What makes Judas Golovlev an “eternal type”?  What makes Judas Golovlev an “eternal type”? Poroman M. E

The type of idle talk (Iudushka Golovlev) is the artistic discovery of M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Prior to this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there are images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only slight hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin has anyone been able to portray the image of a windbag with such accusatory clarity.

Seeing for the first time an unsympathetic "candid child" sucking up to the mother, eavesdropping, ear-wielding, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shuddering creature,

Who commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judas from the first pages of the novel, so Judas dies.

One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts by Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a bigger piece for himself, to keep an extra penny, all his murders (you can’t call his policy towards relatives otherwise), in a word, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering through

Every word of Christ, Judas sends his son Petenka to certain death, harasses his niece Anninka, sends his own newborn baby to an orphanage.

But not only with such “charitable” speeches Judas harasses the household. He has two more favorite topics: family and household. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and unwillingness to see anything that lies outside his little world. However, these everyday conversations, which mother Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moralizing. He simply tyrannizes the whole family, bringing it to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering sugary speeches do not deceive anyone. Mother from childhood does not trust Porfishka: he overacts too much. Hypocrisy, combined with ignorance, does not know how to mislead.

There are several strong scenes in "Mr. Golovlyov" that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who is dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, supposedly not noticing these throwings, “in a kindred way” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as when his idle talk is expressed in "harmless" banter that never ends. The same tension is felt at the point in the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle's house.

The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas tyranny. He harasses everyone who enters his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable himself. Yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of the curse of Arina Petrovna. She saves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she really curses Porfiry, it does not produce the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Yevprakseyushka leaving, that is, the fear of breaking the established way of life once and for all. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten her departure, while she herself remains where she is. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is blunted.

The whole way of life of Judas is a transfusion from empty to empty. He considers non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, it is not known for what: he reproaches his dead mother, fines the peasants, robs the peasants. It all happens with the same false tenderness ingrained in the soul. But is it possible to say "soul" about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfish the blood-drinker except as dust.

Yudushka Golovlev is indeed an "eternal type." His name has already become a household name. Judas is the personification of a person who goes directly to self-destruction and is not aware of this until the very last moment.

Apr 13 2015

The type of idle talk (Iudushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Before that, in Russian, Gogol, Dostoevsky, there were images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only slight hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin, no one has been able to portray a windbag with such force and accusatory clarity. Judas Golovlev is a one-of-a-kind type, an ingenious find by the author. Saltykov-Shchedrin, creating his own, set himself the task of showing the mechanism for the destruction of the family. The soul of this process was, without any doubt, Porfish the blood-drinker.

It goes without saying that special attention was paid to the development of this particular one, which is interesting, among other things, and in that it is constantly changing, right up to the last pages, and the reader can never be sure what exactly this image will turn out to be in the next chapter. We observe the portrait of Judas “in dynamics”. Seeing for the first time an unsympathetic “outspoken child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, earing, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shuddering creature that commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged.

Just as Porfiry becomes Judas from the first pages of the novel, so Judas dies. There is something surprisingly petty about this name, which so accurately expresses the inner essence of this character. One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts by Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a bigger piece for himself, keep an extra penny, all his murders (you can’t call his policy towards relatives otherwise), in a word, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends his son Petenka to certain death, harasses his niece Anninka, and sends his own newborn baby to an orphanage. But not only with similar “God-pleasing” speeches Judas harasses household members.

He has two more favorite topics: family and household. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and unwillingness to see anything that lies outside his little world. However, these everyday conversations, which mother Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moralizing. He simply tyrannizes the whole family, bringing everyone to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone.

Mother from childhood does not trust Porfishka: he overacts too much. Hypocrisy, combined with ignorance, does not know how to mislead. There are several strong scenes in "Mr. Golovlyov" that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who is dying.

The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, allegedly not noticing these throwings, “in a kindred way” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as when his idle talk is expressed in "harmless" banter that never ends. The same tension is felt at the point in the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle's house.

The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas tyranny. He harasses everyone who enters his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable himself. Yet even his armor has cracks.

So, he is very afraid of the curse of Arina Petrovna. She saves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she copyright

The type of idle talk (Iudushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Prior to this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there were images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only slight hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin, no one was able to portray the image of a windbag with such force and accusatory clarity. Judas Golovlev is a one-of-a-kind type, an ingenious find by the author.

