suffering. By the way, in connection with this, there are phenomena of stigmata.

In short, the orthodox church shifts the focus to the spiritual side of things, even art is used here as part of a special technique that changes the perception of a person so that he can better enter into a prayerful mood and perception of the heavenly world.

Catholics, in turn, do not use art in this way, they can emphasize beauty (Madonna and Child) or suffering (Crucifixion), but these phenomena are transmitted purely as attributes of the earthly order. As the wise saying goes, to understand religion, you need to look at the images in the temples.

Immaculate Conception of the Virgin

In the modern Western church, there is a kind of cult of the Virgin Mary, which was formed purely historically and also largely due to the adoption of the previously noted dogma about Her Immaculate Conception.

If we remember the scripture, then it clearly speaks of Joachim and Anna, who conceived quite viciously, in a normal human way. Of course, this was also a miracle, since they were elderly people, and the archangel Gabriel appeared to everyone before, but the conception was human.

Therefore, for the Orthodox, the Mother of God is not a representative of the divine nature from the very beginning. Although she subsequently ascended in the body and was taken by Christ to Heaven. Catholics now consider Her to be something like the personification of the Lord. After all, if the conception was immaculate, that is, from the Holy Spirit, then the Virgin Mary, like Christ, combined both divine and human nature.

Good to know!

Orthodoxy differs from Catholicism, but not everyone will answer the question of what exactly these differences are. There are differences between the churches in symbolism, and in the ritual, and in the dogmatic part.

We have different crosses

The first external difference between Catholic and Orthodox symbols concerns the image of the cross and the crucifix. If in the early Christian tradition there were 16 types of cross shapes, today the traditionally four-sided cross is associated with Catholicism, and the eight-pointed or six-pointed cross with Orthodoxy.

The words on the tablet on the crosses are the same, only the languages ​​\u200b\u200bare different, in which the inscription “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews. In Catholicism, this is Latin: INRI. In some Eastern churches, the Greek abbreviation INBI is used from the Greek text Ἰησοῦς ὁ Ναζωραῖος ὁ Bασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων.

In this document, in the second paragraph of the first part, the text of the Creed is given in the wording without the filioque: "Et in Spiritum Sanctum, Dominum et vivificantem, qui ex Patre procedit, qui cum Patre et Filio simul adoratur et conglorificatur, qui locutus est per prophetas" . (“And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father, who, together with the Father and the Son, is to be worshiped and glorified, who spoke through the prophets.”)

No official, conciliar decisions followed this declaration, so the situation with the filioque remains the same.

The main difference between the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church is that the head of the Orthodox Church is Jesus Christ, in Catholicism the church is headed by the vicar of Jesus Christ, its visible head (Vicarius Christi), the Pope of Rome.