Saltykov-Shchedrin, creating his novel, set himself the task of showing the mechanism of family destruction. The soul of this process was, without any doubt, Porfish the blood-drinker. It goes without saying that the author paid special attention to the development of this particular image, which is interesting, among other things, because it is constantly changing, right up to the last pages, and the reader can never be sure what exactly this image will turn out to be in the next chapter. We observe the portrait of Judas “in dynamics”. Seeing for the first time an unsympathetic “outspoken child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, earing, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shuddering creature that commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judas from the first pages of the novel, so Judas dies. There is something surprisingly petty about this name, which so accurately expresses the inner essence of this character.

One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts by Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a bigger piece for himself, keep an extra penny, all his murders (you can’t call his policy towards relatives otherwise), in a word, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends his son Petenka to certain death, harasses his niece Anninka, and sends his own newborn baby to an orphanage.

But not only with similar “God-pleasing” speeches Judas harasses household members. He has two more favorite topics: family and household. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and unwillingness to see anything that lies outside his little world. However, these everyday conversations, which mother Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moralizing. He simply tyrannizes the whole family, bringing everyone to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone. Mother from childhood does not trust Porfishka: he overacts too much. Hypocrisy, combined with ignorance, does not know how to mislead.

There are several powerful scenes in "Mr. Golovlyov" that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who is dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, allegedly not noticing these throwings, “in a kindred way” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as when his idle talk is expressed in "harmless" banter that never ends. The same tension is felt at the point in the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle's house.

The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas tyranny. He harasses everyone who enters his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable himself. Yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of the curse of Arina Petrovna. She saves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she really curses Porfiry, it does not produce the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Yevprakseyushka leaving, that is, the fear of breaking the once and for all established way of life. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten her departure, while she herself remains in place. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is blunted.

The whole way of life of Judas is a transfusion from empty to empty. He considers non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, it is not known for what: he reproaches his dead mother, fines the peasants, robs the peasants. This happens with the same false tenderness that has ingrained into the soul. But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfish the blood-drinker except as dust.

The end of Judas is rather unexpected. It would seem, how can a selfish man who walks over corpses, a hoarder, who ruined his entire family for the sake of his own gain, commit suicide? Nevertheless, Judas seems to be beginning to realize his guilt. Saltykov-Shchedrin makes it clear that although the realization of emptiness and uselessness has come, resurrection, purification is no longer possible, as well as further existence.

Yudushka Golovlev is indeed an “eternal type”, firmly established in Russian literature. His name has already become a household name. You can not read the novel, but know this name. It is used infrequently, but still occasionally heard in speech. Of course, Judas is a literary exaggeration, a collection of various vices for the edification of posterity. These vices in the first place - hypocrisy, idle talk, worthlessness. Judas is the personification of a person who goes directly to self-destruction and is not aware of this until the very last moment. No matter how exaggerated this character is, his flaws are human, non-fictional. That is why the type of windbag is eternal.

The type of idle talk (Iudushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Prior to this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there were images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only slight hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin, no one was able to portray the image of a windbag with such force and accusatory clarity. Judas Golovlev is a one-of-a-kind type, an ingenious find by the author.
Saltykov-Shchedrin, creating his novel, set himself the task of showing the mechanism of family destruction. The soul of this process was, without any doubt, Porfish the blood-drinker. It goes without saying that the author paid special attention to the development of this particular image, which is interesting, among other things, because it is constantly changing, right up to the last pages, and the reader can never be sure what exactly this image will turn out to be in the next chapter. We observe the portrait of Judas “in dynamics”. Seeing for the first time an unsympathetic “outspoken child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, earing, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shuddering creature that commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judas from the first pages of the novel, so Judas dies. There is something surprisingly petty about this name, which so accurately expresses the inner essence of this character.
One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts by Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a bigger piece for himself, keep an extra penny, all his murders (you can’t call his policy towards relatives otherwise), in a word, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends his son Petenka to certain death, harasses his niece Anninka, and sends his own newborn baby to an orphanage.
But not only with similar “God-pleasing” speeches Judas harasses household members. He has two more favorite topics: family and household. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and unwillingness to see anything that lies outside his little world. However, these everyday conversations, which mother Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moralizing. He simply tyrannizes the whole family, bringing everyone to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone. Mother from childhood does not trust Porfishka: he overacts too much. Hypocrisy, combined with ignorance, does not know how to mislead.
There are several strong scenes in "Mr. Golovlyov" that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who is dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, allegedly not noticing these throwings, “in a kindred way” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as when his idle talk is expressed in "harmless" banter that never ends. The same tension is felt at the point in the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle's house.
The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas tyranny. He harasses everyone who enters his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable himself. Yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of the curse of Arina Petrovna. She saves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she really curses Porfiry, it does not produce the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Yevprakseyushka leaving, that is, the fear of breaking the once and for all established way of life. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten her departure, while she herself remains in place. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is blunted.
The whole way of life of Judas is a transfusion from empty to empty. He considers non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, it is not known for what: he reproaches his dead mother, fines the peasants, robs the peasants. This happens with the same false tenderness that has ingrained into the soul. But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfish the blood-drinker except as dust.
The end of Judas is rather unexpected. It would seem, how can a selfish man who walks over corpses, a hoarder, who ruined his entire family for the sake of his own gain, commit suicide? Nevertheless, Judas seems to be beginning to realize his guilt. Saltykov-Shchedrin makes it clear that although the realization of emptiness and uselessness has come, resurrection, purification is no longer possible, as well as further existence.
Yudushka Golovlev is indeed an “eternal type”, firmly established in Russian literature. His name has already become a household name. You can not read the novel, but know this name. It is used infrequently, but still occasionally heard in speech. Of course, Judas is a literary exaggeration, a collection of various vices for the edification of posterity. These vices in the first place - hypocrisy, idle talk, worthlessness. Judas is the personification of a person who goes directly to self-destruction and is not aware of this until the very last moment. No matter how exaggerated this character is, his flaws are human, not fictional. That is why the type of windbag is eternal.

/* ads 160x90 */

• Popular

  The novel "Golovlevs" is an evil satire on the nobility. With inexorable truthfulness, Shchedrin draws a picture of the destruction of a noble family, reflecting the decline, decay, doom of "Lord Golovlev" - this is a social novel from the life of a noble family. The disintegration of bourgeois society, as in a mirror, was also reflected in the disintegration of the family. The whole complex of moral “Lord Golovlev” is collapsing - a novel about a family, but, first of all, this is a novel about true and imaginary values, about why a person lives on Earth. In "Lords of the Golovlevs" the author explores the work of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin in an extremely diverse way. He wrote novels, dramas, chronicles, essays, reviews, stories, articles, reviews.
  Among the huge legacy of the satirist, a special “Lord Golovlev” is a family chronicle. With inexorable truthfulness, the author paints a picture of the destruction of a noble family. The causes of degeneration are social, and therefore, we are talking about ... In satire, reality as a kind of imperfection is opposed to the ideal as the highest reality. F. Schiller Saltykov-Shchedrin - the original writer of Russian literature, occupying the Type of idle talk (Judushka Golovlev) - the artistic discovery of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Prior to this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there were images that remotely resembled. Among the vast heritage of M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, his fairy tales are most popular. The folk tale form was used by many writers before Shchedrin. Literary fairy tales All writers through their works try to convey to us, readers, their own innermost thoughts. A real writer, by virtue of his talent and the peculiarities of the inner world, he was smart, honest, stern and never hushed up the truth, no matter how regrettable it was ... M. Gorky It seems to me that without the writer Saltykov-Shchedrin it is impossible to understand the political Tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin are usually defined as the result of his satirical work. And this conclusion is justified to some extent. Fairy tales chronologically complete the actual satirical work. A special place in Russian literature of the 19th century is occupied by the work of the famous writer M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Following N.V. Gogol, he went the hard way of satire. His satire is caustic, often

• Advertising

• Tags

• Statistics

What makes Judas Golovlev an “eternal type”? based on the novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “God Golovlevs”

/* ads 300x250 */

The type of idle talk (Iudushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Prior to this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there were images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only slight hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin, no one was able to portray the image of a windbag with such force and accusatory clarity. Judas Golovlev is a one-of-a-kind type, an ingenious find by the author.

Saltykov-Shchedrin, creating his novel, set himself the task of showing the mechanism of family destruction. The soul of this process was, without any doubt, Porfish the blood-drinker. It goes without saying that the author paid special attention to the development of this particular image, which is interesting, among other things, because it is constantly changing, right up to the last pages, and the reader can never be sure what exactly this image will turn out to be in the next chapter.

We observe the portrait of Judas “in dynamics”. Seeing for the first time an unsympathetic “outspoken child”, fawning over his mother, eavesdropping, tinkering, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shuddering creature that commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judas from the first pages of the novel, so Judas dies. There is something surprisingly petty about this name, which so accurately expresses the inner essence of this character.

One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts by Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a bigger piece for himself, keep an extra penny, all his murders (you can’t call his policy towards relatives otherwise), in a word, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends his son Petenka to certain death, harasses his niece Anninka, and sends his own newborn baby to an orphanage. But not only with similar “God-pleasing” speeches Judas harasses household members. He has two more favorite topics: family and household. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and unwillingness to see anything that lies outside his little world. However, these everyday conversations, which mother Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moralizing.

He simply tyrannizes the whole family, bringing everyone to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone. Mother from childhood does not trust Porfishka: he overacts too much.

Hypocrisy, combined with ignorance, does not know how to mislead. There are several strong scenes in "Mr. Golovlyov" that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who is dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, allegedly not noticing these throwings, “in a kindred way” makes fun of his brother.

The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as when his idle talk is expressed in "harmless" banter that never ends. The same tension is felt at the point in the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle's house. The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas tyranny.

He harasses everyone who enters his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable himself. Yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of the curse of Arina Petrovna. She saves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she really curses Porfiry, it does not produce the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Evprakseyushka leaving, that is, the fear of breaking the established way of life once and for all. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten her departure, while she herself remains in place.

Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is blunted. The whole way of life of Judas is a transfusion from empty to empty. He considers non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, it is not known for what: he reproaches his dead mother, fines the peasants, robs the peasants. This happens with the same false tenderness that has ingrained into the soul.

But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfish the blood-drinker except as dust. The end of Judas is rather unexpected.

It would seem, how can a selfish man who walks over corpses, a hoarder, who ruined his entire family for the sake of his own gain, commit suicide? Nevertheless, Judas seems to be beginning to realize his guilt. Saltykov-Shchedrin makes it clear that although the realization of emptiness and uselessness has come, resurrection, purification is no longer possible, as well as further existence. Yudushka Golovlev is indeed an “eternal type”, firmly established in Russian literature. His name has already become a household name. You can not read the novel, but know this name.

It is used infrequently, but still occasionally heard in speech. Of course, Judas is a literary exaggeration, a collection of various vices for the edification of posterity. These vices in the first place - hypocrisy, idle talk, worthlessness.

Judas is the personification of a person who goes directly to self-destruction and is not aware of this until the very last moment. No matter how exaggerated this character is, his flaws are human, not fictional. That is why the type of windbag is eternal.

/* ads 468 */
Liked the article - » What makes Judas Golovlev an “eternal type”? based on the novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “God Golovlevs”? Click and save.

The novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “Lord Golovlevs” can be called the story of an escheated family doomed to death because of the thirst for acquisition that struck it, because of the loss of human ties between people. The latter especially applies to Porfiry Vladimirych Roman M.E. Saltikov-Shchedrin “Goodness Golovlevi” can be called a history of swindling sim "ї, doomed to death through її spraga, which struck, bait, through the loss of human zv" tongues between people. Remain especially fond of Porfiry
• Why rob Judas Golovlev with an “eternal type”? based on the novel by M. E. Saltikov-Shchedrin “Good Golovlevi”
The type of idle talk (Iudushka Golovlev) is the artist's work by M.E. Saltikov-Shchedrin. Before that, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoyevsky, images were chiming that far off guessing Judas, but only light pressures. Hi
• Vice under the guise of virtue Based on the novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “Lord Golovlevs”
When you try to capture in your mind's eye all the endless number of satirical characters that rise before us from the pages of the works of M.E. Shchedrin, then at first you even get lost: there are so many of them and they are so diverse.
• Vice under the guise of garlic According to the novel by M. E. Saltikov-Shchedrin “Good Golovlevi”
If you think about all the inexhaustible number of satirical characters that stand before us from the side of the works of M.E.
• “To what lowness can a person go ...” based on the novel “Goodness Golovlevi”
Saltikov-Shchedrin is one of the prominent writers-satirists of classical Russian literature. Yogo talent is original, original and cicavi, it is impossible to pass through his creativity. The pismennik richly and plyadno pratsyuvav, vіd dobutku to dobutku
• Vice under the guise of virtue based on the novel by M. Saltykov-Shchedrin “Lord Golovlevs”
When you try to capture in your mind's eye all the endless number of satirical characters that arise before us from the pages of the works of M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, then at first you even get lost: they are so many, so diverse they are. One